Skip to main content

On the Distinction Between Classical and Nonclassical Geographies: Some Critical Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1104 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

In Ontological Tools for Geographic Representation , Roberto Casati, Barry Smith, and Achille Varzi have formalized and introduced the (geo-ontological) distinction between classical and nonclassical geographies . Although that distinction makes no essential reference to maps, the authors have pointed out that the dichotomy can be useful to specify the kind of geography that is implied in the spatial representation . Thus, the aim of this paper is to showcase the main assumptions behind the distinction between classical and nonclassical geography and to present some possible issues arising from its application to cartographic representation . Accordingly, the first two sections offer a short introduction to the scopes of the ontology of geography , and to the main theoretical tools needed for advancing a (formal) theory of spatial representation . The third section shows some issues emerging from the application of the distinction between classical and nonclassical geographies to the cartographic representation , by discussing (and expanding) the list of examples provided by the three authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, according to Pesaresi (2017), the ontology behind GIS could be more extensive than the three points presented here.

  2. 2.

    For an analysis of the notion of “classical geography ” in a geographical context , see Lukermann (1961), Geus and Thiering (2014).

  3. 3.

    Accordingly, Italy might also consider Kosovo as a nonspatial geographical entity, at least in this specific context .

  4. 4.

    To be more precise, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic is a non-UN member state recognized only by few UN member states; the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic is a non-UN member state recognized only by non-UN member states; the Republic of Somaliland is a non-UN member state not recognized by any state.

References

  • Berque A (2000) Ecoumène: introduction à l’étude des milieux humains. Belin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser M (2014) Ontology and indigeneity: on the political ontology of heterogenous assemblages. Cult Geogr 21(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boria E (2013) Genealogie intellettuali e discontinuità nazionali nella storia della cartografia. Bollettino della Società Geografica italiana 6(3):443–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant LR (2014) Onto-cartography. an ontology of machines and media. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati R, Smith B, Varzi AC (1998) Ontological tools for geographic representation. In: Guarino N (ed) Formal ontology in information systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati R, Varzi AC (1999) Parts and places. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean M (2010) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden S (2003) Reading genealogy as historical ontology. In: Milchman A, Rosenberg A (eds) Foucault and heidegger: critical encounters. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar A (2007) The ‘ontological turn’ in social theory. Trans Inst Br Geogr 32(1):106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geus K, Thiering M (2014) Common sense geography and mental modelling: setting the stage. In: Geus K, Thiering M (eds) Features of common sense geography. implicit knowledge structures in ancient geographical texts. LIT, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (2002) Historical ontology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2007) The Kantian roots of Foucault’s dilemmas. In: Crampton JW, Elden S (eds) Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Ashgate, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Joronen M (2013) Heidegger, event and the ontological politics of the site. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38(4):627–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joronen M, Häkli J (2017) Politicizing ontology. Prog Hum Geogr 41(5):567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch S (2013) Cultural geography I Materialist turns. Prog Hum Geogr 37(3):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law J, Lien ME (2012) Slippery: field notes in empirical ontology. Soc Stud Sci 43(3):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckermann F (1961) The Concept of Location in Classical Geography. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 51(2):194–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Smith B, Tversky B (1999) Ontology and geographic objects: an empirical study of cognitive categorization. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Proceedings of spatial information theory. cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. international conference COSIT’99 stade, Germany, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaresi C (2017) Applicazioni GIS. Principi metodologici e linee di ricerca. Esercitazioni ed esemplificazioni guida. Torino, Utet

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffestin C (2012) Space, territory, and territoriality. Environ. Plan. D: Soc. Space 30(1):121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts T (2014) From things to events: whitehead and the materiality. Environ and Plan D: Soc Space 32:968–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki T (2003) A Nnew societist social ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33(2):174–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw IG, Meehan K (2013) Force-full: power, politics and object-oriented philosophy. Area 45(2):216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons P (1987) Parts: an essay in ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1994) Fiat objects. In: Guarino N, Pribbenow S, Vieu L (eds) Parts and wholes: conceptual part-whole relations and formal mereology. proceedings of the ECAI94 workshop, ECCAI, Amsterdam, pp 15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1995) On drawing lines on a map. In: Frank A, Kuhn W (eds) Spatial information theory—a theoretical basis for GIS. proceedings, international conference Cosit’95, semmering, Austria ( Lecture notes in computer science), vol 988. Springer, Berlin, pp 475–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (1996) Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Knowl Eng 20:287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Mark DM (1998) Ontology and geographic kinds. In: Poiker TK, Chrisman N (eds) Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on spatial data handling. International Geographical Union, Burnaby, British Columbia, pp 308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Mark DM (2001) Geographical categories: an ontological investigation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 15(7), 591–612. http://idwebhost-202-147.ethz.ch/Courses/geog231/SmithMark_GeographicalCategories_IJGIS2001@2005-10-19T07%3B30%3B52.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B, Varzi AC (2000) Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philos Phenomenol Res 60(2):401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer S (2013) Human geography without hierarchy. Prog Hum Geogr 38(3):402–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambassi T (2016) Rethinking geo-ontologies from a philosophical point of view. J Res Didact Geogr (J-READING), 2(5), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.4458/7800-04

  • Tambassi T (2017a) The philosophy of geo-ontologies. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambassi T (2017b) A geographical taxonomy for geo-ontologies. Axiomathes 27(4):355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-016-9309-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambassi T (2018a) Introduzione. Filosofia della geografia. Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche. Geografia 30(2):9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambassi T (2018b) Ontologia della geografia e rappresentazioni cartografiche: uno spunto critico. Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, serie 14, 1(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.13128/bsgi.v1i1.86

  • Vallega A (1995) La regione, sistema territoriale sostenibile. Compendio di geografia regionale sistematica. Mursia, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Varzi AC (2007) Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes and location. In: Aiello M, Pratt-Hartmann I, van Benthem J (eds) Handbook of spatial logics. Springer, Berlin, pp 945–1038

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore S (2013) Earthly powers and affective environments: an ontological politics of flood risk. Theory Cult Soc 30(7–8):33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is a partial translation of Tambassi (2018b). Ontologia della geografia e rappresentazioni cartografiche: uno spunto critico. Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, 1(1), 19–26. Doi:https://doi.org/10.13128/bsgi.v1i1.86. Online: https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/bsgi/article/view/86, with some minor revisions. I am grateful to the publisher (Firenze University Press) and the editor (Margherita Azzari) for permission to use the material in question. Sections 2 has also some overlaps with Tambassi (2017a). Thanks are due to Giulia Lasagni and Paola Zamperlin. They know why.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy Tambassi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tambassi, T. (2019). On the Distinction Between Classical and Nonclassical Geographies: Some Critical Remarks. In: Tambassi, T. (eds) The Philosophy of GIS. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16829-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics