Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attitudes of Professionals Toward the Need for Assistive and Social Robots in the Healthcare Sector

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

We conducted three studies among healthcare professionals and explored the need for service and social robots in the healthcare sector. The methods consisted of cross-sectional surveys and literature reviews. The survey data were analyzed with cross-tabulations, a logistic regression model, a Pearson correlation test, and a factor analysis. The literature reviews showed that there were only a few papers which discussed the use of service and social robots as tools by healthcare workers. Both professional care workers and healthcare educators perceived that robots were able to increase productivity. The results also showed that robots are able to reduce the mental workload of workers and to increase the diversity of work. Robots were also considered as good devices for activating the patients’ motoric and cognitive skills and for making them happy. Even if the attitudes were positive and people were not afraid that robots may take over workplaces, the ecosystem of social robotics is still fragmented and the number of intervention studies among professional care workers is small. Policymakers should create a strategy for promoting service and social robots in the healthcare sector. The strategy should take into account robotics in education and implementation of robots in healthcare facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(11), 825–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alameddine, M., Baumann, A., Laporte, A., & Deber, R. (2012). A narrative review on the effect of economic downturns on the nursing labour market: Implications for policy and planning. Human Resources for Health, 10, 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, A., Pereira, A., Walter, S., Almeida, R., Loureiro, R., Compagna, D., & Kyberd, P. (2014). Bridging the gap between robotic technology and health care. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 10, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2013.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arras, K., & Cerqui, D. (2005). Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? Tech. Rep., 0605-001, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck, C., & Forlizzi, J. (2004). A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Ro-Man 2004 (S. 591–594).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beedholm, K., Frederiksen, K., Frederiksen, A.-M., & Skovsgaard-Lomborg, K. (2015). Attitudes to a robot bathtub in Danish elder care: A hermeneutic interview study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17(3), 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boman, I.-L., & Bartfai, A. (2015). The first step in using a robot in brain injury rehabilitation: Patients’ and health-care professionals’ perspective. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(5), 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Consulting Group. (2015). Takeoff in robotics will power the next productivity surge in manufacturing. https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2015/02/13/924190/0/en/Takeoff-in-Robotics-Will-Power-the-Next-Productivity-Surge-in-Manufacturing.html.

  • Bots, Z. (2016). Zora the first social robot already widely used in Healthcare. http://www.roboticstomorrow.com/article/2016/04/zora-the-first-social-robot-already-widely-used-in-healthcare/7927.

  • Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of health care robots for the older populations: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, E., Tamagawa, R., Patience, A., Knock, B., Kerse, N., Day, K., & MacDonald, B. A. (2012). Attitudes towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 31(2), 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budisan, O., Ignat, I., Vacariu, L., & Florea, C. (2010). Social interaction in systems of humans and mobile robots. Solid State Phenomena, 166–167, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.166-167.89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibani, A., Amirat, Y., Mohammed, S., Matson, E., Hagita, N., & Barreto, M. (2013). Ubiquitous robotics: Recent challenges and future trends. Robotics and autonomous systems, 61(11), 1162–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2013.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y-Y., Wang, J-F., Lin, P-C., Shih, P-Y., Tsai, H-C., & Kwan, D-Y. (2011). Human-robot interaction based on cloud computing infrastructure for senior companion. In: TENCON 2011 IEEE Region 10 Conference (pp. 1431–1434).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mansfield, J., & Biddison, J. (2007). The scope and future trends of gerontechnology: Consumers’ opinions and literature survey. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25(3), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compagna, D., & Kohlbacher, F. (2015). The limits of participatory technology development: The case of service robots in care facilities for older people. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 19–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Technological Institute. (2015). Robot co-worker for assembly. http://www.dti.dk/services/robot-co-worker-for-assembly/32733.

  • Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 362(1480), 679–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diep, L., Cabibihan, J. J., & Wolbring, G. (2015). Social robots: Views of special education teachers. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on ICTs for Improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques (S. 160–163).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B., Rooney, C., O’Hare, G., & O’Donoghue, R. (1999). What is a Social Robot? 10th Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence & Cognitive Science, University College Cork, Ireland. http://www.csi.ucd.ie/csprism/publications/pub1999/AICS99Duf.pdf.

  • euRobotics aisbl. (2015a). Strategic research agenda for robotics in Europe 2014–2020, applications: Societal challenges (pp. 59–64). http://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/PPP/SRA2020_SPARC.pdf.

  • euRobotics aisbl. (2015b). Robotics 2020 multi-annual roadmap for robotics in Europe. Call 1 ICT23—Horizon 2020. Initial Release B 15/01/2014. http://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/PDF/Multi-Annual_Roadmap_2020_Call_1_Initial_Release.pdf. Retrieved January 16, 2015.

  • European Commission. (2013). EU-funded research into robotics for ageing well. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/node/376.

  • Ferrari, E., Robins, B., & Dautenhahn, K. (2010). Does it work? A framework to evaluate the effectiveness of a robotic toy for children with special needs. In 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flandorfer, P. (2012). Population ageing and socially assistive robots for elderly persons: The importance of sociodemographic factors for user acceptance. International Journal of Population Research. ID 829835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, T., Thorpe, C., & Baur, C. (2001). Collaboration, dialogue, and human-robot interaction. In 10th International Symposium of Robotics Research, Lorne, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, S. S. (2007). Social robotics: Integrating advances in engineering and computer science. In: Proceedings of Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology International Conference (S. 9–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeldner, M., Herstatt, C., & Tietze, F. (2015). The emergence of care robotics—A patent and publication analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göransson, O., Pettersson, K., Larsson, P., & Lennernäs, B. (2008). Personals attitudes towards robot assisted health care—a pilot study in 111 respondents. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, 137, 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddadin, S., Suppa, M., Fuchs, S., Bodenmüller, T., Albu-Schäffer, A., & Hirzinger, G. (2011). Towards the robotic co-worker. In Robotics Research, The 14th International Symposium ISRR (S. 261–282). Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, B., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFR. (2017). The international federation of robotics. https://ifr.org/img/office/Service_Robots_2016_Chapter_1_2.pdf.

  • Ilmarinen, J., Tuomi, K., & Klockars, M. (1997). Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 23(1), 49–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen, K., & Wilcock, G. (2017). Expectations and first experience with a social robot. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (S. 511–515).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanamori, M., Suzuki, M., & Tanaka, M. (2002). Maintenance and improvement of quality of life among elderly patients using a pet-type robot. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. Japanese Journal of Geriatrics, 39(2), 214–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosla, R., & Mei-Tai Chu., M-T. (2013). Embodying care in Matilda: An affective communication robot for emotional wellbeing of older people in Australian residential care facilities. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems., 4(18), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Wang, Z., Cai, W., & Feng, D. (2008). Multimedia for Future Health-Smart Medical Home. In Biomedical Information Technology. Burlington: Academic Press, 23. (S. 497–512). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012373583-6.50027-x.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kollengode, A. (2015). Voice of the customer (Patient) for six sigma processes in healthcare. Process Excellence Network. http://www.processexcellencenetwork.com/lean/columns/voice-of-the-customer-patient-for-six-sigma-proces/.

  • Kozima, H., Michalowski, M., & Nakagawa, C. (2008). Keepon—A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, H. I., Hogan, N., Volpe, B. T., Aisen, M. L., Edelstein, L., & Diels, C. (1999). Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: A robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. Technology and Health Care, 7, 419–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A., & Severinson-Eklundh, K. (2011). An exploratory study of health professionals’ attitudes about robotic telepresence technology. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29(4), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Bekey, G., & Zheng, Y. (2005). Assessment of international research and development in robotics: Industrial, personal, and service robots, Chapter 5 (S. 55–62). http://www.wtec.org/robotics/report/05-Industrial.pdf.

  • Lee, M., & Forlizzi, J. (2009). Designing adaptive robotic services. In Proceedings of IASDR’09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linner, T., Pan, W., Georgoulas, C., Georgescu, B., Güttler, J., & Bock, T. (2014). Co-adaptation of robot systems, processes and in-house environments for professional care assistance in an ageing society. Procedia Engineering, 85,328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDorman, K., Vasudevan, S., & Ho, C. (2009). Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures. AI & Society, 23(4), 485–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, Q., & Lee, M. (2006). Design issues for assistive robotics for the elderly. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2005.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munton, T., Alison, M., Marrero, I., Llewellyn, A., Gibson, K., & Gomersall, A. (2015). Getting out of hospital? The evidence for shifting acute inpatient and day case services from hospitals into the community. London, UK.: The Health Foundation.http://www.health.org.uk/publications/getting-out-of-hospital.

  • Muszyńska, M., & Rau, R. (2012). The old-age healthy dependency ratio in Europe. Journal of Population Ageing, 5(3), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (2013). Patchy robotics industry growth doesn’t fit with aging population growth. Pergali, Editorial. http://pergali.com/patchy-robotics-industry-growth-doesnt-fit-with-aging-population-growth/.

  • Okumura, Y., & Higuchi, T. (2011). Cost of depression among adults in Japan. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.4088/pcc.10m01082.

  • Peine, A., Rollwagen, I., & Neven, L. (2014). The rise of the “innosumer”—Rethinking older technology users. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.06.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigini, L., Facal, D., Blasi, L., & Andrich, R. (2012). Service robots in elderly care at home: Users’ needs and perceptions as a basis for concept development. Technology & Disability, 24(4), 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, S., Kazdin, A., & Scassellati, B. (2015). Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: Applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rincon, F., Vibbert, M., Childs, V., Fry, R., Caliguri, D., Urtecho, J., … Jallo, J. (2012). Implementation of a model of robotic tele-presence (RTP) in the neuro-ICU: Effect on critical care nursing team satisfaction. Neurocritical Care, 17(1), 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. (1993a). Economic evaluation and health care, cost-effectiveness analysis. BMJ, 307, 793–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. (1993b). Economic evaluation and health care, cost-benefit analysis. BMJ, 307, 924–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saborovski, M., & Kollak, I. (2014). How do you care for technology?—Care professionals’ experiences with assistive technology in care of the elderly. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saritas, O., & Keenan, M. (2004). Broken promises and/or techno dreams? The future of health and social services in Europe. Foresight, 6(5), 281–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauppe, A., & Mutlu, B. (2015). The social impact of a robot co-worker in industrial settings. http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~bilge/pubs/2015/CHI15-Sauppe.pdf.

  • Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M., & Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: A psychological approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2015). Is da vinci robotic surgery a revolution or a ripoff? HealthlineNews. http://www.healthline.com/health-news/is-da-vinci-robotic-surgery-revolution-or-ripoff-021215.

  • Sekmen, A., & Challa, P. (2013). Assessment of adaptive human–robot interactions. Knowledge-Based Systems, 42, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobocki, P., Angst, J., Jönsson, B., & Rehnberg, C. (2006). Cost of depression in Europe. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 9(2), 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield, M., Seagull, F., Vaidya, N., & Xiao, Y. (2011). Use of pharmacy delivery robots in intensive care units. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 68(1), 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, C. D., Der-Yeghiaian, L., Le, V., Motiwala, R. R., & Cramer, S. C. (2008). Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain, 131, 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapus, A., Mataric,’ M., & Scassellati, B. (2007). The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. Robotics Autom Mag IEEE, 14(1), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2015). Hospitals are very bad places for the elderly, says head of the NHS as he calls for expansion of community care. Daily Mail. Associated Newspapers Ltd. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2265692/Hospitals-bad-places-elderly-says-head-NHS-compares-treatment-national-scandals-asylum-care.html.

  • Tobe, F. (2012). Where are the elder care robots? IEEE Spectrum 2012. http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/home-robots/where-are-the-eldercare-robots.

  • Van der Loos, H. F. M., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2008). Rehabilitation and health care robotics, handbook of robotics. New York, NY: Springer. (S. 1223–1251).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänni, K. (2013). Social robotics as a tool for promoting occupational health. In COST event: The future concept and reality of Social Robotics, Brussels, Belgium (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänni, K. (2017). Robot applications in communication. In Smart technology solutions support the elderly to continue living in their own homes. Reports of the Ministry of the Environment 7/2017, (S. 44–51). Ministry of the Environment in Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänni, K., & Korpela, A. (2015). Role of social robotics in supporting employees and advancing productivity. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9388. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänni, K., & Korpela, A. (2016). An effort to develop a web-based approach to assess the need for robots among the elderly. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänni, K., & Salin, S. (2017). A need for service robots among health care professionals in hospitals and housing services. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänni, K., Savolainen, J., Salin, S., & Haho, P. (2017). Innovation platform for service robotics. https://www.researchgate.net/project/Innovation-platform-for-service-robotics.

  • Vänni, K., Cabibihan, J.-J., & Salin, S. (2018). Attitudes of heads of education and directors of research towards the need for social robotics education in Universities. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9979. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.-H., Wrobel, J., Cristancho-Lacroix, V., Kamali, L., Chetouani, M., Duhaut, D., … Rigaud, A.-S. (2013). Designing an assistive robot for older adults: The ROBADOM project. IRBM, 34(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2013.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zullo, M., McCarroll, M., Mendise, T., Ferris, E., Roulette, G., Zolton, J., … Gruenigen, V. (2014). Safety culture in the gynecology robotics operating room. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 21(5), 893–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere, Finland

    Kimmo J. Vänni & Sirpa E. Salin

Authors
  1. Kimmo J. Vänni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sirpa E. Salin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimmo J. Vänni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Offenburg, Germany

    Oliver Korn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vänni, K.J., Salin, S.E. (2019). Attitudes of Professionals Toward the Need for Assistive and Social Robots in the Healthcare Sector. In: Korn, O. (eds) Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17106-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17107-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation