Skip to main content

Changed Worlds? American Studies, Trauma Studies, and September 11, 2001

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
9/11 and the Academy
  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter confronts the notion of a post-September 11, 2001 “changed world” according to theoretical and methodological trajectories within both American Studies and Trauma Studies. First, I delineate these trajectories’ primary concerns with politics and representation at the time of the September 11 attacks as the conventional frameworks within which knowledge of that day and its aftermath came to be understood in the ensuing decade. I then use a popular culture approach common to these frameworks, but branch away from Freudian-based views of traumatization as an individualized experience with pathological connotations to attend to cultural trauma as an intersubjective phenomenon rooted manifestly in historical causation. Drawing on psychologist Ronnie Janoff-Bulman’s cognitive model of psychological trauma, I define cultural trauma as a radical disruption of fundamental, culturally-generated and structured beliefs about what comprises a community’s shared worldview. In doing so, I focus on how the horrifying and widely-witnessed hijackings shattered assumptions crucial to mainstream American understandings of daily life by confounding the dominant values of optimism, self-determination, and faith in a just world. Viewing culture as a site for struggles of power, I argue that popular culture in the twenty-first century’s first decade—specifically, film and television—narratively engages with the vulnerability showcased by that day’s public deaths, primarily through a preoccupation with no-win scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Americanists draw on cultural studies, history, literature, media studies, philosophy, psychology, sociology…in effect, any discipline whose theoretical investments and methodological approaches can support fruitful inquiry about American culture. Terming the field an “interdiscipline” most efficiently foregrounds the interdisciplinarity at the heart of the practice of American Studies.

  2. 2.

    The title of David W. Noble’s (2002) book, Death of a Nation: American Culture and the End of Exceptionalism, indicates confidence about this ideology’s demise.

  3. 3.

    Shelley Fisher Fishkin (2005, 21), and Pease (2006, 74) make this same argument.

  4. 4.

    Fishkin argues that “criticizing your country when you know it to be wrong is as American as Mark Twain” (2005, 19).

  5. 5.

    The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) associates a number of “trauma- and stressor-related disorders” with the aftermath of a traumatic event (2013, 265).

  6. 6.

    The DSM-5 elaborates what such encounters and resulting disorders might include (2013, 265–290), with “exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence” among the criteria for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (271).

  7. 7.

    I include literature within the category of popular culture in the sense that the fiction I address here is readily-available to any interested reader, rather than accessible only to an elite or specially-trained few (apart from those with literacy skills).

  8. 8.

    See Tom Junod (2003) for a reflection on the cultural implications of witnessing those falling from the twin towers.

References

  • Ahmad, Muneer. 2002. Homeland Insecurities: Racial Violence the Day After September 11. Social Text 20 (3, Fall): 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC and London: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhofer, Robert F. Jr. 1979. The Americanness of American Studies. American Quarterly 31 (3): 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, Michael. 2003. American Studies Without Exceptions. PMLA 118 (1, Jan): 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Lucy. 2011. Compromised Critique: A Meta-critical Analysis of American Studies After 9/11. Journal of American Studies 45 (4): 733–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crownshaw, Richard. 2011. Deterritorializing the ‘Homeland’ in American Studies and American Fiction After 9/11. Journal of American Studies 45 (4): 757–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLillo, Don. 2007. Falling Man. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, Michael. 1986. ‘The Special American Conditions’: Marxism and American Studies. American Quarterly 38 (3): 356–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, Jane C., and Virginia R. Domínguez. 1996. Resituating American Studies in a Critical Internationalism. American Quarterly 48 (3, Sept): 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadda-Conrey, Carol. 2011. Arab American Citizenship in Crisis: Destabilizing Representations of Arabs and Muslims in the US after 9/11. Modern Fiction Studies 57 (3, Fall): 532–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, Shelley Fisher. 2005. ‘Crossroads of Cultures: The Transnational Turn in American Studies’: Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, November 12, 2004. American Quarterly 57 (1, March): 17–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon and trans. Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, and Kate Soper. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, Paul. 1994. Reconstructing American Studies: Transnational Paradoxes, Comparative Perspectives. Journal of American Studies 28 (3): 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Robert A. 2000. The Transnational Turn: Rediscovering American Studies in a Wider World. Journal of American Studies 34 (3): 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Judith. 1997 [1992]. Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickstadt, Heinz. 2002. American Studies in an Age of Globalization. American Quarterly 54 (4, Dec): 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie. 1992. Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junod, Tom. 2003. The Falling Man. Esquire (Sept): 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammen, Michael. 1993. The Problem of American Exceptionalism: A Reconsideration. American Quarterly 45 (1, March): 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Amy. 2004. Violent Belongings and the Question of Empire Today: Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, October 17, 2003. American Quarterly 56 (1, March): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Amy, and Donald E. Pease (eds.). 1993. Cultures of United States Imperialism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, Linda K. 1989. Diversity and the Transformation of American Studies. American Quarterly 41 (3, Sept): 415–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler-Harris, Alice. 1992. Cultural Locations: Positioning American Studies in the Great Debate. American Quarterly 44 (3, Sept): 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, George. 1990. Listening to Learn and Learning to Listen: Popular Culture, Cultural Theory, and American Studies. American Quarterly 42 (4, Dec): 615–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, George. 1995. The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: Racialized Social Democracy and the ‘White’ Problem in American Studies. American Quarterly 47 (3, Sept): 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, George. 1998. ‘Sent for You Yesterday, Here You Come Today’: American Studies Scholarship and the New Social Movements. Cultural Critique 40 (Autumn): 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Elaine Tyler. 1996. ‘The Radical Roots of American Studies’: Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, November 9, 1995. American Quarterly 48 (2, June): 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, Melani. 2002. A Cultural History of the War Without End. The Journal of American History 89 (2, Sept): 439–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, Christine. 2017. September 11, 2001 as a Cultural Trauma: A Case Study Through Popular Culture. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, David W. 2002. Death of a Nation: American Culture and the End of Exceptionalism. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Joseph. 2008. Netherland. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pease, Donald E. 2000. C.L.R. James, Moby-Dick, and the Emergence of Transnational American Studies. Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory 56 (3, Autumn): 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, Donald E. 2006. 9/11: When Was ‘American Studies After the New Americanists’? Boundary 2 33 (3): 73–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pease, Donald E. 2009. Re-thinking ‘American Studies after US Exceptionalism’. American Literary History 21 (1, Spring): 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radway, Janice. 1999. What’s In a Name? Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, 20 November, 1998. American Quarterly 51 (1, March): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, John Carlos. 1998. Post-nationalism, Globalism, and the New American Studies. Cultural Critique 40 (Autumn): 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, John Carlos. 2002. The New American Studies. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, John Carlos. 2004. Edward Said and American Studies. American Quarterly 56 (1, March): 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, George. 2002. ‘Working at the Crossroads: American Studies for the 21st Century’: Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, November 9, 2001. American Quarterly 54 (1, March): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sielke, Sabine. 2010. Why ‘9/11 is [not] Unique’, or: Troping Trauma. Amerikastudien/American Studies 55 (3): 385–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star Trek. 2009. Dir. and Prod. J.J. Abrams. Paramount Pictures. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suskind, Ron. 2004. Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush. The New York Times Magazine, 17 Oct. Web. 12 Feb 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/faith-certainty-and-the-presidency-of-george-w-bush.html.

  • Thomson, Rosemarie Garland. 1996. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, Priscilla. 1998. Minefields and Meeting Grounds: Transnational Analyses and American Studies. American Literary History 10 (1, Spring): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Jess. 2006. The Zero. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, Mary Helen. 1998. ‘Disturbing the Peace: What Happens to American Studies if You Put African American Studies at the Center?’ Presidential Address to the American Studies Association, October 29, 1997. American Quarterly 50 (1, March): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Muller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Muller, C. (2019). Changed Worlds? American Studies, Trauma Studies, and September 11, 2001. In: Finney, M., Shannon, M. (eds) 9/11 and the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16419-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16418-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16419-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics