Skip to main content

Abstract

Observation is one of the oldest research methods and when done well it is a source of rich ethnographic data. A review of two uses of observation is provided in a three-year international project ‘Organisational culture of public service media in the digital mediascapes: people, values and processes’ (2015–2018). The aim of the project is to assist the adaptation of public service media to the fourth industrial—data-driven—revolution through the development of policy and practice. Firstly, city ‘walkabouts’ provide contextual data to support 150 interviews, second young people were observed as they discussed and imagined new forms of public service media. As an Industry Study ‘walkabouts’ of urban regeneration areas and offices assisted the researchers to gain an understanding of the internal culture of firms situated within ten high technology clusters in North America and Europe. The use of observation for Audience Studies is offered in the case of a creative workshop with 25 young people aged 16–20; ‘Generation Z’. This provided an opportunity to find out what data-driven services they would like public service media to be launching in the future. An historical account of observation as a scientific method opens the chapter followed by a short review of its adoption by media and communication scholars. A critical discussion of the definition, logic and rationale for using observation in research that aims to support the evolution of the public media enterprise and related policy follows. A detailed description of two case studies provides two contrasting instances of the use of observation as a method. How to conduct observations, the capturing/storage/retrieval of observational data, and its analysis and use are considered in some detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Born, G. (2005). Uncertain vision: Birt, Dyke and the reinvention of the BBC. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. (1977). The BBC: Public institution and private world. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, K., & Atwal, A. (2005). Non-participant observation: Using video tapes to collect data in nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 13, 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2012). Recommendation CM/Rec(2012)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on public service media governance. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?p=&Ref=CM/Rec%282012%291&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&BackColorIntranet=EDB021&BackColorLogged=F5D383&direct=true.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; and Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2012). Medialife. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. London; New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. (2011). Paranormal media: Audiences, spirits and magic in popular culture. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. (2013). Participant observation in health research. In M. Saks & J. Allsop (Eds.), Researching health: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. London; Thousand Oaks; and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L., Gauntlett, D., & Steemers, J. (2009). Children in virtual worlds—Adventure Rock users and producers study. London: BBC and University of Westminster. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/knowledgeexchange/westminsterone.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2017.

  • Jackson, L., & Pereira, L. (2015). Testing participatory design and responsive user-interfaces to teach digital skills to NEETs: Using an experimental online learning platform. The Media Education and Research Journal, 16(2), 97–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, C., & Picard, R. (Eds.). (2011). Media clusters: Spatial agglomeration and content capabilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorowski, M. (2016). The seven parameters of media clusters: An integrated approach for local cluster analysis. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 12(2), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuah, A. T. H. (2002). Cluster theory and practice: Advantages for the small business locating in a vibrant cluster. Journal of Research in Marketing and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 206–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, J., & Bowden, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Chicago school diaspora: Epistemology and substance. New Brunswick: MQUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, G. F., & Brown, C. (Eds.). (2016). Managing media firms and industries: What’s so special about media management? London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1966). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohen and West Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2007). The manual of ethnography. New York; Oxford: Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; and Washington, DC: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S., Pullon, S., Macdonald, L., McKinlay, E., & Gray, B. (2017). Qualitative Health Research, 27(7), 1552–7557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2006). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London; Thousand Oaks; and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P. (1978). Putting ‘reality’ together. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, K., Drotner, K., Kline, S., & Murray, C. (2003). Researching audiences. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, H. B. (1992). Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park; London; and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiach, M., & Virani, T. (Eds.). (2017). Cultural policy, innovation, and the creative economy: Creative collaborations in arts and humanities research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London; Thousand Oaks; and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). London; Thousand Oaks; and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (Eds.). (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg, P., & Piotrowski, J. (2017). Plugged in: How media attract and affect youth. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, C., Ewing, G., & Griffiths, J. (2012). Using observation as a data collection method to help understand patient and professional roles and actions in palliative care settings. Palliative Medicine, 26, 1048–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Baszanger, I., & Dodier, N. (1997). Ethnography: Relating the part to the whole. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London; Thousand Oaks; and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillham, B. (2008). Observation techniques: Structured and unstructured approaches. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pole, C., & Hillyard, S. (2016). Doing fieldwork. Los Angeles; London; New Delhi; Singapore; and Washington, DC: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1980/2016). Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The observations were conducted as part of a three-year international study (2015–2018), ‘Organisational culture of public service media in the digital mediascapes: People, values and processes’ funded by the National Science Centre (NCN), SONATA 8. For more information: www.creativemediaclusters.com.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jackson, L., Głowacki, M. (2019). Watching People: Observations. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics