Skip to main content

Skipping Two Layers in ResNet Makes the Generalization Gap Smaller than Skipping One or No Layer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Big Data and Deep Learning (INNSBDDL 2019)

Abstract

The ResNet skipping two layers (ResNet2) is known to have a smaller expected risk than that skipping one layer (ResNet1) or no layer (MLP), however, the mechanism of the small expected risk is still unclear. The expected risk is divided into the three components, the generalization gap, the optimization error, and the sample expressivity, and the last two components are known to contribute the fast convergence of ResNet. We calculated the first component, the generalization gap, in the linear case, and show that ResNet2 has a smaller generalization gap than ResNet1 or MLP. Our numerical experiments confirmed the validity of our analysis and the applicability to the case with the ReLU activation function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bartlett, P.L., Helmbold, D.P., Long, P.M.: Gradient descent with identity initialization efficiently learns positive definite linear transformations by deep residual networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bengio, Y., et al.: Learning deep architectures for AI. Found. Trends® Mach. Learn. 2(1), 1–127 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bousquet, O., Elisseeff, A.: Stability and generalization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2(Mar), 499–526 (2002)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Charles, Z., Papailiopoulos, D.: Stability and generalization of learning algorithms that converge to global optima. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hardt, M., Ma, T.: Identity matters in deep learning. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 630–645. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawaguchi, K.: Deep learning without poor local minima. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 586–594 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keskar, N.S., Mudigere, D., Nocedal, J., Smelyanskiy, M., Tang, P.T.P.: On large-batch training for deep learning: generalization gap and sharp minima. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning. Nature 521(7553), 436 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LeCun, Y.A., Bottou, L., Orr, G.B., Müller, K.R.: Efficient backprop. In: Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, pp. 9–48. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, H., Xu, Z., Taylor, G., Goldstein, T.: Visualizing the loss landscape of neural nets. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, S., Jiao, J., Han, Y., Weissman, T.: Demystifying ResNet. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01186 (2016)

  14. Montufar, G.F., Pascanu, R., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: On the number of linear regions of deep neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2924–2932 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raghu, M., Poole, B., Kleinberg, J., Ganguli, S., Sohl-Dickstein, J.: On the expressive power of deep neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2847–2854 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al.: ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 115(3), 211–252 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Saxe, A.M., McClelland, J.L., Ganguli, S.: Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Telgarsky, M.: Benefits of depth in neural networks. In: Conference on Learning Theory, pp. 1517–1539 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18J15055, JP18K19821, and NAIST Big Data Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasutaka Furusho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Furusho, Y., Liu, T., Ikeda, K. (2020). Skipping Two Layers in ResNet Makes the Generalization Gap Smaller than Skipping One or No Layer. In: Oneto, L., Navarin, N., Sperduti, A., Anguita, D. (eds) Recent Advances in Big Data and Deep Learning. INNSBDDL 2019. Proceedings of the International Neural Networks Society, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16841-4_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics