Skip to main content

Learning Pretopological Spaces to Extract Ego-Centered Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11440))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2143 Accesses

Abstract

We present a pretopological based approach to extract ego-centered communities. Classical methods often consider only one structural feature of the network, whereas pretopology enables to do multi-criteria analysis. Our approach consists in learning a logical combination of network’s descriptors to define a pretopological space. Ego-centered communities are extracted by computing the elementary closure of each node. The quality of such communities is evaluated against the ground truth communities. We show the benefits of our method by comparing it to others on both real and synthetic networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.espn.com/college-football/standings/_/season/2006.

  2. 2.

    Let us notice that in practice, few examples are sufficient for driving efficiently the learning process.

References

  1. Belmandt, Z.: Basics of Pretopology. Hermann, Paris (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caillaut, G., Cleuziou, G.: Learning pretopological spaces to model complex propagation phenomena: a multiple instance learning approach based on a logical modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.01278 (2018)

  3. Chen, J., Zaïane, O.R., Goebel, R.: Local community identification in social networks. In: ASONAM, pp. 237–242 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clauset, A.: Finding local community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 72(2), 026132 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cleuziou, G., Dias, G.: Learning pretopological spaces for lexical taxonomy acquisition. In: Appice, A., Rodrigues, P.P., Santos Costa, V., Gama, J., Jorge, A., Soares, C. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9285, pp. 493–508. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23525-7_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalud-Vincent, M.: Une autre manière de modéliser les réseaux sociaux. Applications à l’étude de co-publications. Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales 12(2), 41–68 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Danisch, M., Guillaume, J., Grand, B.L.: Towards multi-ego-centred communities: a node similarity approach. IJWBC 9(3), 299–322 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Figueiredo, D.R., Ribeiro, L.F.R., Saverese, P.H.P.: struc2vec: learning node representations from structural identity. In: KDD (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grover, A., Leskovec, J.: node2vec: scalable feature learning for networks. In: KDD, pp. 855–864. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lancichinetti, A., Fortunato, S.: Benchmarks for testing community detection algorithms on directed and weighted graphs with overlapping communities. Phys. Rev. E 80(1), 016118 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, X., Kuzmin, K., Chen, M., Szymanski, B.K.: Adaptive modularity maximization via edge weighting scheme. Inf. Sci. 424(C), 55–68 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, F., Wang, J.Z., Promislow, E.: Exploring local community structures in large networks. Web Intell. Agent Syst. 6(4), 387–400 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, M.E.: Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103(23), 8577–8582 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435(7043), 814 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zachary, W.W.: An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J. Anthropol. Res. 33(4), 452–473 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaëtan Caillaut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Caillaut, G., Cleuziou, G., Dugué, N. (2019). Learning Pretopological Spaces to Extract Ego-Centered Communities. In: Yang, Q., Zhou, ZH., Gong, Z., Zhang, ML., Huang, SJ. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11440. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16145-3_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16145-3_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16144-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16145-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics