Advertisement

Methodology and Case Selection

  • Adrienne HéritierEmail author
  • Katharina L. Meissner
  • Catherine Moury
  • Magnus G. Schoeller
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

This chapter serves to explain how we assess our theoretical expectations empirically by relying on the congruence method in combination with process-tracing. Further, it specifies our methods of data collection. Moreover, we explain the book’s case selection rationale covering the EP’s institutional empowerment (or lack of it) over time and across policies. Hence, in order to corroborate or falsify our propositions, European Parliament Ascendant includes positive cases of empowerment where the EP succeeded in achieving new institutional rights and negative ones in which it failed.

Keywords

Congruence method European Parliament Process-tracing 

References

  1. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bressanelli, E., & Chelotti, N. (2018). The European Parliament and Economic Governance: Explaining a Case of Limited Influence. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collier, D., Brady, H. E., & Seawright, J. (2010). Critiques, Responses, and Trade-Offs: Drawing Together the Debate. In H. E. Brady & D. Collier (Eds.), Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards (pp. 125–159). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Fromage, D. (2018). The European Parliament in the Post-Crisis Era: An Institution Empowered on Paper Only? Journal of European Integration, 40(3), 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Héritier, A. (2008). Causal Explanation. In D. della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (pp. 61–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Jupille, J., Carporaso, J. A., & Checkel, J. T. (2003). Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1/2), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meissner, K. L. (2016). Democratizing EU External Relations: The European Parliament’s Informal Role in SWIFT, ACTA, and TTIP. European Foreign Affairs Review, 21(2), 269–288.Google Scholar
  9. Ripoll Servent, A., & Trauner, F. (2014). Do Supranational Institutions Make a Difference? EU Asylum Law Before and After ‘Communitarization’. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1142–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). Explaining the Constitutionalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1148–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Roederer-Rynning, C. (2003). From ‘Talking Shop’ to ‘Working Parliament’? The European Parliament and Agricultural Change. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(1), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roederer-Rynning, C., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). Bringing Codecision to Agriculture: A Hard Case of Parliamentarization. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(7), 951–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosén, G. (2015). EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rosén, G., & Raube, K. (2018). Influence Beyond Formal Powers: The Parliamentarisation of European Union Security Policy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(1), 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Trauner, F. (2012). The European Parliament and Agency Control in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. West European Politics, 35(4), 784–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Van den Putte, L., De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2014). The European Parliament’s New Role in Trade Policy: Turning Power into Impact (CEPS Special Report No. 89). Brussels.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrienne Héritier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katharina L. Meissner
    • 2
  • Catherine Moury
    • 3
  • Magnus G. Schoeller
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Political and Social Sciences and Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced StudiesEuropean University InstituteSan Domenico di Fiesole, FlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Centre for European Integration Research, IPWUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Universidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Centre for European Integration Research, IPWUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations