Skip to main content

The Socio-economic Profile of Children in Conflict with the Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Children and Crime in India

Abstract

Children engaged in offences tend to share certain common features: they are victims of multiple deprivations; most come from poor or dysfunctional families and had parents with lower levels of education. This does not mean, however, that deviant behaviour is the monopoly of children from lower-income groups. Evidence shows that children from middle- and high-income families also commit offences, but these tend to remain hidden in the data as most such cases are settled before they come to court. The law appears to be harshest, therefore, to those who are the most socially and politically vulnerable. Nevertheless, poverty cannot be considered as the root cause of offences by children as there are millions of poor children who are law-abiding. It is best regarded as one among many risk factors. The focus of this chapter is to conduct a critical analysis of the profile of children in conflict with law and to find a correlation between offences and socio-economic variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United Nations Guidelines for the Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency, also known as the Riyadh guidelines, were adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly Resolution 45/112 of 14 December 1990. The guidelines complement the Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice adopted in 1985. Its guidelines recognize children as human being and discuss a positive and proactive approach to preventing the rise of crime in the youth population.

  2. 2.

    Observation homes are institutions where children spend time during their trial period.

  3. 3.

    Lower primary in India is from 1st to 5th grade schooling (age of entry 6 years–11 years).

  4. 4.

    Upper primary is from 6th to 8th grade (12–14 years).

References

  • Agnew, R. & Broidy, L. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 34, 275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D. (1976). The behaviour of law. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, G. (1999). Reducing and preventing violence in schools. Paper presented at the Children and Crime: Victims and Offenders Conference, held in Brisbane, 17–18 June. Retrieved from www.peacebuilders.com

  • Culberton, F. M., Ferel, C. H., & Gabby, S. (1989). Pattern analysis of Weschler intelligence scale for children-revised profiles of delinquent boys. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deković, M., Janssens, J. M. A. M., & Van As, N. M. C. (2003). Family predictors of antisocial behaviour in adolescence. Family Process, 42, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, A., Belena, A., & Baguena, M. R. (1994). The role of gender in juvenile delinquency: Personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(2), 309–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35(1), 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tony & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1987). Early precursors of frequent offending. In J. Q. Wilson & G. C. Loury (Eds.), From children to citizens (pp. 27–50). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1992). Juvenile delinquency. In J. C. Coleman (Ed.), The school years (2nd ed., pp. 123–163). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. G. (1984). Family size and delinquency. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 58, 527–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (1996). Why do so many young American men commit crimes and might we do about it? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(1), 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, L. (1999). Pathway to crime prevention: Development and intervention approaches to crime in Australia. Canberra: Attorney General’s Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G., & Gottfredson, G. (1985). Victimization in school. New York: Plenum Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moffit, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behaviour: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Gabrielli, W. F., & Mednick, S. A. (1981). Socioeconomic status, IQ, and delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 152–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Crime Records Bureau, India. (2014). Crime in India, 2014 statistics. Retrieved from www.ncrb.nic.in.

  • Nelson, C. M., Rutherford, R. B., & Wolford, B. (Eds.). (1996). Developing comprehensive system that work for troubled youth. Richmond, KY: National Juvenile Detention Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo, F. (1987). Socio-economic variable as determinants of academic performance in Nigerian universities. Unpublished Research paper, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Skilling, T. A., Lalumiere, M. L., & Craig, W. M. (2004). Juvenile delinquency: Understanding the origins of individual differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Moffit, T., & Lynam, D. (1999). Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: Class, race, test motivation, school failure and self-control? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talaimanu, F. U. W. (2006). Youth social work enhanced by fa’asamoa imperatives: Patience, humility and balance. Social Work Review, 18(1), 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. (1982). Ethnicity, gender and socio-economic status: Pattern of access in Ghanaian secondary schools. Nigerian Journal of Education, 2(2), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saju Parackal .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parackal, S., Panicker, R. (2019). The Socio-economic Profile of Children in Conflict with the Law. In: Children and Crime in India. Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16589-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16589-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16588-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16589-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics