Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture ((PSADVC))

  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

The introductory chapter outlines the scope and content of the book, which develops a new approach for the study of films adapted from canonical ‘originals’ such as Shakespeare’s plays. The book problematises field’s current broad consensus that adaptations are heightened examples of the premise that all texts are in dialogue with other texts, so that all artworks inform and are informed by other artworks. The book instead argues that film adaptations of canonical texts partake in and extend cinema’s inherent manipulation and concealment of its own artifice. These source texts, which may have subtle gradations of artifice and verisimilitude in their ‘original’ forms are, to a greater or lesser extent, adapted into film texts which foreground the constructed, re-performative nature of the adaptation in relation to the source—the film adaptation announces that it has an artifice derived from the author in a manner that is quite different from other (non-adapted) films. In order to analyse this process, the book moves from a dialogic to a psychoanalytic poststructuralist account of film adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981 [1934–1941]. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, Roland. 1995 [1967]. “The Death of the Author.” In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Seán Burke, 125–30. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, Émile. 1970. Problems in General Linguistics. Translated by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables: Miami University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Stephen. 1981. Questions of Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. “‘Jaws’, Ideology and Film Theory.” In Movies and Methods Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 509–14. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCabe, Colin. 1985. Theoretical Essays; Film, Linguistics, Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, Christian. 1985. “Story/Discourse: Notes on Two Kinds of Voyeurism.” In Movies and Methods Volume II, edited by Bill Nichols, 543–9. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Geal .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Geal, R. (2019). Introduction. In: Anamorphic Authorship in Canonical Film Adaptation. Palgrave Studies in Adaptation and Visual Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16496-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics