Abstract
With this chapter, I continue to scrutinise and critique current conceptualisations of everyday life in austerity. Having established that everyday social relationships are made up of family, friends and other intimate relations, I set about exploring the intimacies that constitute these relationships: their forms, consistencies and reciprocities. Such intimacies can lead to further closeness and strengthened bonds, or to tensions and conflict. Both of these elements are significant within relational geographies of austerity. Situating social relationships as the focus, in this chapter, I work outwards to consider the difference that austerity makes for intimacy, and that intimacy makes for austerity. My aim is to illustrate how the hidden or less-discussed pockets of everyday intimacies in austerity can be uncovered when our focus is on relationships and relational space. After introducing ideas about intimacy from a range of scholars across human geography, sociology, philosophy and social care, the chapter is then arranged into four parts: intimate monetary arrangements, momentary encounters, more-than-human intimacies and material proximities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Askins, K. (2015). Being Together: Everyday Geographies and the Quiet Politics of Belonging. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14(2), 470–478.
Brewster, L. (2014). The Public Library as Therapeutic Landscape: A Qualitative Case Study. Health & Place, 26, 94–99.
Bridge, G., & Smith, A. (2003). Intimate Encounters: Culture—Economy—Commodity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21, 257–268.
Bunnell, T., Yea, S., Peake, L., Skelton, T., & Smith, M. (2012). Geographies of Friendships. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 490–507.
Burrell, K. (2017). The Recalcitrance of Distance: Exploring the Infrastructures of Sending in Migrants’ Lives. Mobilities, 12(6), 813–826.
Charles, N. (2000). Feminism, the State and Social Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Charles, N., & Davies, C. A. (2008). My Family and Other Animals. Sociological Research Online, 13(5), 4.
Cox, R., & Narula, R. (2003). Playing Happy Families: Rules and Relationships in Au Pair Employing Households in London, England. Gender Place and Culture, 10, 333–344.
Devault, M. (1991). Feeding the Family: The Social Organisation of Caring as Gendered Work. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Dyck, I. (2005). Feminist Geography, the “Everyday”, and Local-Global Relations: Hidden Spaces of Place-Making. The Canadian Geographer, 49, 233–245.
England, K. (2010). Home, Work and the Shifting Geographies of Care. Ethics, Place & Environment, 13(2), 131–150.
England, K., & Dyck, I. (2011). Managing the Body Work of Home Care. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(2), 206–219.
Fox, E. (2006). Animal Behaviours, Post-Human Lives: Everyday Negotiations of the Animal-Human Divide in Pet-Keeping. Social and Cultural Geography, 7(4), 525–537.
Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
Hall, S. M. (2009). “Private Life” and “Work Life”: Difficulties and Dilemmas When Making and Maintaining Friendships with Ethnographic Participants. Area, 41, 263–272.
Hall, S. M. (2014). Ethics of Ethnography with Families: A Geographical Perspective. Environment and Planning A, 46(9), 2175–2194.
Hall, S. M. (2016a). Everyday Family Experiences of the Financial Crisis: Getting by in the Recent Economic Recession. Journal of Economic Geography, 16(2), 305–330.
Hall, S. M. (2016b). Moral Geographies of Family: Articulating, Forming and Transmitting Moralities in Everyday Life. Social & Cultural Geography, 17(8), 1017–1039.
Hall, S. M. (2016c). Family Relations in Times of Austerity: Reflections from the UK. In S. Punch, R. Vanderbeck, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Geographies of Children and Young People: Families, Intergenerationality and Peer Group Relations. Berlin: Springer.
Hall, S. M., & Holmes, H. (2017). Making Do and Getting By? Beyond a Romantic Politics of Austerity and Crisis. Discover Society, p. 44. Retrieved from https://discoversociety.org/2017/05/02/making-do-and-getting-by-beyond-a-romantic-politics-of-austerity-and-crisis/.
Hall, S. M., & Jayne, M. (2016). Make, Mend and Befriend: Geographies of Austerity, Crafting and Friendship in Contemporary Cultures of Dressmaking. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(2), 216–234.
Harker, C., & Martin, L. L. (2012). Familial Relations: Spaces, Subjects, and Politics. Environment and Planning A, 44(4), 768–775.
Herbert, S. (2000). For Ethnography. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 550–568.
Holdsworth, C. (2013). Family and Intimate Mobilities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holloway, S. L. (1998). Local Childcare Cultures: Moral Geographies of Mothering and the Social Organisation of Pre-school Education. Gender, Place & Culture, 5, 29–53.
Holmes, H. (2015). Transient Craft: Reclaiming the Contemporary Craft Worker. Work, Employment and Society, 29(3), 479–495.
Holmes, H. (2018a). New Spaces, Ordinary Practices: Circulating and Sharing Within Diverse Economies of Provisioning. Geoforum, 88, 134–147.
Holmes, H. (2018b). Material Affinities: “Doing” Family Through the Practices of Passing On. Sociology, 53(1), 174–191.
Horton, J., & Kraftl, P. (2009). Small Acts, Kind Words and “Not Too Much Fuss”: Implicit Activisms. Emotion, Space and Society, 2(1), 14–23.
Hubbard, P. (2001). Sex Zones: Intimacy, Citizenship and Public Space. Sexualities, 4(1), 51–71.
Jackson, L. (2016). Intimate Citizenship? Rethinking the Politics and Experience of Citizenship as Emotional in Wales and Singapore. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(6), 817–833.
Jackson, L., Harris, C., & Valentine, G. (2017). Rethinking Concepts of the Strange and the Stranger. Social & Cultural Geography, 18(1), 1–15.
Jamieson, L. (1997). Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jamieson, L. (1999). Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the ‘Pure Relationship’. Sociology, 33(3), 477–494.
Jayne, M., & Leung, H. H. (2014). Embodying Chinese Urbanism: Towards a Research Agenda. Area, 46(3), 256–267.
Jupp, E. (2013a). Enacting Parenting Policy? The Hybrid Spaces of Sure Start Children’s Centres. Children’s Geographies, 11(2), 173–187.
Lewis, C. (2018). Making Community Through the Exchange of Material Things. Journal of Material Culture, 23(3), 295–311.
McDowell, L. (2012). Post-Crisis, Post-Ford and Post-Gender? Youth Identities in an Era of Austerity. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(5), 573–590.
Morgan, D. (2009). Acquaintances: The Space Between Intimates And Strangers: The Space Between Intimates and Strangers. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morrison, C., Johnston, L., & Longhurst, R. (2012). Critical Geographies of Love as Spatial, Relational and Political. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), 505–521.
Nast, H. J. (2006). Critical Pet Studies? Antipode, 38(5), 894–906.
Oswin, N., & Olund, E. (2010). Governing Intimacy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 60–67.
Pearson, R., & Elson, D. (2015). Transcending the Impact of the Financial Crisis in the United Kingdom: Towards Plan F—A Feminist Economic Strategy. Feminist Review, 109, 8–30.
Power, E. (2008). Furry Families: Making a Human-Dog Family Through Home. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 535–555.
Pratt, G. (1997). Stereotypes and Ambivalence: The Construction of Domestic Workers in Vancouver, British Columbia. Gender, Place and Culture, 4(2), 159–178.
Rose, G. (1995). Love’s Work. New York: New York Review Books.
Smith, A., & Stenning, A. (2006). Beyond Household Economies: Articulations and Spaces of Economic Practice in Post-Socialism. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 190–213.
Stenning, A., & Hall, S. M. (2018). Loneliness and the Politics of Austerity. Discover Society, p. 62. Retrieved from https://discoversociety.org/2018/11/06/on-the-frontline-loneliness-and-the-politics-of-austerity/.
Tarrant, A. (2010). Constructing a Social Geography of Grandparenthood: A New Focus for Intergenerationality. Area, 42(2), 190–197.
Tipper, B. (2011). “A Dog Who I Know Quite Well”: Everyday Relationships Between Children and Animals. Children’s Geographies, 9(2), 145–165.
Twigg, J. (2006). The Body in Health and Social Care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Valentine, G. (2008a). The Ties that Bind: Towards Geographies of Intimacy. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2097–2110.
Valentine, G. (2008b). Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.
Valentine, G., Piekut, A., & Harris, C. (2015). Intimate Encounters: The Negotiation of Difference Within the Family and Its Implications for Social Relations in Public Space. The Geographical Journal, 181(3), 280–294.
Wilson, H. F. (2017). On Geography and Encounter: Bodies, Borders, and Difference. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 45–471.
Woodward, S. (2015). The Hidden Lives of Domestic Things: Accumulations in Cupboards, Lofts and Shelves. In E. Casey & Y. Taylor (Eds.), Intimacies, Critical Consumption and Diverse Economies (pp. 216–231). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Zelizer, V. (2005). The Purchase of Intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hall, S.M. (2019). Austere Intimacies and Intimate Austerities. In: Everyday Life in Austerity. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17094-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17094-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17093-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17094-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)