Maternal Outcasts: Governing Vulnerable Mothers in Advanced Marginality

  • Larissa PoveyEmail author


This chapter extends and nuances Wacquant’s framework of advanced marginality through a focus on the management of ‘maternal outcasts’, which has been under-researched and under-theorised. It examines the role of the state in constructing and governing ‘bad’ or ‘failed’ mothers and their experiences of (in some cases) recurrent child removal. Wacquant’s thesis of the expansive penal state provides a useful framework to make sense of the technologies and techniques of child removal from vulnerable birth mothers. It highlights the destructive cycle of successive pregnancies and child removal—raising important questions around the ethicality and efficacy of these state interventions—and how symbolic state power is enacted against mothers to perpetuate, reinforce and reproduce hyper-marginalisation.


  1. Adamson, P. (2014). Measuring child poverty: New league tables of child poverty in the world’s rich countries. UNICEF. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  2. Ball, E., Batty, E., & Flint, J. (2016). Intensive family intervention and the problem figuration of “troubled families”. Social Policy and Society, 15(2), 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1977 [1972]). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, T., Breitenbach, M., Dieterich, W., Salisbury, E., & Van Voorhis, P. (2012). Women’s pathways to serious and habitual crime: A person-centered analysis incorporating gender responsive factors. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(11), 1481–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadhurst, K., Shaw, M., Kershaw, S., Harwin, J., Alrouh, B., Mason, C., & Pilling, M. (2015). Vulnerable birth mothers and repeat losses of infants to public care: Is targeted reproductive health care ethically defensible? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37(1), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, K. (2014). Questioning the vulnerability zeitgeist: Care and control practices with ‘vulnerable’ young people. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 371–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bumiller, K. (2013). Incarceration, welfare state and labour market nexus. In B. Carlton & M. Segrave (Eds.), Women exiting prison: Critical essays on gender, post-release support and survival (pp. 13–33). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cafcass (2017). Child contact centre. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  10. Covington, S., & Bloom, B. (2007). Gender responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. Women and Therapy, 29(3–4), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Department for Education (2017). Children looked after in England (including adoption), year ending 31 March 2017. London: Department for Education. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  12. Flint, J. (2018). Encounters with the centaur state: Advanced urban marginality and the practices and ethics of welfare sanctions regimes. Urban Studies. Retrieved from
  13. Fokken, S. (2016, June 6). Kind bei Pflegeeltern “Man kann das mit einer Amputation vergleichen”. Spiegel Online. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  14. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gelsthorpe, L. (2010). Women, crime and control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10(4), 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillies, V. (2007). Marginalised mothers: Exploring working-class experiences of parenting. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Grella, C., Stein, J., & Greenwell, L. (2005). Associations among childhood trauma, adolescent problem behaviors, and adverse adult outcomes in substance-abusing women offenders. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huber, A., Rope, O., & Sheahan, F. (2017). Global prison trends 2017. London: Penal Reform International. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  19. Johnsen, S., May, J., & Cloke, P. (2008). Imag(in)ing homeless places: Using auto-photography to (re)examine the geographies of homelessness. Area, 40(2), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2017). Child poverty. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  21. Larkin, H., Felitti, V., & Anda, R. (2014). Social work and adverse childhood experiences research: Implications for practice and health policy. Social Work in Public Health, 29(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lister, R. (2007). Inclusive citizenship: Realizing the potential. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lloyd, A. (1995). Doubly deviant, doubly damned: Society’s treatment of violent women. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, M. (2011). Theorizing punishment: Reflections on Wacquant’s punishing the poor. Critical Sociology, 37(2), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, D., & Wilcox, P. (2012). Women, welfare and the carceral state. In P. Squires & J. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loïc Wacquant (pp. 151–170). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Measor, L. (2012). Loïc Wacquant, gender and cultures of resistance. In P. Squires & J. Lea (Eds.), Criminalisation and advanced marginality: Critically exploring the work of Loïc Wacquant (pp. 129–150). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Murray, L., Nguyen, A., & Cohen, J. (2014). Child sexual abuse. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 23(2), 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patrick, R. (2012). Work as the primary ‘duty’ of the responsible citizen: A critique of this work-centric approach. People, Place & Policy Online, 6(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piven, F. (2010). A response to Wacquant. Theoretical Criminology, 14(1), 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prison Reform Trust. (2017). Bromley briefings prison factfile: Autumn 2017, London: Prison Reform Trust. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from
  31. Roberts, A. (2017). Gendered states of punishment and welfare: Feminist political economy, primitive accumulation and the law. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  32. Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Swift, K. (1995). Manufacturing “bad mothers”: A critical perspective on child neglect. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ubbesen, M., Petersen, L., Mortensen, B., & Kristensen, O. (2012). Out of care and into care again: A Danish register-based study of children placed in out-of-home care before their third birthday. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2147–2155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wacquant, L. (2004). Body & soul: Notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wacquant, L. (2008). Ordering insecurity: Social polarization and the punitive upsurge. Radical Philosophy Review, 11(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wacquant, L. (2014). Marginality, ethnicity and penality in the neo-liberal city: An analytic cartography. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(10), 1687–1711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Webster, D. (2014). JSA sanctions and disallowances. Evidence submitted to the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee Inquiry into the Role of Jobcentre Plus in the reformed welfare system, Second Report of Session 2013–14, Vol. II, p: Ev w90–w101. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law and CriminologySheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations