Skip to main content

The Politics of Evil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 312 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures ((PSEF))

Abstract

The politics of evil refers to an invocation of evil in political rhetoric against a person or group that, intentionally or otherwise, stifles democratic debate, and can promote hate speech such as George W. Bush’s reference to the “Axis of Evil.” Labelling a group as evil taps into powerful imagery from religion, popular media, and other cultural sources. Drawing from a qualitative study with Grade 11 students and the concept of order-words from Deleuze and Guattari, this chapter examines the power the label of evil has in the context of the study of historical and contemporary events.

An earlier version of this chapter was published as: van Kessel, C. (2017). “A Phenomenographic Study of Youth Conceptualizations of Evil: Order-Words and the Politics of Evil,” Canadian Journal of Education, 40(4), 329–355.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    καλός κ ̓αγαθός (full form: καλός και αγαθός) is the masculine, singular, nominative form, and thus, the endings of the words would be different when referring to: other genders, in the plural, or when the phrase functions differently in a sentence (e.g., the nominative form as the subject of the sentence versus the accusative form as the object in a sentence).

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.642845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. J. (2015). Modern misogyny: Anti-feminism in a post-feminist era. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. (n.d.). Why are Muslims so evil? Yahoo Answers. Retrieved from https://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120309021220AAH26DR.

  • Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York, NY: Penguin. (Original work published in 1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, R. (2007). Doing focus groups. London, UK: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belt, A., & Belt, P. (2017). Teachers’ differing perceptions of classroom disturbances. Educational Research, 59, 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden, J. A., & Green, P. J. (2010). Relationality and the myth of objectivity in research involving human participants. In J. Higgs, N. Cherry, R. Macklin, & R. Ajjawi (Eds.), Researching practice: A discourse on qualitative methodologies (pp. 105–121). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. P. (1986). Cultural myths in the making of a teacher: Biography and social structure in teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 56, 442–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. R. (2011, February 20). Two types of assemblages. Larval Subjects. Retrieved from https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2011/02/20/two-types-of-assemblages/.

  • Bush, G. W. (2002, January 29). State of the union address. Presidential speeches archive. Charlottesville, VA: Miller Center. Retrieved from https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/presidential-speeches/january-29-2002-state-union-address.

  • Carlson, D. (1985). The cold war in the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 42, 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier-Reed, B. I., Ingerman, Å., & Berglund, A. (2009). Reflections on trustworthiness in phenomenographic research: Recognizing purpose, context and change in the process of research. Education as Change, 13, 339–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2008). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London, UK: Continuum. (Original work published in 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellefsen, L. (2016). An investigation into perceptions of Facebook use in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 5, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n1p160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabello, M. (2013, May 20). Thin privilege [Video web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPETV_Jw1XU.

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). The constructivist credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. (1992). Lewd women and wicked witches: A study in the dynamics of male domination. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitler, A. (2001). Mein Kampf. (R. Manheim, Trans.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published in 1925)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettunen, J., & Tynjälä, P. (2017). Applying phenomenography in guidance and counselling research. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2017.1285006. (Advance online publication).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, S. J., & Bass, A. R. (1985). A direct study of the halo effect. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 119(6), 535–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1985.10542924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J. C. (2011). Epistemologies of situated knowledges: “Troubling” knowledge in philosophy of education. Educational Theory, 61, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, J., & Holmström, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 2, 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. New York, NY: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddell, H. G., & Scott, R. (1996). A Greek-English lexicon. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, J. (2014). How Finnish upper secondary students conceive transgenerational responsibility and historical reparations: Implications for the history curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 515–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löfström, E., Nevgi, A., Wegner, E., & Karm, M. (2015). Images in research on teaching and learning in higher education. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 1, pp. 191–212). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220150000001009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21, 28–49. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189.

  • Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndalianis, A. (2012). The horror sensorium. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, C. (2010). “It’s not like [I’m] Chinese and Canadian. I am in between”: Ethnicity and students’ conceptions of historical significance. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38, 574–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, C., Sears, A., & Donaldson, S. (2008). Unreached and unreasonable: Curriculum standards and children’s understanding of ethnic diversity in Canada. Curriculum Inquiry, 38, 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2007.00398.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, A., & Britzman, D. P. (2003). Speculations on qualities of difficult knowledge in teaching and learning: An experiment in psychoanalytic research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390310001632135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, D. P. (1968). Cassell’s Latin dictionary. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberg, S. (Director). (1975). Jaws [Motion picture]. Universal City, CA: Universal Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. (1999). A letter to my children: Historical memory and the silences of childhood. In J. P. Robertson (Ed.), Teaching for a tolerant world, Grades K-6: Essays and resources (pp. 34–44). Urbana, IL: National Council for Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D., & Shamdasani, P. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, E. (2011). In the dust of this planet. Washington, DC: Zero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Kessel, C., & Crowley, R. M. (2017). Villainification and evil in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45, 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1285734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, K., Jaidin, H., Jawawi, R., Perera, J. S. H. Q., Salleh, S., Shahrill, M., & Sithamparam, S. (2017). How and what teachers learn from collaborative professional development. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6, 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-09-2016-0028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngblood Jackson, A. (2013). Posthumanist data analysis of mangling practices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 741–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathryn van Kessel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Kessel, C. (2019). The Politics of Evil. In: An Education in 'Evil'. Palgrave Studies in Educational Futures. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16605-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16605-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16604-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16605-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics