Skip to main content

Religious Studies and September 11, 2001: Religion and Power in the Ruins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
9/11 and the Academy
  • 209 Accesses

Abstract

In Religious Studies, comprehending the events of September 11th, 2001 required an analysis of the intersections between religion, politics, and global socio-economic systems before and after the event. Though the event seemed to strike out of the blue like the planes themselves, examining the religiosity of the acts required deep contextualization in the concrete details and histories that brought the hijackers to that day, as well as an examination of the interpretive lenses that the discipline of Religious Studies employed. Starting in the early 1990s, seismic shifts in the field were articulated along methodological fault lines as Religious Studies scholars divided over their positions on the discipline’s historic and, to some, current involvement in the global histories of colonialism, imperialism, globalized capitalism and, more recently, neoliberalism. As for so many other fields, the suicide bombings and mass murders ignited a disciplinary crucible on the social location, commitments, and methodological approaches of the Religious Studies scholar. Within a few years after 9/11, sub-fields such as Islamic Studies and Violence Studies were developed, and a messy public battle broke out regarding role of the Religious Studies scholar in a world of conflicts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am indebted to the in-depth analysis of these early writers’ theories and autobiographies in Strenski (2006).

  2. 2.

    This was also the case for other religious traditions such as African Animisms, syncretic Caribbean religions, Indigenous American religions, and to a lesser extent, Asian religions. By 2001, the field began to diversity its objects of study and to show a dramatic shift in diversity of people doing the studying.

  3. 3.

    Many scholars have dropped the use of the term “terrorism” altogether because its deployment in the discursive and affective economies of American political power which often paints all non-state violence as illegitimate “terrorism,” and in which “terror” is automatically linked with “Islam.”

References

  • Ahmed, Sarah. 2004. Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albinus, Lars. 2006. Review of Russel T. McCutcheon’s The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (2): 524–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, Scott. 1999. The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, Reconciliation. Lexington: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, Dylan. 2014, October 10. A Taxonomy of the ‘Islam Debate.’ Politico, LLC. https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/10/a-taxonomy-of-the-islam-debate-196904. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.

  • Chidester, David. 2014. Empire of Religion: Imperialism and Comparative Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Harvey. 1965. The Secular City: A Celebration of Its Liberties and Invitation to Its Discipline. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, Mircea. 1987. The Sacred and the Profane. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1961. The Future of an Illusion. Translated by James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1999. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 1996. Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2001. Mark Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishi, Katayoun. 2017, November 15. Assaults Against Muslims in U.S. Surpass 2001 Level. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/15/assaults-against-muslims-in-u-s-surpass-2001-level/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.

  • Lincoln, Bruce. 2003. Holy Terrors: Thinking About Religion After September 11. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Gordon. 2012. The Sacred in the Modern World: A Cultural Sociological Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, Jane. 2012. How Did You End Up in Islamic Studies? In Christian Lives Given to the Study of Islam, ed. Christian W. Troll and C.T.R. Hewer, 219–228. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, Russell. 2003. The Discipline and Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, Russell. 2006. ‘It’s a Lie. There’s No Truth in It! It’s a Sin!’: On the Limits of the Humanistic Study of Religion and the Costs of Saving Others from Themselves. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (3): 720–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Brigit. 2014. Around Birgit Meyer’s ‘Mediation and the Genesis of Presence: Toward a Material Approach to Religion,’ Religion and Society: Advances in Research 5: 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Tim. 2006. Cultural Understandings of “Religion”: The Hermeneutical Context of Teaching Religious Studies in North America. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 18 (3): 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, Robert. 2004. Fair Game. Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion 33 (3–4): 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Tam K. 2011, September 8. 9/11 and the Question of Religion. Political Theology Network. https://politicaltheology.com/911-and-the-question-of-religion/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.

  • Power, Samantha. 2002. A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, Donovan O. 2015. Religious Affects: Animality, Evolution, and Power. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strenski, Ivan. 1993. Lessons for Religious Studies in Waco? Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61 (3): 567–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strenski, Ivan. 2006. Thinking About Religion: An Historical Introduction to Theories of Religion. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strenski, Ivan. 2010. Why Politics Can’t Be Freed from Religion, 11–32. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taves, Anne. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, Thomas. 2006. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tam K. Parker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parker, T.K. (2019). Religious Studies and September 11, 2001: Religion and Power in the Ruins. In: Finney, M., Shannon, M. (eds) 9/11 and the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16418-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16419-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics