Advertisement

Big Data in Discourse

  • Maria Cristina PaganoniEmail author
Chapter
  • 201 Downloads

Abstract

The chapter explains the meanings of big data and raises excitement and doubt over its use within the wider societal context. To introduce the critical features of big data analytics, it recapitulates the unfolding of scientific paradigms over history, with the framework of “data-driven” science currently taking shape amid contestation. It discusses how the big data debate urges insights from different disciplines to assay the epistemological, anthropological and ethical changes brought about by technology advancements. Academic conversations surrounding novel approaches to knowledge production, dissemination and research ethics are also summarised. Finally, a linguistic and discourse-analytic approach is seen as conducive to novel insights into three crucial domains, i.e., the global news media, healthcare and the recent regulation of data protection in the European Union.

Keywords

Big data Data-driven science Epistemology Ethics Ontology 

References

  1. Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete.” Wired, 23 June. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory.
  2. Andrejevic, Mark. 2014. “The Big Data Divide.” International Journal of Communication 8: 1673–1689. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2161.
  3. Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery, eds. 2015. Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bass, Gary D. 2015. “Big Data and Government Accountability: An Agenda for the Future.” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy 11, no. 1: 13–48. https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/75432.
  5. Boellstorff, Tom. 2013. “Making Big Data, in Theory.” First Monday 18, no. 10, 7 October. http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4869/3750.
  6. Bondi, Marina, Silvia Cacchiani, and Davide Mazzi, eds. 2015. Discourse In and Through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data.” Information, Communication & Society 15, no. 5: 662–679.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chandler, David. 2015. “A World Without Causation: Big Data and the Coming of Age of Posthumanism.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43, no. 3: 833–851.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815576817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Jonathan H., and Steven M. Asch. 2017. “Machine Learning and Prediction in Medicine—Beyond the Peak of Inflated Expectations.” The New England Journal of Medicine 376, no. 26: 2507–2509.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1702071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society. http://bdes.datasociety.net.
  13. Coveney, Peter V., Edward R. Dougherty, and Roger R. Highfield. 2016. “Big Data Needs Big Theory Too.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, no. 2080: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowls, Josh, and Ralph Schroeder. 2015. “Causation, Correlation, and Big Data in Social Science Research.” Policy & Internet 7, no. 4: 447–472.  https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox, Michael, and David Ellsworth. 1997. “Application-Controlled Demand Paging for Out-of-Core Visualization.” Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Visualization ’97, 235–244. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=267068.Google Scholar
  16. Crawford, Kate, Kate Miltner, and Mary L. Gray. 2014. “Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology.” International Journal of Communication 8: 1663–1672. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2167.
  17. Diebold, Francis X. 2012. “A Personal Perspective on the Origin(s) and Development of ‘Big Data’: The Phenomenon, the Term, and the Discipline.” Second Version, PIER Working Paper No. 13–003. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2202843.
  18. Fisher, Eran. 2010. “Contemporary Technology Discourse and the Legitimation of Capitalism.” European Journal of Social Theory 13, no. 2: 229–252.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010362289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Floridi, Luciano, and Mariarosaria Taddeo. 2016. “What Is Data Ethics?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, no. 2083: 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. French, Martin, and Gavin J. D. Smith. 2016. “Surveillance and Embodiment: Dispositifs of Capture.” Body & Society 22, no. 2: 3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034x16643169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frické, Martin. 2015. “Big Data and Its Epistemology.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, no. 4: 651–661.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodley, Dan. 2014. “The Posthuman.” Disability & Society 29, no. 5, 844–846.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.889416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham, Mark. 2012. “Big Data and the End of Theory?” Guardian, 9 March. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog.
  25. Halavais, Alexander. 2015. “Bigger Sociological Imaginations: Framing Big Social Data Theory and Methods.” Information, Communication & Society 18, no. 5: 583–594.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Halford, Susan, and Mike Savage. 2017. “Speaking Sociologically with Big Data: Symphonic Social Science and the Future for Big Data Research.” Sociology 51, no. 6: 1132–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517698639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hay, Tony, Stewart Tansley, and Kristin Tolle, eds. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.Google Scholar
  28. Herrman, John. 2017. “If Everything Can Be ‘Weaponized,’ What Should We Fear?” The New York Times Magazine, 14 March. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/14/magazine/if-everything-can-be-weaponized-what-should-we-fear.html.
  29. Hollinger, Veronica. 2009. “Posthumanism and Cyborg Theory.” In The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts, and Sherryl Vint, 267–278. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Kitchin, Rob. 2014a. “Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts.” Big Data & Society 1, no. 1: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2014b. The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Kitchin, Rob, and Gavin McArdle. 2016. “What Makes Big Data, Big Data? Exploring the Ontological Characteristics of 26 Datasets.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1: 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716631130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lohr, Steve. 2012. “How Big Data Became So Big.” New York Times, 11 August. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/12/business/how-big-data-became-so-big-unboxed.html.
  34. ———. 2013. “The Origins of ‘Big Data’: An Etymological Detective Story.” New York Times, 1 February. https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/01/the-origins-of-big-data-an-etymological-detective-story.
  35. Lupton, Deborah. 2014. Digital Sociology. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lycett, Mark. 2013. “‘Datafication’: Making Sense of (Big) Data in a Complex World.” European Journal of Information Systems 22, no. 4: 381–386.  https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lyon, David. 2014. “Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique.” Big Data & Society 1, no. 2: 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mah, Alice. 2017. “Environmental Justice in the Age of Big Data: Challenging Toxic Blind Spots of Voice, Speed, and Expertise.” Environmental Sociology 3, no. 2, 122–133.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1220849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markoff, John. 2009. “A Deluge of Data Shapes a New Era in Computing.” New York Times, 14 December. https://www.nytimes.com.
  40. Marr, Bernard. 2018. “Here’s Why Data Is Not the New Oil.” Forbes, 5 March. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/03/05/heres-why-data-is-not-the-new-oil.
  41. Mazzocchi, Fulvio. 2015. “Could Big Data Be the End of Theory in Science? A Few Remarks on the Epistemology of Data-Driven Science.” EMBO Reports 6, no. 10: 1250–1255.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Metcalf, Jacob, and Kate Crawford. 2016. “Where Are Human Subjects in Big Data Research? The Emerging Ethics Divide.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Metcalf, Jacob, Emily F. Keller, and danah boyd. 2016. “Perspectives on Big Data, Ethics, and Society.” The Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society. 7 July. http://bdes.datasociety.net/council-output/perspectives-on-big-data-ethics-and-society.
  44. Milan, Stefania. 2017. “Data Activism as the New Frontier of Media Activism.” In Media Activism in the Digital Age: Charting an Evolving Field of Research, edited by Goubin Yang and Viktor Pickard, 151–163. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nelson, Michael L. 2009. “Data-Driven Science: A New Paradigm?” EDUCAUSE Review 44, no. 4: 6–7. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2009/7/datadrivenscience-a-new-paradigm.
  46. O’Connell, Anne. 2016. “My Entire Life Is Online: Informed Consent, Big Data, and Decolonial Knowledge.” Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity, and Practice 5, no. 1: 68–93. http://journals.library.mun.ca/ojs/index.php/IJ/article/view/1523.
  47. Paganoni, Maria Cristina. 2017. “Discursive Pitfalls of the Smart City Concept.” In Media and Politics: Discourses, Culture, and Practices, edited by Letizia Osti, Bettina Mottura, and Giorgia Riboni, 434–451. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. http://www.cambridgescholars.com/media-and-politics.
  48. Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor. 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pentzold, Christian, and Charlotte Fischer. 2017. “Framing Big Data: The Discursive Construction of a Radio Cell Query in Germany.” Big Data & Society 4, no. 2: 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717745897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Portmess, Lisa, and Sara Tower. 2015. “Data Barns, Ambient Intelligence and Cloud Computing: The Tacit Epistemology and Linguistic Representation of Big Data.” Ethics and Information Technology 17, no. 1, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-014-9357-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pots, Marieke. 2014. How Big Data Became So Big: A Media-Archaeological Study of Transhistorical Ideas about Technology & the Rising Popularity of Big Data. Utrecht: Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl.
  52. Puschmann, Cornelius, and Jean Burgess. 2014. “Big Data, Big Questions| Metaphors of Big Data.” International Journal of Communication 8: 1690–1709. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2169.
  53. Reischauer, Georg. 2018. “Industry 4.0 as Policy-Driven Discourse to Institutionalize Innovation Systems in Manufacturing.” Technology Forecasting and Social Change 132, no. C: 27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rifkin, Jeremy. 2011. The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Roden, David. 2013. “Book Review: Braidotti’s Vital Posthumanism.” Humanity+ Magazine. 18 November. http://hplusmagazine.com/2013/11/18/bookreview-braidottis-vital-posthumanism.
  56. Shaw, Ryan. 2015. “Big Data and Reality.” Big Data & Society 2, no. 2: 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715608877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shin, Dong-Hee, and Min Jae Choi. 2015. “Ecological Views of Big Data: Perspectives and Issues.” Telematics and Informatics 32, no. 2: 311–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tannen, Deborah, Heidi E. Hamilton, and Deborah Schiffrin, eds. 2015. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Second Edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. van den Boomen, Marianne. 2014. Transcoding the Digital: How Metaphors Matter in New Media. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.Google Scholar
  60. van Dijck, José. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12, no. 2: 187–208.  https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Watson, Sara M. 2014. “Data Is the New ‘____’: Sara M. Watson on the Industrial Metaphor of Big Data.” DIS. http://dismagazine.com/discussion/73298/sara-m-watson-metaphors-of-big-data.
  63. ———. 2016. “Toward a Constructive Technology Criticism.” Tow Center for Digital Journalism White Papers. New York: Columbia University.  https://doi.org/10.7916/D86401Z7.
  64. Williams, Sierra. 2014. “Rob Kitchin: ‘Big Data Should Complement Small Data, Not Replace Them.’” LSE Impact of Social Sciences Blog, London School of Economics and Political Science, 27 June. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/06/27/series-philosophy-of-data-science-rob-kitchin.
  65. Woodfield, Kandy, ed. 2017. The Ethics of Online Research. Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Volume 2. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. World Economic Forum. 2016. “The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond.” 14 January 2016. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/.
  67. Zikopolous, Paul C., Chris Eaton, Dirk de Roos, Thomas Deutsch, and George Lapis. 2012. Understanding Big Data: Analytics for Enterprise Class Hadoop and Streaming Data. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  68. Zwitter, Andrej. 2014. “Big Data Ethics.” Big Data & Society 1, no. 2: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714559253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze della Mediazione Linguistica e di Studi InterculturaliUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations