Skip to main content

Conclusion: European Parliament Ascendant?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Parliament Ascendant

Abstract

In this chapter, we summarise and review the most important findings of the empirical case studies. We crystallise how in all of these cases the EP had considerable success in expanding its formal and informal powers by using its strategies skilfully. Furthermore, we systematically compare which strategies the EP used to widen its powers; how this varies between cases; and what accounts for this variation. Moreover, we explain why we observe variation in the degrees of formal or informal empowerment between cases of substantive policy areas. Based on our findings, this chapter reflects on the strengths and limitations of our theoretical argument, and we reflect on three counterforces to the EP’s self-empowerment: intergovernmentalism, over-constitutionalisation and agencification. Finally, we discuss the consequences of the EP’s successful self-empowerment. Despite existing counterforces, we argue that, by using certain strategies, the EP has been pushing the EU in the direction of parliamentary democracy. While we cannot see a fully fledged EU-wide parliamentary democracy any time soon, we contend that the EP has, on its own account and cooperating with actors with similar preferences, made significant progress in that direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartolini, S. (2006). Should the Union Be ‘Politicised’? Prospects and Risks. Politics: The Right or the Wrong Sort of Medicine for the EU? (Notre Europe Policy Paper, 2006(19)). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (2011). Governance and Institutions: Implementing the Lisbon Treaty in the Shadow of the Euro Crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(Annual Review), 103–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S. (2017). Intergovernmentalism in the European Union: A Comparative Federalism Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(4), 580–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasone, C. (2014). European Economic Governance and Parliamentary Representation: What Place for the European Parliament? European Law Journal, 20(2), 164–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (2015). The Democratic Costs of Constitutionalization: The European Case. European Law Journal, 21(4), 460–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2007). Political Opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puetter, U. (2014). The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riddervold, M., & Rosén, G. (2016). Trick and Treat: How the Commission and the European Parliament Exert Influence in EU Foreign and Security Policies. Journal of European Integration, 38(6), 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripoll Servent, A., & Trauner, F. (2014). Do Supranational Institutions Make A Difference? EU Asylum Law Before and After ‘Communitarization’. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1142–1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). Explaining the constitutionalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1148–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2016). De-Constitutionalization and Majority Rule: A Democratic Vision for Europe (MPIfG Discussion Paper, 2016(14)). Cologne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. K. (2018). The European Court of Justice and the Policy Process: The Shadow of Case Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Meyer, B. (2018, February 13). Capital’s Power Grab for Eurozone Enforcer. Politico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trauner, F. (2012). The European Parliament and Agency Control in the Area of Freedom. Security and Justice. West European Politics, 35(4), 784–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (2015). The European Council. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrienne Héritier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Héritier, A., Meissner, K.L., Moury, C., Schoeller, M.G. (2019). Conclusion: European Parliament Ascendant?. In: European Parliament Ascendant. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16777-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics