Skip to main content

The Effects of International Agreements on Water Security: A Critical Study of the EU and MERCOSUR Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Consumption

Abstract

The consequences of overuse of the planet’s water supplies are the subject of emerging concern. This chapter aims to critically discuss the effects of different regulatory approaches to water security, comparing the European Union (EU) and the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR) and paying close attention to industrial activity. Water security can be understood as the adequate availability of water to meet the needs of society, the economy and the ecosystem. Thus, the study intends to: (i) question the legal base, its coercive power and extent; (ii) explore effects of agreements on internal water regulation, focusing especially on the industrial sector; (iii) identify hydro-sustainable policies adopted by governments to control industrial activity considering the domestic and international laws. The chapter employs the critical hermeneutics methodology, examining publications of governments, international organisations, NGOs, academic articles, and international newspapers and magazines. The chapter notes that the most effective treaties regarding water security are those that have economic coercion clauses, such as the Basel and Stockholm Conventions. It concludes that current regulation and policies, especially in MERCOSUR, need to be urgently revised to ensure the quantity, quality and accessibility of water reserves are to be maintained for present and future generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    World Wildlife Fund (2016).

  2. 2.

    UN (2015).

  3. 3.

    Stritzel (2007), Spring (2010) and Balzacq and Guzzini (2015).

  4. 4.

    See Allenby (2000) and Magsig (2012).

  5. 5.

    See Beck (1995), Goldblat (1996), Hall and Borgomeo (2013) and Lupton (2013).

  6. 6.

    See Dalin et al. (2012), Hoekstra (2015), Carvalho and Santos (2017) and Hoekstra (2017).

  7. 7.

    Hoekstra (2015) and Hoekstra (2017).

  8. 8.

    UN (2011, 2015).

  9. 9.

    UN (2015).

  10. 10.

    UN (2013).

  11. 11.

    Soares (2015).

  12. 12.

    See Mccaffrey (2009) and Minaverry (2016).

  13. 13.

    Stockholm Convention (2004).

  14. 14.

    Secretariat of the Basel Convention (2014).

  15. 15.

    This regional bloc is formed by the following countries: Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela.

  16. 16.

    MERCOSUR (1992).

  17. 17.

    GMC Resolution No. 20/95, CMC No. 59/00.

  18. 18.

    See Penna and Cristeche (2008).

  19. 19.

    See Capaldo (2010).

  20. 20.

    Government of Brazil (1997).

  21. 21.

    Government of Brazil (2010).

  22. 22.

    Chamber of Deputies of Brazil (2015).

  23. 23.

    Government of São Paulo State (1976).

  24. 24.

    Hirata and Ferreira (2017).

  25. 25.

    National Association of Research and Development of Innovative Companies of Brazil (2010).

  26. 26.

    Federation of Industries of São Paulo (2017).

  27. 27.

    This regional bloc is formed by the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

  28. 28.

    Swissinfo (2016).

  29. 29.

    Swissinfo (2006).

  30. 30.

    Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine (2017).

  31. 31.

    La Nación (2017).

  32. 32.

    Kuhn and Roisenberg (2017).

  33. 33.

    National Water Agency of Brazil (2017).

  34. 34.

    Mortatti et al. (2010) and Hirata and Ferreira (2017).

  35. 35.

    UN (2017) and National Water Agency of Brazil (2017).

  36. 36.

    Environmental Portal (2015) and Carta Capital Magazine (2015).

  37. 37.

    Exame Magazine (2015).

  38. 38.

    See Supreme Court of Argentina (2006).

  39. 39.

    The Telegraph (2013).

  40. 40.

    Capaldo (2010).

  41. 41.

    Carvalho and Santos (2016).

  42. 42.

    The Guardian (2013).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Carvalho, K.M., Minaverry, C.M. (2020). The Effects of International Agreements on Water Security: A Critical Study of the EU and MERCOSUR Approaches. In: Amaral Junior, A.d., Almeida, L.d., Klein Vieira, L. (eds) Sustainable Consumption. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16985-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16985-5_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16984-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16985-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics