Abstract
The introductory chapter outlines the scope and content of the book, which develops a new approach for the study of films adapted from canonical ‘originals’ such as Shakespeare’s plays. The book problematises field’s current broad consensus that adaptations are heightened examples of the premise that all texts are in dialogue with other texts, so that all artworks inform and are informed by other artworks. The book instead argues that film adaptations of canonical texts partake in and extend cinema’s inherent manipulation and concealment of its own artifice. These source texts, which may have subtle gradations of artifice and verisimilitude in their ‘original’ forms are, to a greater or lesser extent, adapted into film texts which foreground the constructed, re-performative nature of the adaptation in relation to the source—the film adaptation announces that it has an artifice derived from the author in a manner that is quite different from other (non-adapted) films. In order to analyse this process, the book moves from a dialogic to a psychoanalytic poststructuralist account of film adaptation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981 [1934–1941]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barthes, Roland. 1995 [1967]. “The Death of the Author.” In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Seán Burke, 125–30. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Benveniste, Émile. 1970. Problems in General Linguistics. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables: Miami University Press.
Heath, Stephen. 1981. Questions of Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
———. 1985. “‘Jaws’, Ideology and Film Theory.” In Movies and Methods Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 509–14. Berkeley: University of California Press.
MacCabe, Colin. 1985. Theoretical Essays; Film, Linguistics, Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Metz, Christian. 1985. “Story/Discourse: Notes on Two Kinds of Voyeurism.” In Movies and Methods Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 543–9. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geal, R. (2019). Introduction. In: Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16496-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16496-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16495-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16496-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)