Advertisement

Ethical Issues and Legal Frameworks in the Big Data Debate

  • Maria Cristina PaganoniEmail author
Chapter
  • 213 Downloads

Abstract

The chapter concentrates on regulatory and legal frameworks in data protection that attempt to respond to ethical issues posed by big data acquisition, processing, storage and use, especially in those instances in which it sidesteps current directives. The main focus is on the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), its inspiring principles, i.e. fairness, accountability and transparency, main actors, i.e. data subjects, controllers and processors, and criticalities. The discourse analysis of the document illustrates the complexity of data protection against the dematerialisation of the economy in the big data ecosystem and the difficulty to harmonise Member States’ multiple views on privacy. It explores the discursive overlap of law and ethics and the impact that the legal curb on data processing and repurposing is generating.

Keywords

Accountability Big data GDPR Legal discourse Privacy 

References

  1. Barnard-Wills, David. 2013. “Security, Privacy and Surveillance in European Policy Documents.” International Data Privacy Law 3, no. 3: 170–180.  https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipt014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass, Gary D. 2015. “Big Data and Government Accountability: An Agenda for the Future.” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy 11, no. 1: 13–48. https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/75432.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, Ian. 2013. “Will NSA Revelations Lead to the Balkanisation of the Internet?” The Guardian, 1 November. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/01/nsa-revelations-balkanisation-internet.
  4. Burt, Andrew, and Dan Geer. 2017. “The End of Privacy.” New York Times, 5 October. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/05/opinion/privacy-rights-security-breaches.html.
  5. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2012. Official Journal of the European Union C 326 (26 October): 391–407. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:12012P/TXT.
  6. Clifford, Damian, and Jef Ausloos. 2017. “Data Protection and the Role of Fairness.” CiTiP Working Paper 29/2017. Centre for IT & IP Law: KU Leuven. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3013139.
  7. Cobb, Stephen. 2016. “Data Privacy and Data Protection: US Law and Legislation.” ESET White Paper. ESET. https://www.welivesecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/US-data-privacy-legislation-white-paper.pdf.
  8. ———. 2018. “Data Privacy vs. Data Protection: Reflecting on Privacy Day and GDPR.” WeLiveSecurity, 25 January. https://www.welivesecurity.com/2018/01/25/data-privacy-vs-data-protection-gdpr.
  9. Connors, Emma. 2018. “Microsoft President Brad Smith Wants to Save the World from Cyber Warfare.” The Australian Financial Review (31 May). https://www.afr.com/afr-special/microsoft-president-brad-smith-on-the-dangers-of-a-connected-world-20180508-h0zs3c.
  10. Cool, Alison. 2018. “Europe’s Data Protection Law Is a Big, Confusing Mess.” New York Times, 15 May. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/15/opinion/gdpr-europe-data-protection.html.
  11. Council of Europe. 1981. “Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data.” European Treaty Series no. 108 (28 January). https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/108.
  12. Courtland, Rachel. 2018. “The Bias Detectives.” Nature 558, no. 7710 (20 June): 357–360. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05469-3.
  13. Craig, Paul. 2015. “Accountability.” In The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, edited by Anthony Arnull and Damian Chalmers, 431–454. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Data Protection Directive. 1995. “Directive 95/46/EC.” Official Journal of the European Communities 281 (23 November): 31–50.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, Jenny L., and Nathan Jurgenson. 2014. “Context Collapse: Theorizing Context Collusions and Collisions.” Information, Communication & Society 17, no. 4: 476–485.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. eu-LISA (European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice). 2018. “Data Protection Day 2018.” 29 January. https://www.eulisa.europa.eu/Newsroom/News/Pages/Data-Protection-Day-2018.aspx.
  17. European Union. n.d. “Regulations, Directives and Other Acts.” https://europa.eu/european-union/eulaw/legal-acts_en.
  18. Floridi, Luciano. 2016. “On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy.” Philosophy & Technology 29, no. 4: 307–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0220-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2017. “Group Privacy: A Defence and an Interpretation.” In Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technology. Philosophical Studies Series 126, edited by Linnet Taylor, Luciano Floridi, and Bart van der Sloot, 83–100. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Floridi, Luciano, and Mariarosaria Taddeo. 2016. “What Is Data Ethics?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, no. 2083: 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flowerdew, John, and John E. Richardson, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Forgó, Nikolaus, Stefanie Hänold, and Benjamin Schütze. 2017. “The Principle of Purpose Limitation and Big Data.” In New Technology, Big Data and the Law, edited by Marcelo Corrales, Mark Fenwick, and Nikolaus Forgó, 17–42. Singapore: Springer Nature.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5038-1_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freude, Alvar C. H., and Trixy Freude. 2016. “Echoes of History: Understanding German Data Protection.” Newpolitik, 1 October. Washington, DC: Bertelsmann Foundation. http://www.bfna.org/research/echos-of-history-understanding-german-data-protection.
  24. Froud, David. 2018. “GDPR: It’s Not Just about EU Citizens, or Residents.” Froud on Fraud Blog, 6 February. http://www.davidfroud.com/gdpr-not-just-eu-citizens-or-residents.
  25. GDPR EU.org. n.d. “Fines and Penalties.” https://www.gdpreu.org/compliance/fines-and-penalties.
  26. GDPR.Report. 2017. “GDPR: Guidelines and Consequences for Non-compliance.” 16 June. https://gdpr.report/news/2017/06/16/gdpr-guidelines-consequences-non-compliance.
  27. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 2016. “Regulation (EU) 2016/679.” Official Journal of the European Union (4 May): 1–68. https://eur-lex.europa.eu.
  28. GOV.UK. 1998. “Data Protection Act (DPA).” http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents.
  29. Hijmans, Hielke, and Charles Raab. 2018. “Ethical Dimensions of the GDPR.” In Commentary on the General Data Protection Regulation, edited by Mark Cole and Franziska Boehm, 1–14. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3222677.
  30. ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office). 2017. Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Data Protection (Version 2.2). 4 September. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/big-data.
  31. ———. 2018a. The Guide to Data Protection (Version 2.10.2). 8 February. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/big-data.
  32. ———. 2018b. Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (Version 1.0.17). 22 March. https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr.
  33. Kitchin, Rob. 2014a. “Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts.” Big Data & Society 1, no. 1: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2014b. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Kitchin, Rob, and Gavin McArdle. 2016. “What Makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the Ontological Characteristics of 26 Datasets.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1: 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716631130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lazarus, David. 2018. “Privacy Rights Remain Just an Illusion.” The Los Angeles Times, 5 January. http://www.latimes.com.
  37. Levy, Karen E. C., and David Merritt Johns. 2016 “When Open Data Is a Trojan Horse: The Weaponization of Transparency in Science and Governance.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715621568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madge, Robert. 2018. “GDPR’s Global Scope: The Long Story.” MyData Journal, 12 May. https://medium.com/mydata/does-the-gdpr-apply-in-the-us-c670702faf7f.
  39. Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13, no. 1: 114–133.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mazzocchi, Fulvio. 2015. “Could Big Data Be the End of Theory in Science? A Few Remarks on the Epistemology of Data-Driven Science.” Science & Society 16, no. 10: 1250–1255.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDermott, Yvonne. 2017. “Conceptualising the Right to Data Protection in an Era of Big Data.” Big Data & Society 4, no. 1: 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716686994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Metcalf, Jacob, and Kate Crawford. 2016. “Where Are Human Subjects in Big Data Research? The Emerging Ethics Divide.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Metcalf, Jacob, Emily F. Keller, and danah boyd. 2016. “Perspectives on Big Data, Ethics, and Society.” Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society (7 July): 1–23. http://bdes.datasociety.net/council-output/perspectives-on-big-data-ethics-and-society.
  44. Meyer, David. 2018. “Activists Are Already Targeting Google and Facebook Over Europe’s New Data Privacy Law That Went Live Today.” Fortune, 25 May. http://fortune.com/2018/05/25/google-facebook-gdpr-forced-consent.
  45. Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosa Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 2: 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Puaschunder, Julia M. 2017. “The Nudging Divide in the Digital Big Data Era.” International Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management 4: 11–12, 49–53. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3007085.
  47. Puaschunder, Julia M. 2018. “Nudgital: Critique of Behavioral Political Economy.” Proceedings of the 9th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 87–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3179017.
  48. Salmons, Janet. 2017a. “Getting to Yes: Informed Consent in Qualitative Social Media Research.” In The Ethics of Online Research (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 2), edited by Kandy Woodfield, 109–134. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2017b. “What Does ‘Informed Consent’ Mean Today?” MethodSpace, 21 March. https://www.methodspace.com/informed-consent-mean-today.
  50. Schadt, Eric E. 2012. “The Changing Privacy Landscape in the Era of Big Data.” Molecular Systems Biology 8, no. 1, article number 612.  https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2012.47.
  51. Selbst, Andrew D., and Julia Powles. 2017. “Meaningful Information and the Right to Explanation.” International Data Privacy Law 7, no. 4: 233–242.  https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tannen, Deborah, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schriffin, eds. 2015. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Second Edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, Linnet, Luciano Floridi, and Bart van der Sloot. 2017. Group Privacy: New Challenges of Data Technology. Philosophical Studies Series 126. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M., and Karen Mossberger. 2018. “Any Thing for Anyone? A New Digital Divide in Internet-of-Things Skills.” Policy & the Internet 54: 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Dijck, José. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12, no. 2: 187–208.  https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Veale, Michael, and Reuben Binns. 2017. “Fairer Machine Learning in the Real World: Mitigating Discrimination without Collecting Sensitive Data.” Big Data & Society 4, no. 2: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717743530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wachter, Sandra, Brent Mittelstadt, and Luciano Floridi. 2017. “Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation.” International Data Privacy Law (20 September): 1–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2903469.
  58. Wang, Amy B. 2017. “A Lawyer Rewrote Instagram’s Terms of Use ‘in Plain English’ So Kids Would Know Their Privacy Rights.” Washington Post, 8 January. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/parenting.
  59. Zödi, Zsolt. 2017. “Law and Legal Science in the Age of Big Data.” Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics 3, no. 2: 69–87.  https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v3i2.324.
  60. Zwitter, Andrej. 2014. “Big Data Ethics.” Big Data & Society 1, no. 2: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714559253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze della Mediazione Linguistica e di Studi InterculturaliUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations