Skip to main content

Using the SPAR Ontology Network to Represent the Scientific Production of a University: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'19 2019)

Abstract

Research is commonly used to measure the prestige of universities. Currently, many universities register some of their scientific production (such as thesis, articles) in open access repositories using technologies like DSpace or ePrints. Likewise, scientific production is available in different and overlapping databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Crossref. Connecting these datasets, with the application of ontologies, will potentially increase their value and help discover interesting relationships amongst them. The present study aims to use the SPAR Ontology Network, which allows representing scholarly publishing, in order to check whether it is possible to represent the scientific production of universities. For that, we propose competency questions with the purpose of measuring scientific production. Likewise, we obtained data from Scopus regarding an Ecuadorian university (University of Guayaquil) and transformed it to RDF using the SPAR Ontology Network and other well-known ontologies to build it semantically. We used SPARQL queries to answer the competency questions. We concluded that the SPAR Ontology Network is a wide-ranging solution for scholarly publishing. Nevertheless, it is necessary to build an extension to one of their ontologies to provide a complete representation of a university’s scientific production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/university.

  2. 2.

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2536258.

References

  1. Pascal-Nicolas, B.: Linked (Open) Data - DSpace 5.x Documentation. DuraSpace Wiki (2015). https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC5x/Linked+%28Open%29+Data

  2. ePrints Repository Softoware: New Features in EPrints 3.2. EPrints Documentation (2018). https://wiki.eprints.org/w/New_Features_in_EPrints_3.2#Linked_Data_Support

  3. Omitola, T., et al.: Integrating public datasets using linked data: challenges and design principles. In: Future Internet Assembly Future Internet Assembly, pp. 1–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Santarém Segundo, J.E., Coneglian, C.S., Lucas, E.R.O.: Concepts and technologies of the semantic Web for academic-scientific cooperation: a study within the Vivo platform. Transinformaco 29(3), 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an Ontology?. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Shotton, D.: Semantic publishing: the coming revolution. Learn. Publ. 22(2), 85–94 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peroni, S., Shotton, D.: The SPAR ontologies. In: 17th International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 119–136 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piedra Salomón, Y., Martínez Rodríguez, A.: Scientific production. Ciencias la Inf. 38(3), 33–38 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Spinak, E.: Diccionario enciclopédico de Bibliometría. Cienciometría e Informetría. UNESCO, Caracas (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Asamblea Nacional: Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior (LOES) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guimar´es Pompío de Camargo, M.V.: Pesquisador científico: Avaliação de produçao (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library: Scholarly Publishing (2018). http://libguides.gwumc.edu/scholarlypub

  13. Constantin, A., Peroni, S., Pettifer, S., Shotton, D., Vitali, F.: The Document Components Ontology (DoCO). Semant. Web 7, 167–181 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peroni, S., Shotton, D.: FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations. J. Web Semant. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 17, 1–15 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CEAACES: Modelo genérico de evaluación del entorno de aprendizaje de carreras en Ecuador (2017). https://bit.ly/2Dvp5iK

  16. Ciccarese, P., Peroni, S.: Essential FRBR in OWL2 DL (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The first author of this article is very grateful to the members of the Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) of the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid who gave her the opportunity to be part of their group. Likewise, a special thanks to the Universidad de Guayaquil who financed her stay within the OEG group.

Funding

This work was partially supported by DATOS 4.0: RETOS Y SOLUCIONES – UPM Spanish national project (TIN2016-78011-C4-4-R).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariela Tapia-Leon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tapia-Leon, M., Chicaiza Espinosa, J., Espinoza Arias, P., Santana-Perez, I., Corcho, O. (2019). Using the SPAR Ontology Network to Represent the Scientific Production of a University: A Case Study. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'19 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 932. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16187-3_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics