Advertisement

Theoretical Argument and Expectations

  • Adrienne HéritierEmail author
  • Katharina L. Meissner
  • Catherine Moury
  • Magnus G. Schoeller
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

This chapter develops the book’s theoretical argument and expectations for which we draw on rational choice institutionalism as well as sociological institutionalism. First, in Chapter 2.1, we identify reasons for the EP’s empowerment based on rationalist bargaining theories of institutional change. We assume that actors such as the EP seek to maximise their institutional powers through the use of strategies. Chapter 2.1 develops a list of strategies and theorises the conditions of their success and failure. These strategies encompass delaying, issue- and arena-linkage, alliance-building, ‘moving first’ and sanctioning. Second, Chapter 2.2 develops a theoretical argument for the EP’s self-empowerment based on norm-based explanations which complements our rationalist bargaining perspective. Norm-based explanations hold that the belief in the EU as a democratic polity helps to explain institutional change to the benefit of the EP. In Chapter 2.2, we identify three mechanisms based on this approach: the logic of appropriateness, communicative action and rhetorical action. Relying on these three mechanisms, we develop a set of strategies of EP empowerment and theorise their conditions of success and failure. These strategies are providing expertise, shaming, and mobilising external actors or public opinion.

Keywords

European parliament Empowerment Informal rules Rational choice Institutionalism Sociological institutionalism Strategies 

References

  1. Bergström, C. (2005). Comitology: Delegation of Powers in the European Union and the Committee System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Checkel, J. T. (1999). Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 84–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Delreux, T., & Kerremans, B. (2010). How Agents Weaken Their Principals’ Incentives to Control: The Case of EU Negotiators and EU Member States in Multilateral Negotiations. Journal of European Integration, 32(4), 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elgström, O. (2000). Norm Negotiations: The Construction of New Norms Regarding Gender and Development in EU Foreign Aid Policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(3), 457–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elster, J. (1989). Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2003). Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution Building in Europe. Governance, 16(4), 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2004). Interorganizational Negotiation and Intraorganizational Power in Shared Decision Making: Early Agreements Under Codecision and Their Impact on the European Parliament and Council. Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1184–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Farrell, H., & Héritier, A. (2007). Codecision and Institutional Change. West European Politics, 30(2), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fouilleux, E. (2004). CAP Reforms and Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Another View on Discourse Efficiency. West European Politics, 27(2), 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gino, F., & Moore, D. (2008). Using Final Deadlines Strategically in Negotiation. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1(4), 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goetze, S., & Rittberger, B. (2010). A Matter of Habit? The Sociological Foundations of Empowering the European Parliament. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 37–54.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (1996). The European Nation State. Its Achievements and Its Limitations. On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship. Ratio Juris, 9(2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Héritier, A. (2007). Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurd, I. (2005). The Strategic Use of Liberal Internationalism: Libya and the UN Sanctions, 1992–2003. International Organization, 59(3), 495–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurd, I. (2008). After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jachtenfuchs, M., Diez, T., & Jung, S. (1998). Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Political Order. European Journal of International Relations, 4(4), 409–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jupille, J., Carporaso, J. A., & Checkel, J. T. (2003). Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1/2), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knight, J. (1995). Models, Interpretations and Theories: Constructing Explanations of Institutional Emergence and Change. In J. Knight & I. Sened (Eds.), Explaining Social Institutions (pp. 95–120). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
  23. König, T. (2008). Why Do Member States Empower the European Parliament? Journal of European Public Policy, 15(2), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. König, T., Tsebelis, G., & Debus, M. (2010). Reform Processes and Policy Change: Veto Players and Decision Making in the Modern Democracies. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Krasner, S. D. (1991). Global Communication and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics, 43(3), 336–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. (1986). The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gains. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Discovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meunier, S. (2007). Managing Globalization? The EU in International Trade Negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moravcsik, A., & Nicolaïdis, K. (1999). Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1), 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morin, J., & Gold, R. E. (2010). Consensus-Seeking, Distrust, and Rhetorical Entrapment: The WTO Decision on Access to Medicines. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pollack, M. A. (2008). Member-State Principals, Supranational Agents, and the EU Budgetary Process, 1970–2008. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1119108. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  35. Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.). (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Risse, T. (2000). Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization, 54(1), 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Risse, T. (2001). A European Identity? Europeanization and the Evolution of Nation-State Identities. In M. G. Cowles (Ed.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change (pp. 198–216). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Risse, T. (2004). Global Governance and Communicative Action. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 288–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Risse, T., & Kleine, M. (2010). Deliberation in Negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 708–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In T. Risse & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rittberger, B. (2003). The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rittberger, B. (2006). No Integration Without Representation! European Integration, Parliamentary Democracy, and Two Forgotten Communities. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1211–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rittberger, B. (2012). Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(S1), 18–37.Google Scholar
  44. Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). Explaining the Constitutionalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1148–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosén, G. (2015). EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosén, G. (2016). A Match Made in Heaven? Explaining Patterns of Cooperation Between the Commission and the European Parliament. Journal of European Integration, 38(4), 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saurugger, S. (2010). The Social Construction of the Participatory Turn: The Emergence of a Norm in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 49(4), 471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saurugger, S. (2013). Constructivism and Public Policy Approaches in the EU: From Ideas to Power Games. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 888–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization, 55(1), 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schimmelfennig, F. (2005). Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization, 59(4), 827–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schimmelfennig, F., Rittberger, B., Bürgin, A., & Schwellnus, G. (2006). Conditions for EU Constitutionalization: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1168–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sebenius, J. K. (1992). Challenging Conventional Explanations of International Cooperation: Negotiation Analysis and the Case of Epistemic Communities. International Organization, 46(1), 323–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sigel, R. (1965). Assumptions About the Learning of Political Values. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 361(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, K. E. (2004). The European Parliament and Human Rights: Norm Entrepreneur or Ineffective Talking Shop? (Dossier El Parlamento Europeo en la Política Exterior, 2004). Barcelona: Institut Universitari d’Estudis Europeus.Google Scholar
  55. Stacey, J., & Rittberger, B. (2003). Dynamics of Formal and Informal Institutional Change in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 858–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steinmo, S., & Thelen, K. (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stephen, M. D. (2015). Can You Pass the Salt? The Legitimacy of International Institutions and Indirect Speech. European Journal of International Relations, 21(4), 768–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tannenwald, N. (2005). Ideas and Explanation: Advancing the Theoretical Agenda. Journal of Cold War Studies, 7(2), 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ulbert, C., & Risse, T. (2005). Deliberately Changing the Discourse: What Does Make Arguing Effective? Acta política, 40(3), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wendt, A. (1998). On Constitution and Causation in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 24(5), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrienne Héritier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katharina L. Meissner
    • 2
  • Catherine Moury
    • 3
  • Magnus G. Schoeller
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Political and Social Sciences and Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced StudiesEuropean University InstituteSan Domenico di Fiesole, FlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Centre for European Integration Research, IPWUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Universidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  4. 4.Centre for European Integration Research, IPWUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations