Skip to main content

Psychosocial Approaches in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Treating Opioid Addiction

Abstract

Treatment admissions for opioid use disorder (OUD) have risen dramatically in the United States, as population exposure to potent opioids, both prescribed and illicit, has increased substantially. Psychosocial approaches are empirically supported and cost-effective interventions in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUD), including alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine use disorders. While many practice guidelines recommend psychosocial approaches in comprehensive treatment protocols for individuals with OUD, key questions exist regarding their nature, scope, and impact in addressing OUD specifically. Given the consensus view that medications such as methadone, buprenorphine/naloxone, and extended-release naltrexone are first-line treatments to decrease opioid use and reduce overdose risk, the utility of psychosocial approaches for individuals with OUD has come under scrutiny. This chapter provides an overview of the application of, and evidence for, psychosocial approaches as independent interventions and as adjuncts to pharmacotherapies in the treatment of OUD. This review further outlines a research agenda to address important but unanswered clinical questions and provides clinical recommendations based on the existing evidence. Given that these recommendations are based on limited OUD-specific empirical support, however, there is a critical need to develop, test, and disseminate psychosocial approaches that can (1) help build on the benefits provided by pharmacotherapies and (2) operate as stand-alone interventions for individuals who prefer not to take OUD medication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AA:

Alcoholics Anonymous

ACT:

Acceptance and commitment therapy

AUD:

Alcohol use disorder

BI:

Brief intervention

CBT:

Cognitive-behavioral therapies

CM:

Contingency management

DSM:

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

IOPs:

Intensive outpatient programs

MASH:

Massachusetts Association of Sober Housing

MHOs:

Mutual-help organizations

MI:

Motivational interviewing

MM:

Medication management

NA:

Narcotics Anonymous

NARR:

National Association for Recovery Residences

OUD:

Opioid use disorder

PHPs:

Partial hospital programs

RCTs:

Randomized controlled trials

SAMHSA:

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

SBIRT:

Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment

SUD:

Substance use disorder

TAU:

Treatment as usual

TES:

Therapeutic Education System

TSF:

Twelve (12)-step facilitation

References

  1. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (U.S.). Treatment episode data set (TEDS) 2005–2015: state admissions to substance abuse treatment services. Rockville: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2017. xvi, 214 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marsden J, Stillwell G, Jones H, Cooper A, Eastwood B, Farrell M, et al. Does exposure to opioid substitution treatment in prison reduce the risk of death after release? A national prospective observational study in England. Addiction. 2017;112(8):1408–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, Davoli M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(2):CD002207.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, Indave BI, Degenhardt L, Wiessing L, et al. Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ. 2017;357:j1550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kampman K, Jarvis M. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice guideline for the use of medications in the treatment of addiction involving opioid use. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):358–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuckit MA. Treatment of opioid-use disorders. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):357–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wakeman SE, Barnett ML. Primary care and the opioid-overdose crisis – Buprenorphine myths and realities. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(1):1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saloner B, Stoller KB, Alexander GC. Moving addiction care to the mainstream – improving the quality of buprenorphine treatment. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(1):4–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. American Society of Addiction Medicine. National practice guideline for the use of medications in the treatment of addiction involving opioid use. Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine, Inc.; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kleber HD, Weiss RD, Anton RF Jr, George TP, Greenfield SF, Kosten TR, et al. Treatment of patients with substance use disorders, second edition. American Psychiatric Association. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(4 Suppl):5–123.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Federal guidelines for opioid treatment programs. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Clinical guidelines for the use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid addiction. In: DHHS, editor. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) series 40. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Medication-assisted treatment for opioid addiction in opioid treatment programs. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) series 43. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Defense. VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for the management of substance use disorders. In: Administration VsH, editor. National guideline clearinghouse. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cloud W, Granfield R. Conceptualizing recovery capital: expansion of a theoretical construct. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(12–13):1971–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Safren SA, Bedoya CA, O’Cleirigh C, Biello KB, Pinkston MM, Stein MD, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for adherence and depression in patients with HIV: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(11):e529–e38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelly JF. The National Recovery Study. Unpublished raw data. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Uebelacker LA, Bailey G, Herman D, Anderson B, Stein M. Patients’ beliefs about medications are associated with stated preference for methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone, or no medication-assisted therapy following inpatient opioid detoxification. J Subst Abus Treat. 2016;66:48–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Institute of Medicine. Psychosocial interventions for mental and substance use disorders: a framework for establishing evidence-based standards. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D’Onofrio G, O’Connor PG, Pantalon MV, Chawarski MC, Busch SH, Owens PH, et al. Emergency department-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1636–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (U.S.). Medications for opioid use disorder. Rockville: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 2018. 322 p.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roman PM, Johnson JA. National treatment center study report: public treatment centers. Athens: Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Roman PM, Johnson JA. National Treatment Center Study Summary Report: private treatment centers. Athens: Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. White WL. Slaying the dragon: the history of addiction treatment and recovery in America. 2nd ed. Bloomington: Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Betty Ford Institute Consensus P. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Subst Abus Treat. 2007;33(3):221–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hazelden Betty Ford Foundation. Opioid and heroin addiction treatment [Internet]. Center City: Hazelden Publishing; 2018.. [cited 2018 November 12]. Available from: https://www.hazeldenbettyford.org/treatment/models/specialized-programs/heroin-opioid-addiction-treatment.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lo Sasso AT, Byro E, Jason LA, Ferrari JR, Olson B. Benefits and costs associated with mutual-help community-based recovery homes: the Oxford House model. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35(1):47–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jason LA, Ferrari JR. Oxford house recovery homes: characteristics and effectiveness. Psychol Serv. 2010;7(2):92–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. White WL. Sponsor, recovery coach, addiction counselor: the importance of role clarity and role integrity. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. White WL, Evans AC. The recovery agenda: the shared role of peers and professionals. Public Health Rev. 2014;35(2).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chandler RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow ND. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA. 2009;301(2):183–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bronson J, Stroop J, Zimmer S, Berzofsky M. United States Bureau of Justice Statistics. Drug use, dependence, and abuse among state prisoners and jail inmates, 2007–2009. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2017. 27 p.

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Commission on Correctional Health Care, National Sheriffs’ Association. Jail-based medication-assisted treatment: promising practices, guidelines, and resources for the field. 2018. Retrieived from: https://www.ncchc.org/filebin/Resources/Jail-Based-MAT-PPG-web.pdf.

  34. United States Department of Justice, Lelling AE. Investigation of the Massachusetts Department of Correction Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act 2018 March 16. Available from: http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2018/03/20180322172953624.pdf.

  35. Freyer FJ. US investigating treatment of addicted prisoners in Mass. Boston, MA. 28 Mar 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nunn A, Zaller N, Dickman S, Trimbur C, Nijhawan A, Rich JD. Methadone and buprenorphine prescribing and referral practices in US prison systems: results from a nationwide survey. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;105(1–2):83–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Mumola CJ, Karberg JC, United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Drug use and dependence, state and federal prisoners, 2004. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2006. 11 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. At Rikers Island, a legacy of medication-assisted opioid treatment [Internet]. Stateline, an initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts. 2016 [cited 2018, November 21]. Available from: https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2016/05/23/at-rikers-island-a-legacy-of-medication-assisted-opioid-treatment.

  39. Aoun E, Renner J, Drexler K, on behalf of the APA Council on Addiction Psychiatry, Hoge SK, on behalf of the APA Council on Psychiatry and Law. Position statement on treatment of substance use disorders in the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: APA Official Actions. American Psychiatric Association; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee JD, Friedmann PD, Kinlock TW, Nunes EV, Boney TY, Hoskinson RA Jr, et al. Extended-release naltrexone to prevent opioid relapse in criminal justice offenders. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(13):1232–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Beck AT, Wright FD, Newman CF, Liese BS. Cognitive therapy of substance abuse. New York: The Guilford Press; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sisson RW, Azrin NH. The community reinforcement approach. In: Hester RK, Miller WR, Hester RK, Miller WR, editors. Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: effective alternatives. Pergamon general psychology series, vol. 157. Elmsford: Pergamon Press; 1989. p. 242–58.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Marlatt GA, Gordon JR, editors. Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford Press; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Larimer ME, Palmer RS, Marlatt GA. Relapse prevention. An overview of Marlatt’s cognitive-behavioral model. Alcohol Res Health. 1999;23(2):151–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bowen S, Witkiewitz K, Clifasefi SL, Grow J, Chawla N, Hsu SH, et al. Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatment as usual for substance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 2014;71(5):547–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Witkiewitz K, Bowen S, Douglas H, Hsu SH. Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance craving. Addict Behav. 2013;38(2):1563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. de Wit H. Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes. Addict Biol. 2009;14(1):22–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Azrin NH. Improvements in the community-reinforcement approach to alcoholism. Behav Res Ther. 1976;14(5):339–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Godley MD, Passetti LL, Subramaniam GA, Funk RR, Smith JE, Meyers RJ. Adolescent community reinforcement approach implementation and treatment outcomes for youth with opioid problem use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;174:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Luoma JB, Kohlenberg BS, Hayes SC, Fletcher L. Slow and steady wins the race: a randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy targeting shame in substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(1):43–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee EB, An W, Levin ME, Twohig MP. An initial meta-analysis of acceptance and commitment therapy for treating substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;155:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Onken LS, Shoham V. Technology and the stage model of behavioral intervention development. In: Marsch LA, Lord SE, Dallery J, editors. Behavioral healthcare and technology : using science-based innovations to transform practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Bickel WK, Marsch LA, Buchhalter AR, Badger GJ. Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: a randomized controlled trial. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;16(2):132–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. FDA permits marketing of mobile medical application for substance use disorder [press release]. Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 14 Sept 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Marsch LA, Guarino H, Acosta M, Aponte-Melendez Y, Cleland C, Grabinski M, et al. Web-based behavioral treatment for substance use disorders as a partial replacement of standard methadone maintenance treatment. J Subst Abus Treat. 2014;46(1):43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Campbell AN, Nunes EV, Matthews AG, Stitzer M, Miele GM, Polsky D, et al. Internet-delivered treatment for substance abuse: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(6):683–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Marsch LA, Guarino H, Grabinski MJ, Syckes C, Dillingham ET, Xie H, et al. Comparative effectiveness of web-based vs. educator-delivered HIV prevention for adolescent substance users: a randomized, controlled trial. J Subst Abus Treat. 2015;59:30–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Weiss RD, Potter JS, Fiellin DA, Byrne M, Connery HS, Dickinson W, et al. Adjunctive counseling during brief and extended buprenorphine-naloxone treatment for prescription opioid dependence: a 2-phase randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(12):1238–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Ling W, Hillhouse M, Ang A, Jenkins J, Fahey J. Comparison of behavioral treatment conditions in buprenorphine maintenance. Addiction. 2013;108(10):1788–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Moore BA, Fiellin DA, Cutter CJ, Buono FD, Barry DT, Fiellin LE, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy improves treatment outcomes for prescription opioid users in primary care buprenorphine treatment. J Subst Abus Treat. 2016;71:54–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dennis M, Godley SH, Diamond G, Tims FM, Babor T, Donaldson J, et al. The Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) study: main findings from two randomized trials. J Subst Abus Treat. 2004;27(3):197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Woody GE, Poole SA, Subramaniam G, Dugosh K, Bogenschutz M, Abbott P, et al. Extended vs short-term buprenorphine-naloxone for treatment of opioid-addicted youth: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;300(17):2003–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Humphreys K, Moos RH. Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(1):64–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nowinski J, Baker S, Carroll K. Twelve step facilitation therapy manual: a clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. Rockville: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ries RK, Galanter M, Tonigan JS. Twelve-step facilitation. In: Galanter M, Kleber HD, editors. The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of substance abuse treatment. 4th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2008. p. 373–86.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Oxford House Inc. Annual Report Fiscal Year 2017. Silver Spring; 30 Jan 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH three-year drinking outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22(6):1300–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: treatment main effects and matching effects on drinking during treatment. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59:631–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kaskutas LA, Subbaraman MS, Witbrodt J, Zemore SE. Effectiveness of making alcoholics anonymous easier: a group format 12-step facilitation approach. J Subst Abus Treat. 2009;37:228–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Tennen H, Kabela-Cormier E. Network Support II: randomized controlled trial of network support treatment and cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;165:203–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Walitzer KS, Dermen KH, Barrick C. Facilitating involvement in alcoholics anonymous during out-patient treatment: a randomized clinical trial. Addiction. 2009;104(3):391–401.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Kelly JF, Kaminer Y, Kahler CW, Hoeppner B, Yeterian J, Cristello JV, et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial testing integrated 12-Step facilitation (iTSF) treatment for adolescent substance use disorder. Addiction. 2017;112(12):2155–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Crits-Christoph P, Siqueland L, Blaine J, Frank A, Luborsky L, Onken LS, et al. Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National Institute on Drug Abuse Collaborative Cocaine Treatment Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(6):493–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Donovan DM, Daley DC, Brigham GS, Hodgkins CC, Perl HI, Garrett SB, et al. Stimulant abuser groups to engage in 12-step: a multisite trial in the National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network. J Subst Abus Treat. 2013;44(1):103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Monico LB, Gryczynski J, Mitchell SG, Schwartz RP, O’Grady KE, Jaffe JH. Buprenorphine treatment and 12-step meeting attendance: conflicts, compatibilities, and patient outcomes. J Subst Abus Treat. 2015;57:89–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gossop M, Trakada K, Stewart D, Witton J. Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(3):295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Narcotics Anonymous World Services. Narcotics Anonymous and persons receiving medication-assisted treatment [Internet]. Narcotics Anonymous World Services; 2016 [cited 2018 October 23]. Available from: https://www.na.org/admin/include/spaw2/uploads/pdf/pr/2306_NA_PRMAT_1021.pdf.

  79. Kelly JF, Magill M, Stout RL. How do people recover from alcohol dependence? A systematic review of the research on mechanisms of behavior change in Alcoholics Anonymous. Addict Res Theory. 2009;17(3):236–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Kelly JF. Is Alcoholics Anonymous religious, spiritual, neither? Findings from 25 years of mechanisms of behavior change research. Addiction. 2017;112(6):929–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Jason LA, Davis MI, Ferrari JR. The need for substance abuse after-care: longitudinal analysis of Oxford House. Addict Behav. 2007;32(4):803–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Jason LA, Olson BD, Ferrari JR, Majer JM, Alvarez J, Stout J. An examination of main and interactive effects of substance abuse recovery housing on multiple indicators of adjustment. Addiction. 2007;102(7):1114–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. Am J Addict. 2004;13(2):103–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Miller WR, Zweben A, DiClemente CC, Rychtarik RG. Motivational enhancement therapy manual: a clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. NIAAA Project MATCH monograph, vol. 2, DHHS publication no. (ADM) 92–1894. Washington: Government Printing Office; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Miller WR, Sanchez VC. Motivating young adults for treatment and lifestyle change. In: Howard GL, editor. Issues in alcohol use and misuse by young adults. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press; 1993. p. 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Barry KL, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (U.S.). Brief interventions and brief therapies for substance abuse. Rockville (Rockwall II, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville 20857): U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; 1999. xxvi, 234 p.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dugosh K, Abraham A, Seymour B, McLoyd K, Chalk M, Festinger D. A systematic review on the use of psychosocial interventions in conjunction with medications for the treatment of opioid addiction. J Addict Med. 2016;10(2):93–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Saunders B, Wilkinson C, Phillips M. The impact of a brief motivational intervention with opiate users attending a methadone programme. Addiction. 1995;90(3):415–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Zahradnik A, Otto C, Crackau B, Lohrmann I, Bischof G, John U, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for problematic prescription drug use in non-treatment-seeking patients. Addiction. 2009;104(1):109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Otto C, Crackau B, Lohrmann I, Zahradnik A, Bischof G, John U, et al. Brief intervention in general hospital for problematic prescription drug use: 12-month outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;105(3):221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Bohnert AS, Bonar EE, Cunningham R, Greenwald MK, Thomas L, Chermack S, et al. A pilot randomized clinical trial of an intervention to reduce overdose risk behaviors among emergency department patients at risk for prescription opioid overdose. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;163:40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor T, Souza-Formigoni ML, de Lacerda RB, Ling W, et al. A randomized controlled trial of a brief intervention for illicit drugs linked to the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in clients recruited from primary health-care settings in four countries. Addiction. 2012;107(5):957–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Foxcroft DR, Coombes L, Wood S, Allen D, Almeida Santimano NM, Moreira MT. Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(7):CD007025.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Smedslund G, Berg RC, Hammerstrom KT, Steiro A, Leiknes KA, Dahl HM, et al. Motivational interviewing for substance abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(5):CD008063.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Bernstein J, Bernstein E, Tassiopoulos K, Heeren T, Levenson S, Hingson R. Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77(1):49–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Saitz R, Palfai TP, Cheng DM, Alford DP, Bernstein JA, Lloyd-Travaglini CA, et al. Screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care: the ASPIRE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(5):502–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Saitz R. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(6):631–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Hingson R, Compton WM. Screening and brief intervention and referral to treatment for drug use in primary care: back to the drawing board. JAMA. 2014;312(5):488–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Saitz R. Screening and brief intervention for unhealthy drug use: little or no efficacy. Front Psych. 2014;5:121.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lee JD, Nunes EV Jr, Novo P, Bachrach K, Bailey GL, Bhatt S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10118):309–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Fiellin DA, Pantalon MV, Chawarski MC, Moore BA, Sullivan LE, O’Connor PG, et al. Counseling plus buprenorphine-naloxone maintenance therapy for opioid dependence. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):365–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Missouri Department of Mental Health Division of Behavioral Health. Provider Implementation Guide for the State Targeted Response Opioid Crisis Grant (Opioid STR). Jefferson City: Missouri Department of Mental Health; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Schwartz RP, Kelly SM, O’Grady KE, Gandhi D, Jaffe JH. Interim methadone treatment compared to standard methadone treatment: 4-month findings. J Subst Abus Treat. 2011;41(1):21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Skinner BF. The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century; 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Higgins ST, Silverman K, editors. Motivating behavior change among illicit-drug abusers: research on contingency management interventions. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 1999. xv, 399-xv, p.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Petry NM, Stitzer ML. Contingency management: Using motivational incentives to improve drug abuse treatment. Yale University Psychotherapy Development Center Training Series No. 62002.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, Badger GJ, Higgins ST. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction. 2006;101(2):192–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, Greenwell L, Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2006;101(11):1546–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Ainscough TS, McNeill A, Strang J, Calder R, Brose LS. Contingency management interventions for non-prescribed drug use during treatment for opiate addiction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:318–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Schottenfeld RS, Chawarski MC, Pakes JR, Pantalon MV, Carroll KM, Kosten TR. Methadone versus buprenorphine with contingency management or performance feedback for cocaine and opioid dependence. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(2):340–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, O’Connor PG, Eagan DA, Frankforter TL, et al. Targeting behavioral therapies to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: efficacy of contingency management and significant other involvement. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(8):755–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Bickel WK, Amass L, Higgins ST, Badger GJ, Esch RA. Effects of adding behavioral treatment to opioid detoxification with buprenorphine. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65(5):803–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Carroll KM, Sinha R, Nich C, Babuscio T, Rounsaville BJ. Contingency management to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: a randomized clinical trial of reinforcement magnitude. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;10(1):54–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Carroll KM, Weiss RD. The role of behavioral interventions in buprenorphine maintenance treatment: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(8):738–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, Petry NM. Changing network support for drinking: network support project 2-year follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(2):229–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Copenhaver MM, Bruce RD, Altice FL. Behavioral counseling content for optimizing the use of buprenorphine for treatment of opioid dependence in community-based settings: a review of the empirical evidence. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(5):643–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Dennis ML, Scott CK. Four-year outcomes from the Early Re-Intervention (ERI) experiment using Recovery Management Checkups (RMCs). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;121(1–2):10–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. McCollister KE, French MT, Freitas DM, Dennis ML, Scott CK, Funk RR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Recovery Management Checkups (RMC) for adults with chronic substance use disorders: evidence from a 4-year randomized trial. Addiction. 2013;108(12):2166–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Scott CK, Grella CE, Nicholson L, Dennis ML. Opioid recovery initiation: Pilot test of a peer outreach and modified Recovery Management Checkup intervention for out-of-treatment opioid users. J Subst Abus Treat. 2018;86:30–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Bergman BG, Greene MC, Hoeppner BB, Kelly JF. Expanding the reach of alcohol and other drug services: prevalence and correlates of US adult engagement with online technology to address substance problems. Addict Behav. 2018;87:74–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. D’Agostino AR, Optican AR, Sowles SJ, Krauss MJ, Escobar Lee K, Cavazos-Rehg PA. Social networking online to recover from opioid use disorder: a study of community interactions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;181:5–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Grant BF, Saha TD, Ruan WJ, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Jung J, et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 drug use disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. JAMA Psychiat. 2016;73(1):39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. NSDUH series H-53, HHS publication no. (SMA) 18–5068. Rockville: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Hser YI, Longshore D, Anglin MD. The life course perspective on drug use: a conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Eval Rev. 2007;31(6):515–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Hser Y-I, Anglin MD. Addiction treatment and recovery careers. In: Kelly JF, White WL, editors. Addiction recovery management: theory, research, and practice. Current Clinical Psychiatry. New York: Spring Science+Business Media; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Morgan JR, Schackman BR, Leff JA, Linas BP, Walley AY. Injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, and buprenorphine utilization and discontinuation among individuals treated for opioid use disorder in a United States commercially insured population. J Subst Abus Treat. 2018;85:90–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Hadland SE, Wharam J, Schuster MA, Zhang F, Samet JH, Larochelle MR. Trends in receipt of buprenorphine and naltrexone for opioid use disorder among adolescents and young adults, 2001-2014. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(8):747–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Hadland SE, Bagley SM, Rodean J, et al. Receipt of timely addiction treatment and association of early medication treatment with retention in care among youths with opioid use disorder. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(11):1029–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Schuman-Olivier Z, Weiss RD, Hoeppner BB, Borodovsky J, Albanese MJ. Emerging adult age status predicts poor buprenorphine treatment retention. J Subst Abus Treat. 2014;47(3):202–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Bergman BG, Kelly JF, Nargiso JE, McKowen JW. “The age of feeling in-between”: addressing challenges in the treatment of emerging adults with substance use disorders. Cogn Behav Pract. 2016;23(3):270–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Committee On Substance Use and Prevention. Medication-assisted treatment of adolescents with opioid use disorders. Pediatrics. 2016;138(3).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Subramaniam GA, Ives ML, Stitzer ML, Dennis ML. The added risk of opioid problem use among treatment-seeking youth with marijuana and/or alcohol problem use. Addiction. 2010;105(4):686–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Subramaniam GA, Stitzer ML, Woody G, Fishman MJ, Kolodner K. Clinical characteristics of treatment-seeking adolescents with opioid versus cannabis/alcohol use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009;99(1–3):141–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Carew AM, Comiskey C. Treatment for opioid use and outcomes in older adults: a systematic literature review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;182:48–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Satre DD, Mertens JR, Arean PA, Weisner C. Five-year alcohol and drug treatment outcomes of older adults versus middle-aged and younger adults in a managed care program. Addiction. 2004;99(10):1286–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Task Force. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. xliv, 947 p.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Kessler RC, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Berglund PA, Caraveo-Anduaga JJ, DeWit DJ, Greenfield SF, et al. Patterns and predictors of treatment seeking after onset of a substance use disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:1065–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Schuman-Olivier Z, Claire Greene M, Bergman BG, Kelly JF. Is residential treatment effective for opioid use disorders? A longitudinal comparison of treatment outcomes among opioid dependent, opioid misusing, and non-opioid using emerging adults with substance use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;144:178–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Bogenschutz MP. Individual and contextual factors that influence AA affiliation and outcomes. In: Galanter M, Kaskutas LA, editors. Research on Alcoholics Anonymous and spirituality in addiction recovery recent developments in alcoholism. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2008. p. 413–33.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Behar E, Santos GM, Wheeler E, Rowe C, Coffin PO. Brief overdose education is sufficient for naloxone distribution to opioid users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;148:209–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Dunn KE, Yepez-Laubach C, Nuzzo PA, Fingerhood M, Kelly A, Berman S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a computerized opioid overdose education intervention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;173(Suppl 1):S39–47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Marsch LA, Dallery J. Advances in the psychosocial treatment of addiction: the role of technology in the delivery of evidence-based psychosocial treatment. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2012;35(2):481–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  143. Witkiewitz K, Votaw VR, Vowles KE, Kranzler HR. Opioid misuse as a predictor of alcohol treatment outcomes in the COMBINE study: mediation by medication adherence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42(7):1249–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon G. Bergman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bergman, B.G., Fallah-Sohy, N., Hoffman, L.A., Kelly, J.F. (2019). Psychosocial Approaches in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorders. In: Kelly, J., Wakeman, S. (eds) Treating Opioid Addiction. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16257-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16257-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16256-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16257-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics