Skip to main content

Robotics in Spine Surgery: Uses in Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotics in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

In an effort to both improve accuracy of pedicle screw placement and limit soft tissue disruption, robotic guidance systems have emerged as an attractive alternative to freehand and navigated techniques. Especially effective in the setting of revision surgery with distorted anatomic landmarks or severe deformity, robotic guidance allows for safe and accurate placement of implants, as well as additional uses based on trajectories that planning with a robotic system affords. Additionally, minimally invasive techniques can be achieved with the robotic guidance systems in use today. Further advancements in technology are occurring rapidly, and the full potential of robotics in surgery is yet to be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kleck CJ, Cullilmore I, LaFleur M, Lindley E, Rentschler ME, Burger EL, et al. A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(6):1764–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lieberman IH, Togawa D, Kayanja MM, Reinhardt MK, Friedlander A, Knoller N, et al. Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part I--Technical development and a test case result. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(3):641–50; discussion -50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Togawa D, Kayanja MM, Reinhardt MK, Shoham M, Balter A, Friedlander A, et al. Bone-mounted miniature robotic guidance for pedicle screw and translaminar facet screw placement: part 2--Evaluation of system accuracy. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS129–39; discussion ONS39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lonjon N, Chan-Seng E, Costalat V, Bonnafoux B, Vassal M, Boetto J. Robot-assisted spine surgery: feasibility study through a prospective case-matched analysis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(3):947–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaines RW Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A(10):1458–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH, Arlet V. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(11):E465–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ledonio CG, Polly DW Jr, Vitale MG, Wang Q, Richards BS. Pediatric pedicle screws: comparative effectiveness and safety: a systematic literature review from the Scoliosis Research Society and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America task force. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(13):1227–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Devito DP, Gaskill T, Erickson M. Robotic-based guidance for pedicle screw instrumentation of the scoliotic spine. In: Spine Arthroplasty Society (SAS) 10th annual global symposium on motion preservation technology; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, Kochling M, Hoss N. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(17):E986–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu X, Ohnmeiss DD, Lieberman IH. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement: lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(3):661–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannestra A, Sweeney T, Poelstra K, Schroerlucke S. Surgical outcomes of robotic-guidance vs. freehand instrumentation: a retrospective review of 705 adult degenerative spine patients operated in minimally invasive and open approaches. Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SMISS) Annual Forum, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu X, Lieberman IH. What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(6):1839–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor R. A perspective on medical robotics. Proc IEEE. 2006;94:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isador H. Lieberman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bozzio, A.E., Hu, X., Lieberman, I.H. (2019). Robotics in Spine Surgery: Uses in Development. In: Lonner, J. (eds) Robotics in Knee and Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16593-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16593-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16592-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16593-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics