Skip to main content

The First Survey on the “Governance” of Foundations: The Original Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance and Strategic Philanthropy in Grant-Making Foundations

Abstract

The role of governance is fundamental to align the strategy and the operations of Foundations with the requirements of an “effective” management of social interventions. Specific features that qualify the governance of Foundations are concerned with:

  • the structure of the governing bodies and functions of the Foundations;

  • the attributes that can make the Board of Directors more effective;

  • the applications of these attributes to Non-Profit organisations.

The governance of a Foundation may envision one or more of the following executive bodies:

  • The Members’ Meeting;

  • The Steering Body or Steering Committee;

  • The Administrative Body or Board;

  • The Chairperson;

  • The Deputy-Chairpersons;

  • The committees supporting the Administrative Body (executive, scientific, technical, etc.);

  • The Director or Secretary General;

  • The Accounting Control Body;

  • The Board of Arbitrators.

To act as “social drivers”, Foundations need an appropriate organisation of their executive processes, in order to guarantee the correct discussion and formalisation:

  • of their institutional objectives;

  • of the human and instrumental resources necessary to achieve them;

  • of the processes to be implemented in the operating phase;

  • of the planning and control tools through which to supervise the operating phase.

This chapter summarises the desirable “phases” in the development of the governance model of a proactive Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An Italian original version of this chapter has been published in “Managerialità Solidale. Governance e strategia nelle fondazioni” by Giacomo Boesso and Fabrizio Cerbioni (Chap. 2), © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Italia s.r.l. Translation and republishing rights were granted to authors.

  2. 2.

    Just think of the intense philanthropic activity of American giants such as the aforementioned Bill & Linda Gates Foundation and Packard Foundation that issue millions of grants each year. Just the first five US foundations in 2011 showed a book value of USD 70 billion, higher, therefore, than that of the 88 Italian Foundations of Banking Origin (http://foundationcenter.org/findfunders/topfunders/top100assets.html).

  3. 3.

    Since the Middle Ages, public power strongly entered the life and administration of many private assistance organisations: under the pretext of improving their actions, it took advantage of them to benefit members of the ruling class, appointing them with management tasks, which procured prestige and social standing (Silvano 2001, p. 25).

  4. 4.

    We can mention, among other elements: the deductibility of donations given to the foundations; the VAT exemption on services and products; the non-taxation of operating surpluses; the exemption from local property taxes (now IMU); the possibility of making certain operating income non-taxable, the five and eight per thousand and so on.

  5. 5.

    Already a law from 1862 considered all foundations and institutions dedicated to social help, education and assistance as Non-Profit entities. That law also envisioned the possibility of reforming the articles of incorporation, although with the utmost respect for the will of the founder, when the mission of such an organisation would no longer be applicable. It also envisioned the termination of Management Body in case of inefficient results. The appointment of the Chairperson and the members of the Board was entrusted to the City Council. G. Silvano (2001, p. 45 et seq). In this regard, the “Foundations Charter” of 2011 states that “The necessary governing bodies of foundations are, in addition to the Chairperson, the Steering Committee, the Administration Body and the Control Body … for foundations with multiple members (Associations) the Members’ Meeting … represents an irreplaceable subject also to ensure an adequate presence of representatives of civil society in a steering capacity”.

  6. 6.

    For all other Granting Foundations, the existing rules are a “diluted” and “simplified” solution with respect to bank Foundations, with a governance model that only envisions a Board of Directors, its Chairperson and a General Manager.

  7. 7.

    According to the Foundations Charter, the Board of Directors is the proposing and managing body, responsible for implementing the programmes defined by the Steering Body and for pursuing the objectives identified.

  8. 8.

    Defined by the Amato Law of 1990 and subsequent legislative and jurisprudential interventions of interest for the Foundations of banking origin. A complete and always updated list can be found on the website of the trade association: www.acri.it in the regulations section.

  9. 9.

    www.acri.it, www.assifero.org, www.istat.it/it/censimento-industria-e-servizi, www.efc.be.

  10. 10.

    Governance is, of course, more managerial in Foundations that have a reasonable ability to plan their revenues (such as those of banking origin) and can draw up multi-year plans with resources committed from year to year.

  11. 11.

    The term is inspired by the German federal constitution, which foresees the impossibility for parliament to issue a no-confidence vote on the government without simultaneously granting the confidence to a new executive body (Fundamental law of 1949, art. 67). The term, in the managerial context, has assumed relevance if, at the discussion and opposition phase with respect to the approval of certain projects, there is a possible solution or alternative to the reported critical factor.

References

  • Barbetta, G. P. (2001). Le fondazioni di origine bancaria: Merchant banker del settore nonprofit italiano? [Foundations of banking origin: Merchant bankers in the Italian non-profit sector?]. Non-Profit, 7(2), 211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesso, G., & Cerbioni, F. (2013). La Governance delle Fondazioni: leader al servizio della filantropia [The governance of foundations: Leaders at the service of philanthropy]. Milan: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P., Hayday, B., & Armstrong, R. (2007). Non-profit governance models: Problems and prospects. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(3), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEP, Center for Effective Philanthropy. (2004). Foundation governance: The CEO viewpoint. Report on-line http://www.effectivephilanthropy.org/.

  • Conger, J., Finegold, D., & Lawler, E. E., III. (1998). Appraising boardroom performance. Harvard Business Review, 76, 136–148. Muth, M. and L., Donaldson, 1998, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, C., & Edwards, C. (1999). Board roles in the strategic management of non-profit organisations: Theory and practice. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 346–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. L. (2002). The board as a monitor of organisational activity. The applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12, 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monge, F. (2009). La governance delle Fondazioni bancarie [The governance of bank foundations]. Milan: Competitors & Competition, Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, G. T., Benson, G. S., & Finegold, D. L. (2009). Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 704–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, L. (1995). Pathways to leadership: How to achieve and sustain success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvano G. (2001). Origini e Sviluppi del Terzo Settore Italiano [Origins and developments of the Italian non-profit sector]. In Società e Terzo Settore la via Italiana [Society and non-profit sector, the Italian way] (p. 25). Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieghi, M. (2002). Le fondazioni bancarie. Riforma o controriforma? [Bank foundations. Reform or counter-reform?]. Milan: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Boesso .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boesso, G., Cerbioni, F. (2019). The First Survey on the “Governance” of Foundations: The Original Model. In: Governance and Strategic Philanthropy in Grant-Making Foundations. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16357-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics