Abstract
Theoretical and philosophical psychologists have made tremendous strides in bringing philosophy and critique to bear on psychological understanding. This chapter draws attention to a vein of work that supplements philosophical and critical analyses with studies of historical particularities in which the assumptions, aspirations, and strategies of psychologists take shape. By illuminating the conduct of psychology in the context of historically situated research programs and practices, this vein of work brings added clarity, force, and relevance to purely philosophical and critical analyses. Informing arguments evidentially with history and thick descriptions of concrete particulars can help make what theoretical and philosophical psychologists have to say more convincing. To illustrate, psychologism is presented as a style of reasoning that has dominated psychology and set the agenda for what counts as psychological phenomena and how they are to be investigated and understood. The chapter begins by defining styles of reasoning and their characteristics. Psychologism is then proposed as a style of reasoning, its assumptions are explained, and particularities of its procedure are described that create a possibility in which psychological properties are made intelligible and achieve ontological status. This is followed by an illustration using the research of attitudes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Amodio, D. M. (2014). The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 670–682.
Augoustinos, M., Walker, I., & Donaghue, N. (2014). Social cognition: An integrated introduction (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391–417.
Crombie, A. C. (1994). Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition: The history of argument and explanation especially in the mathematical and biomedical sciences and arts. London, UK: Gerald Duckworth & Company.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davidson, A. (2001). The emergence of sexuality: Historical epistemology and the formation of concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Elwick, J. (2012). Layered history: Styles of reasoning as stratified conditions of possibility. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, 619–627.
Fleming, D. (1967). Attitude: The history of a concept. In D. Fleming & B. Bailyn (Eds.), Perspectives in American history (Vol. 1, pp. 285–369). Cambridge, MA: Charles Warren Center in American History, Harvard University.
Forrester, J. (1996). If p, then what? Thinking in cases. History of the Human Sciences, 9(3), 1–25.
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.
Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effect of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–383). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hacking, I. (2006, April 11). Kinds of people: Moving targets. The Tenth British Academy Lecture, London, UK.
Hacking, I. (2012). ‘Language, truth, and reason’ 30 years later. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 43, 599–609.
Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London, UK: Sage.
Krosnick, J. A., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 21–76). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kusch, M. (1995). Psychologism: A case study in the sociology of philosophical knowledge. London: Taylor & Francis.
Macpherson, C. B. (1962). The political theory of possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson, C. B. (1973). Democratic theory: Essays in retrieval. Oxford: Clarendon.
Martin, J. (2005). Perspectival selves in interaction with other: Re-reading G. H. Mead’s social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 35, 231–253.
Martin, J. (2016). Studying persons in context: Taking social psychological reality seriously. New Ideas in Psychology, 44, 28–33.
Martin, J., & McLellan, A. M. (2013). The education of selves: How psychology transformed students. New York: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J., Sugarman, J., & Slaney, K. (2013). Editors’ introduction. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 1–20). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Mead, G. H. (1938). The philosophy of the act (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1999). Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. British Journal of Sociology, 50, 367–396.
Rose, N. (1996). Power and subjectivity: Critical history and psychology. In C. Graumann & K. Gergen (Eds.), Historical dimensions of psychological discourse (pp. 103–124). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (1998). Life, reason and history: Reading Georges Canguilhem today. Economy and Society, 27, 154–170.
Sampson, E. E. (1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 767–782.
Slife, B. D., & Williams, R. N. (1995). What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stanley, D., Phelps, E., & Banaji, M. (2008). The neural basis of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 164–170.
Sugarman, J. (2005). Persons and moral agency. Theory & Psychology, 15, 793–811.
Sugarman, J. (2009). Historical ontology and psychological description. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 5–15.
Sugarman, J. (2015). Historical ontology. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology (pp. 166–182). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Sugarman, J. (2017). Psychologism and the study of persons. New Ideas in Psychology, 44, 21–27.
Teo, T. (2009). Editorial. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 29, 1–4.
Thomas, W. I., & Zaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America, Vol. 1: Primary group organization. Boston, MA: Badger.
Wessely, A. (1991). Transposing ‘style’ from the history of art to the history of science. Science in Context, 4, 265–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sugarman, J. (2019). An Historical Turn for Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. In: Teo, T. (eds) Re-envisioning Theoretical Psychology. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16762-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16762-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16761-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16762-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)