Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship pp 37–49Cite as

Open Innovation Models for Increased Innovation Activities and Enterprise Growth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Open innovation tends to be one of the hottest topic in innovation management. Open innovation tends to be very much related with enterprise growth. The purpose of this paper is to present a literature review related to open innovation and open innovation models and how they affect enterprise growth. The book chapter represents the importance of innovation and open innovation overall and open innovation. Special emphasize in this paper is given to the evolution of open innovation models and how this has influence enterprise effectiveness and efficiency which further influence enterprise growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afonso, O., Monteiro, S., & Thompson, M. J. R. (2010). A growth model for the Quadruple Helix innovation theory (NIPE Working Paper 12). Braga: Universidade do Minho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models. Tampere: Institute for Social Research, University of Tampere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001). Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 419–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruneel, J., d’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, F., Della Peruta, M. R., Bresciani, S., & Dezi, L. (2017). Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: An empirical verification in Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. F. J., & Güttel, W. H. (2005). Knowledge production of firms: Research networks and the ‘scientification’ of business R&D. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(1/2), 152–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. F. J., Carayannis, E. G., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). Academic firm. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and Quintuple Helix innovation concepts and the “mode 3” knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G., Meissner, D., & Edelkina, A. (2017). Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): Concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 460–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). The logic of open innovation: Managing intellectual property. California Management Review, 45(3), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing Innovation and Change, 127(3), 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Ahern, S., Finn, M., & Guerraz, S. (2006). Business models for technology in the developing world: The role of non-governmental organizations. California Management Review, 48(3), 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., Bakici, T., & Lopez-Vega, H. (2011). Open innovation and public policy in Europe. London: Science Business Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curley, M., & Salmelin, B. (2013). Open innovation 2.0: A new paradigm. OISPG White Paper, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Araújo Burcharth, A. L., Knudsen, M. P., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2014). Neither invented nor shared here: The impact and management of attitudes for the adoption of open innovation practices. Technovation, 34(3), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 3, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0042-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrary, M. (2011). Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm. European Management Journal, 29(3), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S., & Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingenbleek, P. T. M., & Backus, G. B. C. (2015). Organizing open innovation for sustainability. In A. Brem & É. Viardot (Eds.), Adoption of innovation. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S., Whiteman, G., & van den Ende, J. (2016). Radical innovation for sustainability: The power of strategy and open innovation. Long Range Planning, 50, 712–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0049-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2016). “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured? Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(1), 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melese, T., Lin, S. M., Chang, J. L., & Cohen, N. H. (2009). Open innovation networks between academia and industry: An imperative for breakthrough therapies. Nature Medicine, 15(5), 502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K., McAdam, R., Moffett, S., Alexander, A., & Puthusserry, P. (2016). Knowledge transfer in university Quadruple Helix ecosystems: An absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management, 46(2), 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parveen, S., Senin, A. A., & Umar, A. (2015). Organization culture and open innovation: A Quadruple Helix open innovation model approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(1S), 335–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauter, R., Perl-Vorbach, E., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). Is open innovation supporting sustainable innovation? Findings based on a systematic, explorative analysis of existing literature. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 11(2–3), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rexhepi, G. (2015). Entering new markets: Strategies for internationalization of family businesses. In Family businesses in transition economies (pp. 293–303). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexhepi, G., & Berisha, B. (2017). The effects of emotional intelligence in managing changes: An entrepreneurial perspective. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(2–3), 237–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rexhepi, G., Ramadani, V., Rahdari, A., & Anggadwita, G. (2017). Models and strategies of family businesses internationalization: A conceptual framework and future research directions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(2), 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S., & Costa, A. I. (2008). Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19(11), 574–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suklev, B., & Rexhepi, G. (2013). Growth strategies of entrepreneurial businesses: Evidence from Macedonia. In Entrepreneurship in the Balkans (pp. 77–87). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Syla, S., & Rexhepi, G. (2013). Quality circles: What do they mean and how to implement them? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(12), 243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaverbeke, W., Van de Vrande, V., & Chesbrough, H. (2008). Understanding the advantages of open innovation practices in corporate venturing in terms of real options. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(4), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. South-East European University, Tetovo, Macedonia

    Gadaf Rexhepi & Hyrije Abazi

  2. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Amir Rahdari

  3. University St “Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje, Macedonia

    Biljana Angelova

Authors
  1. Gadaf Rexhepi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyrije Abazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amir Rahdari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Biljana Angelova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gadaf Rexhepi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Economics, South East European University, Tetovo, Macedonia

    Gadaf Rexhepi

  2. College of Business Administration, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA

    Robert D. Hisrich

  3. Faculty of Business & Economics, South East European University, Tetovo, Macedonia

    Veland Ramadani

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rexhepi, G., Abazi, H., Rahdari, A., Angelova, B. (2019). Open Innovation Models for Increased Innovation Activities and Enterprise Growth. In: Rexhepi, G., Hisrich, R.D., Ramadani, V. (eds) Open Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16912-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation