Abstract
Earth scientists gather geological information from rocks in order to understand the geological processes better. It is compulsory to examine rocks in detail for reliable geological deductions. Petrographical analyses, which inspect the rocks in terms of their physicochemical composition and texture, represent the primary step for accurate geological interpretations. Microscopy stands as the most frequently used tool for petrographical observations, although it requires destructive sample preparation. Pyroclastic rocks, which are formed by explosive volcanic eruptions, are usually friable and delicate by nature. These rocks tend to suffer from destructive sample preparation processes for microscopic investigations and usually lose initial textural characteristics during cutting, lapping, or polishing. X-ray microtomography is the state-of-the-art, 3D imaging method which uses X-rays passing through the sample to obtain spatial and structural information on componentry. Since X-ray microtomography is a nondestructive technique, it can be considered as an excellent complement for conventional petrographical methods, especially for fragile samples such as pyroclastic rocks. Once the rock components have been identified by preliminary petrographical studies, 3D quantitative information can be achieved from tomography datasets using image processing. This chapter presents the essential steps for microtomography studies and demonstrates quantitative modal componentry analyses on various pyroclastic rocks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gualda GAR. Crystal size distributions derived from 3D datasets: sample size versus uncertainties. J Petrol. 2006;47(6):1245–54.
Baker DR, Mancini L, Polacci M, Higgins MD, Gualda GAR, Hill RJ, Rivers ML. An introduction to the application of X-ray microtomography to the three-dimensional study of igneous rocks. Lithos. 2012;148:262–76.
Boone M, Dewanckele J, Boone M, Cnudde V, Silversmit G, Van Ranst E, Jacobs P, Vincze L, Van Hoorebeke L. Three-dimensional phase separation and identification in granite. Geosphere. 2011;7(1):79–86.
Gualda GAR, Pamukcu AS, Claiborne LL, Rivers ML. Quantitative 3D petrography using X-ray tomography 3: documenting accessory phases with differential absorption tomography. Geosphere. 2010;6(6):782–92.
Aydar E, Schmitt AK, Cubukcu HE, Akin L, Ersoy O, Sen E, Duncan RA, Atici G. Correlation of ignimbrites in the central Anatolian volcanic province using zircon and plagioclase ages and zircon compositions. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 2012;213:83–97.
Chianese A. Characterization of crystal size distribution. In: Chianese A, Kramer HJ, editors. Industrial crystallization process monitoring and control. New York: Wiley; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527645206.ch1.
Rannou E, Caroff M. Crystal size distribution in magmatic rocks: proposition of a synthetic theoretical model. J Petrol. 2010;51(5):1087–98.
Anovitz LM, Cole DR. Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures. Pore-Scale Geochem Process. 2015;80:61–164.
Lofgren G. Spherulitic textures in glassy and crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res. 1971;76(23):5635.
Acknowledgments
This study is funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK Project No: 113Y439).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Çubukçu, H.E. (2020). Application of X-Ray Microtomography in Pyroclastic Rocks. In: Orhan, K. (eds) Micro-computed Tomography (micro-CT) in Medicine and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16641-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16641-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16640-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16641-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)