Abstract
Open innovation tends to be one of the hottest topic in innovation management. Open innovation tends to be very much related with enterprise growth. The purpose of this paper is to present a literature review related to open innovation and open innovation models and how they affect enterprise growth. The book chapter represents the importance of innovation and open innovation overall and open innovation. Special emphasize in this paper is given to the evolution of open innovation models and how this has influence enterprise effectiveness and efficiency which further influence enterprise growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Afonso, O., Monteiro, S., & Thompson, M. J. R. (2010). A growth model for the Quadruple Helix innovation theory (NIPE Working Paper 12). Braga: Universidade do Minho.
Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models. Tampere: Institute for Social Research, University of Tampere.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361–379.
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419–451.
Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.
Campanella, F., Della Peruta, M. R., Bresciani, S., & Dezi, L. (2017). Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: An empirical verification in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 267–284.
Campbell, D. F. J., & Güttel, W. H. (2005). Knowledge production of firms: Research networks and the ‘scientification’ of business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(1/2), 152–175.
Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). Academic firm. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Springer.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and Quintuple Helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327.
Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.
Carayannis, E. G., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2017). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): Concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 460–484.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41.
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chesbrough, H., Ahern, S., Finn, M., & Guerraz, S. (2006). Business models for technology in the developing world: The role of non-governmental organizations. California Management Review, 48(3), 48–61.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., Bakici, T., & Lopez-Vega, H. (2011). Open innovation and public policy in Europe. London: Science Business Publishing.
Curley, M., & Salmelin, B. (2013). Open innovation 2.0: A new paradigm. OISPG White Paper, pp. 1–12.
de Araújo Burcharth, A. L., Knudsen, M. P., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149–161.
Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 3, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0042-y.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
Ferrary, M. (2011). Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm. European Management Journal, 29(3), 181–192.
Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–350.
Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.
Ingenbleek, P. T. M., & Backus, G. B. C. (2015). Organizing open innovation for sustainability. In A. Brem & É. Viardot (Eds.), Adoption of innovation. Cham: Springer.
Kennedy, S., Whiteman, G., & van den Ende, J. (2016). Radical innovation for sustainability: The power of strategy and open innovation. Long Range Planning, 50, 712–725.
Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.
Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 11.
Melese, T., Lin, S. M., Chang, J. L., & Cohen, N. H. (2009). Open innovation networks between academia and industry: An imperative for breakthrough therapies. Nature Medicine, 15(5), 502.
Miller, K., McAdam, R., Moffett, S., Alexander, A., & Puthusserry, P. (2016). Knowledge transfer in university Quadruple Helix ecosystems: An absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management, 46(2), 383–399.
Parveen, S., Senin, A. A., & Umar, A. (2015). Organization culture and open innovation: A Quadruple Helix open innovation model approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1S), 335–342.
Rauter, R., Perl-Vorbach, E., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Is open innovation supporting sustainable innovation? Findings based on a systematic, explorative analysis of existing literature. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 11(2–3), 249–270.
Rexhepi, G. (2015). Entering new markets: Strategies for internationalization of family businesses. In Family businesses in transition economies (pp. 293–303). Cham: Springer.
Rexhepi, G., & Berisha, B. (2017). The effects of emotional intelligence in managing changes: An entrepreneurial perspective. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(2–3), 237–251.
Rexhepi, G., Ramadani, V., Rahdari, A., & Anggadwita, G. (2017). Models and strategies of family businesses internationalization: A conceptual framework and future research directions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(2), 248–260.
Sarkar, S., & Costa, A. I. (2008). Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(11), 574–580.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Routledge.
Suklev, B., & Rexhepi, G. (2013). Growth strategies of entrepreneurial businesses: Evidence from Macedonia. In Entrepreneurship in the Balkans (pp. 77–87). Berlin: Springer.
Syla, S., & Rexhepi, G. (2013). Quality circles: What do they mean and how to implement them? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(12), 243.
Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251–258.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rexhepi, G., Abazi, H., Rahdari, A., Angelova, B. (2019). Open Innovation Models for Increased Innovation Activities and Enterprise Growth. In: Rexhepi, G., Hisrich, R.D., Ramadani, V. (eds) Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16912-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16912-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16911-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16912-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)