Skip to main content

Fast Adaptive Blockchain’s Consensus Algorithm via Wlan Mesh Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Security with Intelligent Computing and Big-data Services (SICBS 2018)

Abstract

This paper presents a decentralised and fast adaptive block chain’s consensus algorithm with maximum voter privacy using wlan mesh network. The algorithm is suitable for consortium blockchain and private blockchain, and is written as a smart contract for Hyperledger Fabric. Unlike previously proposed blockchain’s consensus protocols, this is the first implementation that does not rely on any trusted authority to compute the tally or to protect the voter’s privacy. Instead, the algorithm is a fast adaptive protocol, and each voter is in control of the privacy of their own vote such that it can only be breached by a full collusion involving all other voters. The execution of the protocol is enforced using the consensus mechanism that also secures the Fabric blockchain. This paper tests the implementation on Fabric’s official test network to demonstrate its feasibility. Also, this paper provides a computational breakdown of its execution cost.

Supported by organization X.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

  2. Higgins, S.: IBM invests \$ 200 million in blockchain-powered IoT (2016). http://www.coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain-iot-office/

  3. Clark, J., Essex, A.: CommitCoin: carbon dating commitments with bitcoin. In: Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ekblaw, A., Azaria, A., Halamka, J. D., Lippman, A.: A case study for blockchain in healthcare:medrec prototype for electronic health records and medical research data (2016). http://dci.mit.edu/assets/papers/eckblaw.pdf

  5. International Association for Cryptologic Research: About the helios system (2016). http://www.iacr.org/elections/eVoting/about-helios.html

  6. Adida, B.: Helios: Web-based open-audit voting. In: USENIX Security Symposium, vol. 17, pp. 335–348 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen, G.T., Kim, K.: A survey about consensus algorithms used in blockchain. J. Inf. Process. Syst. 14(1), 101–128 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gramoli, V.: From blockchain consensus back to Byzantine consensus. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, C., Yang, Z., Zheng, Z.L.: Game dilemma analysis and optimization of PoW consensus algorithm. Acta Autom. Sin. 43(9), 1520–1531 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Leng, K., Bi, Y., Jing, L., Fu, H.C.: Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 86, 641–649 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, T., Huang, X., Zhou, L.L.: Research on blockchain consistency algorithm with state legality verification. Comput. Eng. 44(1), 160–164 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, P., Guo, F., Liang, K., Lai, J., Wen, Q.: Searchain: blockchain-based private keyword search in decentralized storage. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim, H.W., Jeong, Y.S.: Secure authentication-management human-centric scheme for trusting personal resource information on mobile cloud computing with blockchain. Hum. Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 8(1), 11 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, S.J., Cai, J., Chen, Z.H.: Byzantine consensus algorithm based on Gossip protocol. Comput. Sci. 45(2), 20–24 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuan, C., Xu, M.X., Si, X.M.: Optimization scheme of consensus algorithm based on aggregation signature. Comput. Sci. 45(2) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Porat, A., Pratap, A., Shah, P.: Blockchain consensus: an analysis of proof-of-work and its applications (2018). http://www.scs.stanford.edu

  17. Bach, L., Mihaljević, B., Žagar, M.: Comparative analysis of blockchain consensus algorithms. In: 41st International Convention for Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feng, L., Zhang, H., Tsai, W.T., Sun, S.: System architecture for high-performance permissioned blockchains. Front. Comput. Sci., 1–15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. David, S., Noah, Y., Arthur, B.: The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm. Ripple Labs Inc., San Francisco (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hao, F., Ryan, P.Y., Zielinski, P.: Anonymous voting by two-round public discussion. IET Inf. Secur. 4(2), 62–67 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schnorr, C.P.: Efficient signature generation by smart cards. J. Cryptol. 4(3), 161–174 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fiat, A., Shamir, A.: How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature problems. In: Odlyzko, A.M. (eds.) Crypto 1986. LNCS, vol. 263, pp. 186–194 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingzhe Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jiang, X., Liu, M., Zhao, F., Zhou, Q., Wang, R. (2020). Fast Adaptive Blockchain’s Consensus Algorithm via Wlan Mesh Network. In: Yang, CN., Peng, SL., Jain, L. (eds) Security with Intelligent Computing and Big-data Services. SICBS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16946-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics