Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Complexity ((BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY))

  • 294 Accesses

Abstract

The act of sharing information online depends on the actor’s ability to share—that is, having access to social media platforms, being willing to use social media, and being familiar with relevant technology. Several social media affordances also play a role in whether people share online content. These affordances are both sociotechnical (i.e., the way people interact with technology) and practical (i.e., capabilities of specific platforms that allow users to create content, build networks, and share information).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazarova, N., Choi, Y., Sosik, V., Cosley, D., & Whitlock, J. (2015). Social sharing of emotions on Facebook: Channel differences, satisfaction, and replies. In ACM Conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 154–164). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debatin, B. (2008). The internet as a new platform for expressing opinions and as a new public sphere. In W. Donsbach & M. W. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 64–72). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gayo-Avello, D. (2011). Don’t turn social media into another ‘Literary Digest’ poll. Communications of the ACM, 54, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). Ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haralabopoulos, G., Anagnostopoulos, I., & Zeadally, S. (2015). Lifespan and propagation of information in On-line Social Networks: A case study based on Reddit. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 56, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Ma, L. (2012). News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. (2012). Virality in social media: The SPIN framework. Journal of Public Affairs, 12, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syn, S., & Oh, S. (2015). Why do social network site users share information on Facebook and Twitter? Journal of Information Science, 41, 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515585717

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paletz, S.B.F., Auxier, B.E., Golonka, E.M. (2019). Ability to Share. In: A Multidisciplinary Framework of Information Propagation Online. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16413-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16413-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16412-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16413-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics