Skip to main content

Reimagining HBCU Leaders as Policy Actors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Examining Effective Practices at Minority-Serving Institutions

Abstract

This study takes a strengths-based approach in constructing a conceptual framework for how presidents of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) can employ and improve their current advocacy skillsets for use in the policy arena. Drawing on the literature on HBCU leadership and the higher education policy, this study reimagines the existing skills of HBCU leadership for the policy arena to encourage HBCU leaders to participate in policymaking and collaborate with other policy actors at both state and federal levels. I outline how current skills held by successful HBCU presidents—especially those of communication and collaboration—can make them successful policy actors who can not only advocate for their institutions, but also for educational inequalities still reflected in American educational policy. Recommendations for future approaches to expanding strengths-based research for HBCUs follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams v. Richardson, 351 F. Supp. 636 (D. C. Cir. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (2017). Social networks and social exclusion: Sociological and policy perspectives. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. (Ed.). (2017). Axial coding. In The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, W., & Gasman, M. (2014). America’s public HBCUs: A four state comparison of institutional capacity and state funding priorities. Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/340

  • Buras, K. L. (2011). Race, charter schools, and conscious capitalism: On the spatial politics of whiteness as property (and the unconscionable assault on black New Orleans). Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 296. Retrieved from http://her.hepg.org/index/6L42343QQW360J03.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, M. A. (2012). Institutional and noninstitutional actors in the policy process. Public Policy: The Essential Readings, 2, 199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commodore, F., Freeman, S., Gasman, M., & Carter, C. M. (2016). “How it’s done”: The role of mentoring and advice in preparing the next generation of Historically Black College and University presidents. Education Sciences, 6(2), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, I. I. (2017). HBCUs: Accreditation, governance and survival challenges in an ever-increasing competition for funding and students. Journal of Research Initiatives, 2(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dente, B. (2014). Who decides? Actors and their resources. In Understanding policy decisions (SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology) (p. 29). London, UK: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1999). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervarics, C. (1997). Washington UPDATE: HBCU leaders urge expansion of Title III and TRIO programs. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 13(23), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, N. D., & Gupta, A. (2012). Busting the myth: Understanding endowment management at public historically black colleges and universities. The Journal of Negro Education, 81(2), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esters, L., Washington, A., Gasman, M., Commodore, F., O’Neal, B., Freeman, S., & Jimenez, D. (2016). Effective leadership: A toolkit for the 21st-century historically Black college and university president. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Center for Minority Serving Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Jr., & Gasman, M. (2014). The characteristics of historically Black college and university presidents and their role in grooming the next generation of leaders. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Jr., Commodore, F., Gasman, M., & Carter, C. (2016). Leaders wanted! The skills expected and needed for a successful 21st century historically Black college and university presidency. Journal of Black Studies, 47(6), 570–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasman, M. (2007). Truth, generalizations, and stigmas: An analysis of the media’s coverage of Morris Brown College and Black colleges overall. The Review of Black Political Economy, 34(1–2), 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2010). Racial politics, litigation and Mississippi’s public Historically Black colleges and universities. Race, Gender & Class, 17(1/2), 241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R., Patton, L. D., & Wooden, O. S. (2009). Access and equity for African American students in higher education: A critical race historical analysis of policy efforts. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(4), 389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, R. (2014). Rethinking and reframing leadership of historically Black colleges and universities: A distributed perspective. Creative Education, 5(13), 1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1967). The American Negro college. Harvard Educational Review, 37(2), 3–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., Datta, A., & Jones, H. (2009). Knowledge, policy and power: Six dimensions of the knowledge–development policy interface. London, UK: ODi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., Jones, S., Elliott, K. C., Owens, L. R., Assalone, A. E., & Gándara, D. (2017). Outcomes based funding and race in higher education: Can equity be bought? London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumah-Abiwu, F. (2016). Beyond intellectual construct to policy ideas: The case of the Afrocentric paradigm. Journal of Pan African Studies, 9(2), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. M., Jr., & Keys, S. W. (2013). Repositioning HBCUs for the future. UNCF. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59552b72e3df28f18a06018a/t/59de8977e9bfdf96122f831e/1507756412263/Repositioning+HBCUs+for+the+Future.pdf

  • Lewis, N. R. (2017). Herstory: Exploration of the lived experiences of women who were first to lead an HBCU 1994 to 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S. R. (2008). On becoming a woman leader: Learning from the experiences of university presidents (Vol. 124). London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, C. M. (1993, May). Federal research and development funding at historically Black colleges and universities. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, E. A. (2002). Senior leadership in higher education: An outcomes approach. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, J. T. (2004). Introduction: Decision making in historically Black colleges and universities: Defining the governance context. Journal of Negro Education, 73, 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, E. C. (2010). The politics of determining merit aid eligibility criteria: An analysis of the policy process. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(1), 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Y., & Neumann, E. F. (1999). The president and the college bottom line: The role of strategic leadership styles. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(2), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, W. D. (2007). Leading where it counts: An investigation of the leadership styles and behaviors that define college and university presidents as successful fundraisers. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 7(4), 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, A. (2005). Portraits in leadership: Six extraordinary university presidents. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. T., Maramba, D. C., Arroyo, A. T., Allen, T. O., Boykin, T. F., & Lee, J. M., Jr. (Eds.). (2017). Effective leadership at Minority-Serving Institutions: Exploring opportunities and challenges for leadership. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. D. (1997). Power and politics: Federal higher education policymaking in the 1990s. SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, P. (2015). Neo-democracy in educational policy making: Teachers’ unions, education reform advocacy organizations and threats to public engagement in the new policy arena. Doctoral dissertation, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • PinteriÄŤ, U. (2014). Rethinking public policies. Nova Mesto: Faculty of Organization Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, M., Howlett, M. P., & Saguin, K. (2016). Measuring individual-level analytical, managerial and political policy capacity: A survey instrument. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research paper No. 16-07. Retrieved from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2777382 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2777382

  • Roach, R. (1996). POLITICS as it is played: Historically Black Colleges getting into the game of lobbying. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 13(18), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (2012). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report, 17(48), 1–17. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss48/3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Batz, C., Keith, M., Ng, V., Saef, R., & Howland, A. (2016). Competencies for state college and university presidents. Washington, DC: American Association of State Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffron, J. (2016, April 4). Failing HBCUs: Should they receive life support or the axe? Retrieved from https://www.jamesgmartin.center/2016/04/failing-hbcus-should-they-receive-life-support-or-the-axe/

  • Schexnider, A. (2017). Governance and the future of Black colleges. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2017/12/20/struggling-hbcus-must-consider-new-options-survival-opinion

  • Simon, E., Gold, E., & Cucchiara, M. (2011). The prospects for public engagement in a market-oriented public education system: A case study of Philadelphia, 2001–2007. In M. Orr & J. Rogers (Eds.), Public engagement for public education (pp. 276–300). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, R. A. (2010). Turnover: Selecting the next generation’s presidents. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(5), 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smerek, R. (2011). Sensemaking and sense giving: An exploratory study of the simultaneous “being and learning” of new college and university presidents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(1), 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1972). Black education: Myths and tragedies. New York, NY: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G., Wright, D., Perry, T., & Rankin, C. (2008). Historically black colleges and universities: Caretakers of precious treasure. Journal of College Admission, 201, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. (2012). A different world. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 29(15), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, R. (2016). Presidents for hire: HBCUs battle issues of an unusually high turnover of presidents and lack of leadership stability. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 33(14), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E., & Olswang, S. (1999). Peril or promise: The effect of desegregation litigation on historically Black colleges. Western Journal of Black Studies, 23(2), 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. L., Burt, B. A., Clay, K. L., & Bridges, B. K. (2018). Stories untold: Counter-narratives to anti-Blackness and deficit-oriented discourse concerning HBCUs. American Educational Research Journal, 1. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3102/0002831218802776

  • Wooten, M. E. (2015). In the face of inequality: How black colleges adapt. SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sosanya M. Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, S.M. (2019). Reimagining HBCU Leaders as Policy Actors. In: Palmer, R., Preston, D., Assalone, A. (eds) Examining Effective Practices at Minority-Serving Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16609-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16609-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16608-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16609-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics