Skip to main content

The European Parliament in Legislation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Parliament Ascendant

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

  • 504 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the driving forces of the EP’s formal and informal institutional power gains in the EU’s legislative process. Over a period of around fifty years, the institutional rule went from giving the EP a merely consultative role in the legislative procedure to establishing it as a coequal legislator with the Council of Ministers under the ordinary legislative procedure. We assess the extent to which this development was accelerated by the EP itself and analyse which of its strategies succeeded or failed in widening the EP’s powers. The strategies of unilateral action, arena-linking and alliance are found to be most important in bringing about this outcome.

This chapter is largely based on Héritier (2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agence Europe. (1991, November 23). Europe, Bulletin Quotidien, Luzembourg, No. 5615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariès, Q. (2016, July 14). EU’s Public Watchdog Calls for More Lawmaking Transparency, Politico. http://www.politico.eu/article/eus-public-watchdog-calls-for-more-lawmaking-transparency/. Accessed 19 Sept 2017.

  • Armstrong, K. A., & Bulmer, S. (1998). The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2005). The Dynamics of European Integration, Why and When European Institutions Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, S. (2006). Exploring Leadership Effectiveness: The Presidency of the European Commission. Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budden, P. M. (1994). The United Kingdom and the European Community 1979–1986: The Making of the Single European Act. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Institutional Affairs, Bourlanges/Martin Report (1995). 17.5.1995. Dury/Maij-Weggen Report, 13.3.1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1993). The Treaty of Maastricht: From Conception to Ratification: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1998). The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration. Basingstoke: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R., Jacobs, F., & Shackleton, M. (2000). The European Parliament (4th ed.). London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devuyst, Y. (1998). Treaty Reform in the European Union: The Amsterdam Process. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EP. (2017). Legislative Train 03.2017: Union of Democratic Change. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/pdfs/legislative-train-schedule-theme-union-of-democratic-change-03-2017.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2017.

  • EP Activity Report. (2004). EP Activity Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • EP & European Commission Framework Agreement. (2010). Framework Agreement on Relations Between the European Parliament and the European Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:304:0047:0062:EN:PDF. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.

  • Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2003). Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution Building in Europe. Governance, 16(4), 577–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzo, M. (1985). Towards European Union: From the “Crocodile” to the European Council in Milan. Brussels: Agence Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzo, M. (1986). Towards European Union II: From the European Council in Milan to the Signing of the European Single Act. Brussels: Agence Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2002). Constitutional Agenda-Setting Through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1998). Negotiations in the European Union: The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference. International Negotiation, 3(3), 481–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A., & Wolf, M. C. (2017). Informal Leadership and Agenda-Shaping in the European Parliament—The Process, Institution and Impact of Own-Initiative Reports (1999–2016). Paper Presented at the Council for European Studies’ 24th International Conference Sustainability and Transformation, 12–14 July, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purposes and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Parliaments Etats de la reflexion sur la conference intergouvernementale. (1996, February 14). Etat de la reflexion des parlements nationaux sur la conference intergouvernementale de 1996. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, R. (2015). EU Administrative Law. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2015/519207/IPOL_ATA(2015)519207_EN.pdf. Accessed 24 October 2017.

  • Ponzano, P., Hermanin, C., & Corona, D. (2013). The Power of Initiative of the EC: A Progressive Erosion? Brussels: Notre Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poptcheva, E. (2013). Parliament’s Role in Anti-crisis Decision-Making. Brussels: Library Briefing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, A. (2007). Challenging the Commission’s Right of Initiative? Conditions for Institutional Change and Stability. West European Politics, 30(2), 244–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2003). The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2005). Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, M. (2017). Far Beyond the Treaties’ Clauses: The European Parliament’s Gain in Power 1952–1979. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 13(2), 1055–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. (1995). Jacques Delors and European Integration. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffauer, P. (2004). Die Gestaltungskraft des Europäischen Parlaments im Prozess der Entstehung einer Verfassung der Europäischen Union. In Institut für Europäische Verfassungswissenschaften (Eds.), Die Europäische Union als Verfassungsordnung. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, M. (2000). The Politics of Codecision. Journal of Common Market Studies, 28(2), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK White Paper. (1996, March 12). Note on Quality of Legislation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrienne Héritier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Héritier, A., Meissner, K.L., Moury, C., Schoeller, M.G. (2019). The European Parliament in Legislation. In: European Parliament Ascendant. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16777-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics