Abstract
In Religious Studies, comprehending the events of September 11th, 2001 required an analysis of the intersections between religion, politics, and global socio-economic systems before and after the event. Though the event seemed to strike out of the blue like the planes themselves, examining the religiosity of the acts required deep contextualization in the concrete details and histories that brought the hijackers to that day, as well as an examination of the interpretive lenses that the discipline of Religious Studies employed. Starting in the early 1990s, seismic shifts in the field were articulated along methodological fault lines as Religious Studies scholars divided over their positions on the discipline’s historic and, to some, current involvement in the global histories of colonialism, imperialism, globalized capitalism and, more recently, neoliberalism. As for so many other fields, the suicide bombings and mass murders ignited a disciplinary crucible on the social location, commitments, and methodological approaches of the Religious Studies scholar. Within a few years after 9/11, sub-fields such as Islamic Studies and Violence Studies were developed, and a messy public battle broke out regarding role of the Religious Studies scholar in a world of conflicts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I am indebted to the in-depth analysis of these early writers’ theories and autobiographies in Strenski (2006).
- 2.
This was also the case for other religious traditions such as African Animisms, syncretic Caribbean religions, Indigenous American religions, and to a lesser extent, Asian religions. By 2001, the field began to diversity its objects of study and to show a dramatic shift in diversity of people doing the studying.
- 3.
Many scholars have dropped the use of the term “terrorism” altogether because its deployment in the discursive and affective economies of American political power which often paints all non-state violence as illegitimate “terrorism,” and in which “terror” is automatically linked with “Islam.”
References
Ahmed, Sarah. 2004. Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge Press.
Albinus, Lars. 2006. Review of Russel T. McCutcheon’s The Discipline of Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (2): 524–528.
Appleby, Scott. 1999. The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, Reconciliation. Lexington: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Byers, Dylan. 2014, October 10. A Taxonomy of the ‘Islam Debate.’ Politico, LLC. https://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2014/10/a-taxonomy-of-the-islam-debate-196904. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
Chidester, David. 2014. Empire of Religion: Imperialism and Comparative Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cox, Harvey. 1965. The Secular City: A Celebration of Its Liberties and Invitation to Its Discipline. London: MacMillan.
Eliade, Mircea. 1987. The Sacred and the Profane. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Freud, Sigmund. 1961. The Future of an Illusion. Translated by James Strachey. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Fitzgerald, Timothy. 1999. The Ideology of Religious Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2001. Mark Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Kishi, Katayoun. 2017, November 15. Assaults Against Muslims in U.S. Surpass 2001 Level. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/11/15/assaults-against-muslims-in-u-s-surpass-2001-level/. Accessed 28 Jan 2019.
Lincoln, Bruce. 2003. Holy Terrors: Thinking About Religion After September 11. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lynch, Gordon. 2012. The Sacred in the Modern World: A Cultural Sociological Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McAuliffe, Jane. 2012. How Did You End Up in Islamic Studies? In Christian Lives Given to the Study of Islam, ed. Christian W. Troll and C.T.R. Hewer, 219–228. New York: Fordham University Press.
McCutcheon, Russell. 2003. The Discipline and Religion: Structure, Meaning, Rhetoric. London: Routledge.
McCutcheon, Russell. 2006. ‘It’s a Lie. There’s No Truth in It! It’s a Sin!’: On the Limits of the Humanistic Study of Religion and the Costs of Saving Others from Themselves. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 74 (3): 720–750.
Meyer, Brigit. 2014. Around Birgit Meyer’s ‘Mediation and the Genesis of Presence: Toward a Material Approach to Religion,’ Religion and Society: Advances in Research 5: 209.
Murphy, Tim. 2006. Cultural Understandings of “Religion”: The Hermeneutical Context of Teaching Religious Studies in North America. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 18 (3): 197–218.
Orsi, Robert. 2004. Fair Game. Bulletin of the Council of Societies for the Study of Religion 33 (3–4): 87–89.
Parker, Tam K. 2011, September 8. 9/11 and the Question of Religion. Political Theology Network. https://politicaltheology.com/911-and-the-question-of-religion/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
Power, Samantha. 2002. A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Basic Books.
Schaefer, Donovan O. 2015. Religious Affects: Animality, Evolution, and Power. Durham: Duke University Press.
Strenski, Ivan. 1993. Lessons for Religious Studies in Waco? Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61 (3): 567–574.
Strenski, Ivan. 2006. Thinking About Religion: An Historical Introduction to Theories of Religion. Malden: Blackwell.
Strenski, Ivan. 2010. Why Politics Can’t Be Freed from Religion, 11–32. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Taves, Anne. 2009. Religious Experience Reconsidered: A Building Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tweed, Thomas. 2006. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parker, T.K. (2019). Religious Studies and September 11, 2001: Religion and Power in the Ruins. In: Finney, M., Shannon, M. (eds) 9/11 and the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16418-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16419-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)