Abstract
This chapter examines the driving forces of the EP’s formal and informal institutional power gains in the EU’s legislative process. Over a period of around fifty years, the institutional rule went from giving the EP a merely consultative role in the legislative procedure to establishing it as a coequal legislator with the Council of Ministers under the ordinary legislative procedure. We assess the extent to which this development was accelerated by the EP itself and analyse which of its strategies succeeded or failed in widening the EP’s powers. The strategies of unilateral action, arena-linking and alliance are found to be most important in bringing about this outcome.
This chapter is largely based on Héritier (2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agence Europe. (1991, November 23). Europe, Bulletin Quotidien, Luzembourg, No. 5615.
Ariès, Q. (2016, July 14). EU’s Public Watchdog Calls for More Lawmaking Transparency, Politico. http://www.politico.eu/article/eus-public-watchdog-calls-for-more-lawmaking-transparency/. Accessed 19 Sept 2017.
Armstrong, K. A., & Bulmer, S. (1998). The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Beach, D. (2005). The Dynamics of European Integration, Why and When European Institutions Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boucher, S. (2006). Exploring Leadership Effectiveness: The Presidency of the European Commission. Florence: European University Institute.
Budden, P. M. (1994). The United Kingdom and the European Community 1979–1986: The Making of the Single European Act. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Committee on Institutional Affairs, Bourlanges/Martin Report (1995). 17.5.1995. Dury/Maij-Weggen Report, 13.3.1996.
Corbett, R. (1993). The Treaty of Maastricht: From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Harlow: Longman.
Corbett, R. (1998). The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., & Shackleton, M. (2000). The European Parliament (4th ed.). London: Harper.
Devuyst, Y. (1998). Treaty Reform in the European Union: The Amsterdam Process. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 615–631.
EP. (2017). Legislative Train 03.2017: Union of Democratic Change. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/pdfs/legislative-train-schedule-theme-union-of-democratic-change-03-2017.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2017.
EP Activity Report. (2004). EP Activity Report.
EP & European Commission Framework Agreement. (2010). Framework Agreement on Relations Between the European Parliament and the European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:304:0047:0062:EN:PDF. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.
Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2003). Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution Building in Europe. Governance, 16(4), 577–600.
Gazzo, M. (1985). Towards European Union: From the “Crocodile” to the European Council in Milan. Brussels: Agence Europe.
Gazzo, M. (1986). Towards European Union II: From the European Council in Milan to the Signing of the European Single Act. Brussels: Agence Europe.
Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hix, S. (2002). Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 259–280.
Lodge, J. (1998). Negotiations in the European Union: The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference. International Negotiation, 3(3), 481–505.
Maurer, A., & Wolf, M. C. (2017). Informal Leadership and Agenda-Shaping in the European Parliament—The Process, Institution and Impact of Own-Initiative Reports (1999–2016). Paper Presented at the Council for European Studies’ 24th International Conference Sustainability and Transformation, 12–14 July, Glasgow.
Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purposes and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
National Parliaments Etats de la reflexion sur la conference intergouvernementale. (1996, February 14). Etat de la reflexion des parlements nationaux sur la conference intergouvernementale de 1996. Brussels.
Panizza, R. (2015). EU Administrative Law. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2015/519207/IPOL_ATA(2015)519207_EN.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2017.
Ponzano, P., Hermanin, C., & Corona, D. (2013). The Power of Initiative of the EC: A Progressive Erosion? Brussels: Notre Europe.
Poptcheva, E. (2013). Parliament’s Role in Anti-crisis Decision-Making. Brussels: Library Briefing.
Rasmussen, A. (2007). Challenging the Commission’s Right of Initiative? Conditions for Institutional Change and Stability. West European Politics, 30(2), 244–264.
Rittberger, B. (2003). The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), 203–225.
Rittberger, B. (2005). Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Roos, M. (2017). Far Beyond the Treaties’ Clauses: The European Parliament’s Gain in Power 1952–1979. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 13(2), 1055–1075.
Ross, G. (1995). Jacques Delors and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schiffauer, P. (2004). Die Gestaltungskraft des Europäischen Parlaments im Prozess der Entstehung einer Verfassung der Europäischen Union. In Institut für Europäische Verfassungswissenschaften (Eds.), Die Europäische Union als Verfassungsordnung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.
Shackleton, M. (2000). The Politics of Codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 28(2), 325–342.
UK White Paper. (1996, March 12). Note on Quality of Legislation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Héritier, A., Meissner, K.L., Moury, C., Schoeller, M.G. (2019). The European Parliament in Legislation. In: European Parliament Ascendant. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16777-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16777-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16776-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16777-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)