Abstract
Community action interreligious projects conform to Jonathan Sacks ‘side-by-side’ model of interreligious engagement. The projects investigated for this research, in particular those London projects in the Near Neighbours programme, were set up to bring neighbours of different faiths together and to collaborate with these neighbours in social action. This chapter considers the way religious thinking features and operates in a context where social, rather than theological factors play a prominent role. It explores this on three planes: private reasoning; public expression; social encounter. There is little tension between religious and secular thinking in the process. Religion is a powerful motivator to involvement, but non-religious humanitarian impulses work in the same direction. The expression of religious reasons in a public context faces different constraints, real or imagined. The social orientation of the projects supports secular framing; the overriding interests are human and humanitarian. Where the interreligious interactions enabled by the community action projects are concerned, religious thinking is incidental rather than necessary to the social processes of building relations, developing working partnerships and friendships. When religious discussion does happen, the form it takes tends to be sharing information about one another’s religious traditions, practices and beliefs in a comparative religion fashion.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
DCLG. 2008. Face-to-Face and Side-by-Side: A Framework for Partnership in our Multi Faith Society. Wetherby: Communities and Local Government Publications.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–25.
Ohrt, Anna, and Mehmet Kalender. 2018. Interreligious Practice in Hamburg. A Mapping of Motivations, Conditions, Potential Benefits and Limitations from a Participant’s Perspective. In Religion and Dialogue in the City. Case Studies on Interreligious Encounter in Urban Community and Education, ed. J. Ipgrave, T. Knauth, A. Körs, D. Vieregge, and M.V.D. Lippe, 55–64. Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
Sacks, Jonathan. 2007. The Home We Build Together: Recreating Society. London: Continuum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ipgrave, J. (2019). Case Study 4: Community Action Projects. In: Ipgrave, J. (eds) Interreligious Engagement in Urban Spaces. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16796-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16796-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16796-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)