Abstract
Children engaged in offences tend to share certain common features: they are victims of multiple deprivations; most come from poor or dysfunctional families and had parents with lower levels of education. This does not mean, however, that deviant behaviour is the monopoly of children from lower-income groups. Evidence shows that children from middle- and high-income families also commit offences, but these tend to remain hidden in the data as most such cases are settled before they come to court. The law appears to be harshest, therefore, to those who are the most socially and politically vulnerable. Nevertheless, poverty cannot be considered as the root cause of offences by children as there are millions of poor children who are law-abiding. It is best regarded as one among many risk factors. The focus of this chapter is to conduct a critical analysis of the profile of children in conflict with law and to find a correlation between offences and socio-economic variables.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency, also known as the Riyadh guidelines, were adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly Resolution 45/112 of 14 December 1990. The guidelines complement the Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice adopted in 1985. Its guidelines recognize children as human being and discuss a positive and proactive approach to preventing the rise of crime in the youth population.
- 2.
Observation homes are institutions where children spend time during their trial period.
- 3.
Lower primary in India is from 1st to 5th grade schooling (age of entry 6 years–11 years).
- 4.
Upper primary is from 6th to 8th grade (12–14 years).
References
Agnew, R. & Broidy, L. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 275–306.
Black, D. (1976). The behaviour of law. New York: Academic Press.
Christie, G. (1999). Reducing and preventing violence in schools. Paper presented at the Children and Crime: Victims and Offenders Conference, held in Brisbane, 17–18 June. Retrieved from www.peacebuilders.com
Culberton, F. M., Ferel, C. H., & Gabby, S. (1989). Pattern analysis of Weschler intelligence scale for children-revised profiles of delinquent boys. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 651–660.
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496.
Deković, M., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Van As, N. M. C. (2003). Family predictors of antisocial behaviour in adolescence. Family Process, 42, 223–235.
Diaz, A., Belena, A., & Baguena, M. R. (1994). The role of gender in juvenile delinquency: Personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(2), 309–314.
Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38.
Farrington, D. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tony & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Farrington, D. (1987). Early precursors of frequent offending. In J. Q. Wilson & G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens (pp. 27–50). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Farrington, D. P. (1992). Juvenile delinquency. In J. C. Coleman (Ed.), The school years (2nd ed., pp. 123–163). London, UK: Routledge.
Fischer, D. G. (1984). Family size and delinquency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 527–534.
Freeman, R. (1996). Why do so many young American men commit crimes and might we do about it? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 25–42.
Gilmore, L. (1999). Pathway to crime prevention: Development and intervention approaches to crime in Australia. Canberra: Attorney General’s Department.
Gottfredson, G., & Gottfredson, G. (1985). Victimization in school. New York: Plenum Books.
Moffit, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.
Moffitt, T. E., Gabrielli, W. F., & Mednick, S. A. (1981). Socioeconomic status, IQ, and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 152–156.
National Crime Records Bureau, India. (2014). Crime in India, 2014 statistics. Retrieved from www.ncrb.nic.in.
Nelson, C. M., Rutherford, R. B., & Wolford, B. (Eds.). (1996). Developing comprehensive system that work for troubled youth. Richmond, KY: National Juvenile Detention Association.
Ojo, F. (1987). Socio-economic variable as determinants of academic performance in Nigerian universities. Unpublished Research paper, University of Lagos, Nigeria.
Quinsey, V. L., Skilling, T. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Craig, W. M. (2004). Juvenile delinquency: Understanding the origins of individual differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Moffit, T., & Lynam, D. (1999). Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure and self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 187–196.
Talaimanu, F. U. W. (2006). Youth social work enhanced by fa’asamoa imperatives: Patience, humility and balance. Social Work Review, 18(1), 42–46.
Weis, L. (1982). Ethnicity, gender and socio-economic status: Pattern of access in Ghanaian secondary schools. Nigerian Journal of Education, 2(2), 12–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parackal, S., Panicker, R. (2019). The Socio-economic Profile of Children in Conflict with the Law. In: Children and Crime in India. Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16589-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16589-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16588-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16589-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)