Advertisement

Agonistic Pluralism

Chapter
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

I argue that agonistic pluralism, though not without its faults, offers a unique and powerful, and as yet under-researched, platform through which to understand and explain much about the potential and existing democratic role of ethnic media. Its most intriguing insight, and the source of much of its controversy, stems from its search for a new way of balancing pluralism and consensus (Mouffe, 2000b). My primary engagement with Chantal Mouffe’s version of agonistic democracy, among a raft of overlapping yet differing choices, stems largely from her insistence on the necessity and inevitability of some form of shared grounding and boundaries, upon and within which democratic interactions can take place. That Mouffe wants these foundations consistently questioned, exposed and challenged, rather than abandoned altogether, differentiates her from more radical proponents of an agonism that refuse any form of collective governance or the formation, even temporarily, of shared rules and spaces for democratic dialogue (Wingenbach in Institutionalising agonistic democracy: Post foundationalism and political liberalism. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey). These latter approaches, I suggest, pay less attention to one of the fundamental aspects of Mouffe’s writing, and an aspect of central importance to (ethnic) media studies—the management of interaction in plural societies in a way that rejects political closure and yet acknowledges the importance of institutional support for agonism and difference.

Keywords

Mouffe Agonistic democracy Ethnic media Pluralism 

References

  1. Bayard, C., Isajiw, S., & Madison, G. (1996). On the itineraries of democracy: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Studies in Political Economy, 49, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cammaerts, B. (2009). Radical pluralism and free speech in online public spaces: The case of North Belgian extreme right discourses. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(6), 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cammaerts, B. (2015). Neoliberalism and the post-hegemonic war of position: The dialectic between invisibility and visibilities. European Journal of Communication, 30(5), 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connolly, W. (1995). The ethos of pluralization. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Couldry, N. (2000). The place of media power: Pilgrims and witnesses of the media age. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals: A critical approach. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Couldry, N., & Dreher, T. (2007). Globalization and the public sphere: The space of community media in Sydney. Global Media and Communication, 3(1), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlberg, L. (2011). Discourse theory as critical media politics? Five questions. In L. Dahlberg & S. Phelan (Eds.), Discourse theory and critical media politics (pp. 41–63). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlberg, L. (2014). The Habermasian public sphere and exclusion: An engagement with poststructural-influenced critics. Communication Theory, 24, 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlberg, L., & Phelan, S. (2011). Discourse theory and critical media politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dreher, T. (2009). Listening across difference: Media and multiculturalism beyond the politics of voice. Continuum, 23(4), 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fenton, N., & Titley, G. (2015). Mourning and longing: Media studies learning to let go of liberal democracy. European Journal of Communication, 30(5), 554–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public Sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glover, R. (2011). Radically rethinking citizenship: Disaggregation, agonistic pluralism and the politics of immigration in the United States. Political Studies, 59(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goi, S. (2005). Agonism, deliberation and the politics of abortion. Polity, 37(1), 54–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansen, A. D., & Sonnichsen, A. (2014). Radical democracy, agonism and the limits of pluralism: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(3), 263–270.Google Scholar
  19. Howarth, D. (2008). Ethos, agonism and populism: William Connolly and the case for radical democracy. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(2), 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Husband, C. (1998). Differentiated citizenship and the multi-ethnic public sphere. Journal of International Communication, 5(1–2), 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Husband, C. (2005). Minority ethnic media as communities of practice: Professionalism and identity politics in interaction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(3), 461–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jane, E. (2017). “Dude…stop the spread”: Antagonism, agonism, and #manspreading on social media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(5), 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, M. (2014). Chantal Mouffe’s agonistic project: Passions and participation. Parallax, 20(2), 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kapoor, I. (2002). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? The relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe debate for third world politics. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(4), 459–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karagiannis, N., & Wagner, P. (2008). Varieties of agonism: Conflict, the common good, and the need for synagonism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 39(3), 323–339.Google Scholar
  26. Karppinen, K. (2007). Against naïve pluralism in media politics: On the implications of the radical-pluralist approach to the public sphere. Media, Culture and Society, 29(3), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karppinen, K. (2013). Rethinking media pluralism. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katiambo, D. (2017). #Someonetellcnn: The agonistic relationship between south and north media memories. Journal of Media Critique, 3(10), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kosnick, K. (2007). Migrant media: Turkish broadcasting and multicultural politics in Berlin. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. MacGilchrist, F., & Bohmig, I. (2012). Blogs, genes and immigration: Online media and minimal politics. Media, Culture and Society, 34(1), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maeseele, P., & Raeijmaekers, D. (2017). Nothing on the news but the establishment blues? Toward a framework of depoliticisation and agonistic media pluralism. Journalism. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/.
  33. McCosker, A., & Johns, A. (2013). Productive provocations: Vitriolic media, spaces of protest and agonistic outrage in the 2011 England riots. The Fibreculture Journal, 22, 171–193.Google Scholar
  34. Morrison, A. (2018). Rescuing politics from liberalism: Buttler and Mouffe on affectivity and the place of ethics. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 44(5), 528–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.Google Scholar
  37. Mouffe, C. (2000a). The democratic paradox. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  38. Mouffe, C. (2000b). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Reihe Politikwissenschaft/Political Science Series 72. Vienna: Wien Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
  39. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Mouffe, C. (2012). An agonistic approach to the future of Europe. New Literary History, 43(4), 629–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  42. Phelan, S. (2014a). Critiquing “neoliberalism”: Three interrogations and a defence. In L. Lievrouw (Ed.), Challenging communication research (pp. 27–41). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  43. Phelan, S. (2014b). Media, neoliberalism and the political. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  44. Philips, A. (2009). Multiculturalism without culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, C. (1998). The dynamics of democratic exclusion. Journal of Democracy, 9(4), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenman, M. (2013). Agonistic democracy: Constituent power in the era of globalisation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wingenbach, E. (2011). Institutionalising agonistic democracy: Post foundationalism and political liberalism. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MediaUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations