The Sacred Experiences of Filipino Youth

  • Jeane C. PeraculloEmail author
  • Rito V. Baring
  • Dennis S. Erasga
  • Leni de la Rosa Garcia
  • Lars Raymund Ubaldo
Part of the Boundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies book series (BOREFRRERE)


This chapter presents qualitative data of a study regarding the conceptualisations of the sacred of young people in Mindanao and Manila in the Philippines. The young people involved in the authors’ study produced essays and conceptual maps to represent their views of the sacred. Drawing on the conceptual taxonomy of the sacred in the Philippines, the authors developed an analytic schema from the data arising from this project. A lecture by José de Mesa (delivered on 15 January 2013 at De La Salle University, Philippines, 2013), a prominent Filipino theologian, on a new way to approach God helped the researchers develop their conceptual taxonomy of the sacred in the Philippines, as his work speaks to the Filipino context. This allowed them to frame the Filipino youth’s conceptualisations of the sacred in terms of three concepts: banal (holy), maganda (beautiful), and ritwal (ritual). Young people’s responses in this study indicate that young people in the Philippines might be inclined towards negotiating spaces and contexts within a community-building framework that draws from their conceptualisations of the sacred as they relate to peace in their own multicultural contexts.


Sacred Profane Filipino youth Attitudes Spirituality 


  1. Ammerman, N. (Ed.) (2007). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baring, R., Erasga, D., Garcia, E., Peracullo, J., & Ubaldo, L. R. (2017). The young and the sacred: An analysis of empirical evidence from the Philippines. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 25(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baring, R., Sarmiento, P. J., Sibug, N., Lumanlan, P., Bonus, B., Samia, C., & Reysen, S. (2018). Filipino college students’ attitudes towards religion: An analysis of the underlying factors. Religions, 9(3). Scholar
  4. Bierlein, J. F. (1994). Parallel myths. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. Davie, G. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Day, A. (2009). Believing in belonging: An ethnography of young people’s constructions of belief. Culture and Religion, 10(3), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Day, A., Vincett, G., & Cotter, C. (2013). Social identities between the sacred and the secular. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  8. Demerath, N. J., III. (1999). The varieties of sacred experience: Finding the sacred in the secular grove. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Mesa, J. (2008). Bakas: Retrieving the sense of sacramentality in the ordinary. Quezon City: Anvil Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. de Mesa, J. (2013). Bakas. Lecture delivered on 15 January 2013 at De La Salle University, Philippines.Google Scholar
  11. Demographic Research and Development Foundation (DRDF) and University of the Philippines Population Institute (UPPI). (2002). 2002 young adult fertility and sexuality study: Key findings. Quezon City: DRDF and UPPI.Google Scholar
  12. Durkheim, E. (1912). Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Paris: Alcan. English edition. (1915). The Elementary forms of the religious life: A study in religious sociology. Trans. J. S. Swain. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Dunlop, S., & Ward, P. (2012). From obligation to consumption in two-and-a-half hours: A visual exploration of the sacred with young Polish migrants. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27(3), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graben, S. (2014). Resourceful impacts: Harm and valuation of the sacred. University of Toronto Law Journal, 64(1), 64–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krok, D. (2015). Religiousness, spirituality, and coping with stress among late adolescents: A meaning-making perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McDannell, C. (2012). Scrambling the sacred and the profane. In G. Lynch, J. Mitchell, & A. Strhan (eds.), Religion, media and culture (pp. 135–146). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Mercado, E. (2014). Understanding the bangsamoro construct. GMA News. 26 February. Accessed 16 October 2016.
  19. Nelson, L. P. (Ed.) (2006). American sanctuary: Understanding sacred spaces. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Otto, R. (1991) [orig. 1936]. The idea of the holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pargament, K. I., Magyar, G. M., Benore, E., & Mahoney, A. (2005). Sacrilege: A study of sacred loss and desecration and their implications for health and well-being in a community sample. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018). National quickstat for 2018. Accessed 17 June 2018.
  23. Puyat, J. (2005). The Filipino youth today: Their strengths and the challenges they face. In F. Gale & S. Fahey (Eds.), Youth in transition: The challenges of generational change in Asia (pp. 192–205). Canberra: The Association of Asian Social Science Research Councils (AASSREC).Google Scholar
  24. Roxas, P. A. (2018). House approves BBL on third and final reading. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 31 May. Accessed 31 May 2018.
  25. Wiegele, K. L. (2005). Investing in miracles: El shaddai and the transformation of popular Catholicism in the Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeane C. Peracullo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rito V. Baring
    • 2
  • Dennis S. Erasga
    • 3
  • Leni de la Rosa Garcia
    • 4
  • Lars Raymund Ubaldo
    • 5
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines
  2. 2.Theology and Religious EducationDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines
  3. 3.Behavioral Sciences DepartmentDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines
  4. 4.Philosophy Department, College of Liberal ArtsDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines
  5. 5.College of Liberal ArtsDe La Salle UniversityManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations