Skip to main content

Unpacking the “I” in GIS: Information, Ontology, and the Geographic World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of GIS

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Abstract

As a tool dealing with information rather than matter, GIS shares with other information technologies the conceptual challenges of its medium. For a number of years now, ontology development has helped harness the complexity of the notion of information and has emerged as an effective means for improving the fitness for use of information products. More recently, the broadening range of users and user needs has led to increasing calls for “lightweight” ontologies very different in structure, expressivity, and scope from the traditional foundational or domain-oriented ones. This paper outlines a conceptual model suitable for generating micro-ontologies of geographic information tailored to specific user needs and purposes, while avoiding the traps of relativism that ad hoc efforts might engender. The model focuses on the notion of information decomposed into three interrelated “views”: that of measurements and formal operations on these, that of semantics that provide the meaning, and that of the context within which the information is interpreted and used. Together, these three aspects enable the construction of micro-ontologies, which correspond to user-motivated selections of measurements to fit particular, task-specific interpretations. The model supersedes the conceptual framework previously proposed by the author (Couclelis, Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(12):1785–1809, 2010), which now becomes the semantic view. In its new role, the former framework allows informational threads to be traced through a nested sequence of layers of decreasing semantic richness, guided by user purpose. “Purpose” is here seen as both the interface between micro-ontologies and the social world that motivates user needs and perspectives, and as the primary principle in the selection and interpretation of Information most appropriate for the representational task at hand. Thus, the “I” in GIS also stands for the Individual whose need the tool serves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This expression is used to avoid suggesting that the sequence described here has empirically established cognitive/psychological validity (although it may), or that human cognition is not relevant to ontology development (which of course it is).

  2. 2.

    Fields and object are the two fundamental forms of representation in geographic information science. Much attention has been directed towards clarifying their logical relationships and formalizing their integration (Couclelis 1992; Galton 2001; Goodchild et al. 2007; Kjenstad 2006; Voudouris 2010). Note that the distinction between fields and objects qua representation forms is entirely a semantic issue. Raw measurements do not support one or the other interpretation.

References

  • Adams BJ, Janowicz K (2011) Constructing geo-ontologies by reification of observation data. ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS. ACM Press, Chicago, pp 309–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgo S, Masolo C (2010) Ontological foundations of DOLCE. In: Poli R, Healy M, Kameas A (eds) Theory and applications of ontology: computer applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 279–295

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bouquet P, Ghidini C, Giunchiglia F, Blanzieri E (2003) Theories and uses of context in knowledge representation and reasoning. J Pragmat 35(3):455–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (1992) People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS. In: Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (2009a) Ontology, epistemology, teleology: triangulating geographic information science. In: Navratil G (ed) Research trends in geographic information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (2009b) The abduction of geographic information science: transporting spatial reasoning to the realm of purpose and design. In Stewart Hornsby K, Claramunt C, Denis M, Ligozat G (eds), Spatial information theory, 9th international conference COSIT’09, pp 342–356. Springer, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (2010) Ontologies of geographic information. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(12):1785–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AU (2003) Ontology for spatio-temporal databases. In: Koubarakis M, Sellis T (eds) Spatio-Temporal databases: the CHOROCHRONOS approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galton A (2001) A formal theory of objects and fields. In: Montello DR (ed) Proceedings, international conference COSIT 2001. Springer, Berlin, pp 458–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangemi A (2005) Ontology design patterns for semantic web content. In: Gil Y, Motta E, Benjamins VR, Musen MA (eds) The semantic web. Springer, Berlin, pp 262–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangemi A, Mika P (2003) Understanding the semantic web through descriptions and situations. In Meersman R, Tari Z, Schmidt D (eds), On the move to meaningful internet systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2003, pp 689–706. Springer, Berlin

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gangemi A, Presutti V (2010) Towards a pattern science for the semantic web. Semant Web J 0:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Yuan M, Cova T (2007) Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 21(3):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1993) A translational approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5(2):199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1995) Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Int J Hum Comput Stud 43(5–6):625–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz K, Hitzler P (2012) The digital earth as knowledge engine. Editorial. Semant Web 1(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavouras M, Kokla M (2008) Theories of geographic concepts: ontological approaches to semantic integration. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavouras M, Kokla M (2011) Geographic ontologies and society. In: Nyerges TL, Couclelis H, McMaster R (eds) The SAGE handbook of GIS and society. SAGE, London, pp 46–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kjenstad K (2006) On the integration of object-based models and field-based model in GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(5):491–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W (2003) Semantic reference systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(5):405–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W (2009) Semantic engineering. In: Navratil G (ed) Research trends in geographic information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rudiments of rough sets. Inf Sci 177:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce CS (1878/1998). The order of nature. Pop Sci (1878). Reprinted in Cohen MR (ed.) Chance, love, and logic: philosophical essays, Charles Sander Peirce. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst F (2007) Semantic reference systems for observations and measurements. PhD thesis, University of Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson EH (2010) An ontological analysis of states: organizations versus legal persons. Appl Ontol 5(2):109–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheider S (2011) Grounding geographic information in perceptual operations. PhD thesis, University of Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheider S, Kuhn W (2011) Finite relativistic geometry grounded in perceptual operations. In: Egenhofer MJ, Giudice NA, Moratz R, Worboys MF (eds) Proceedings of 11th international conference COSIT’11. Springer, Berlin, pp 371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheider S, Probst F, Janowicz K (2010) Constructing bodies and their qualities from observations. In AM. Galton and R. Mizoguchi (eds) Formal Ontology in Information Systems (pp 131–144): Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, FOIS 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle JR (1983) Intentionality: an essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (2010) Ontological realism: a methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Appl Ontol 5(3–4):139–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2010) In quite a state: defining what makes a country. Print edition, 62–63 Apr 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Voudouris V (2010) Towards a unifying formalisation of geospatial representation: the object-field model with uncertainty and semantics. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(12):1811–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Pei (2013) Non-axiomatic logic: a model of intelligent reasoning. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Couclelis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Couclelis, H. (2019). Unpacking the “I” in GIS: Information, Ontology, and the Geographic World. In: Tambassi, T. (eds) The Philosophy of GIS. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16829-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics