Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to gain an understanding of the perceptions and needs of caregivers looking after the elderly or those with multiple disabilities with regard to the use of technology in the course of their work, in order to design the associated training.
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of 10 caregivers from different disciplines caring for the elderly or those with multiple disabilities in Spain.
Results: There is a generalized personalized use of ICT that cannot easily be transferred to caregiving duties. The difference between formal and informal care does not seem to be as important as the type of work performed: nevertheless, formal caregivers display a standardized pattern in their responses, perceiving a potential benefit and an ease in incorporating technology, but this is not accompanied by any social influence or conditions to facilitate this. With regard to the pattern of informal caregivers’ responses, although the same tendency can be noted, some uncertainty can be appreciated, particularly with regard to performance expectancy.
As a conclusion, although the benefits that technology could bring to caregivers’ tasks are perceived, no organizational or family-based context to promote or facilitate it can be appreciated, and it is this that might be the primary target of the first stage of training. In a second phase, training for caregivers would be focused on the effective use of technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chiarini, G., Ray, P., Akter, S., Masella, C., Ganz, A.: MHealth technologies for chronic diseases and elders: a systematic review. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 9, 6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP.0513001
Mostaghel, R.: Innovation and technology for the elderly: systematic literature review. J. Bus. Res. 69, 4896–4900 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.049
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. Source MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Brown, S.A., Venkatesh, V.: A model of adoption of technology in the household: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Q. 29(4), 399–426 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240600791333
Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G., Cheung, C.M.K.: How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Q. 31(4), 705–737 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
Yu, P., Li, H., Gagnon, M.-P.: Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. Int. J. Med. Inform. 78, 229 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.006
Axelsson, S.W., Wikman, A.M., Näslund, A., Nyberg, L.: Older people’s health-related ICT-use in Sweden. Gerontechnology (2013). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2013.12.1.010.00
Quintiliani, L.M., Reddy, S., Goodman, R., Bowen, D.J.: Information and communication technology use by female residents of public housing. mHealth (2016). https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2016.10.01
Selwyn, N.: The information aged: a qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. J. Aging Stud. 18, 369–384 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.008
Turner, P., Turner, S., Van De Walle, G.: How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26(4), 287–296 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601173499
Twigg, J.: Carework as a form of bodywork. Ageing Soc. 20(4), 389–411 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X99007801
Elwick, A., Liabo, K., Nutt, J., Simon, A.: Beyond the digital divide: young people and ICT. Read CfBT Educ Trust SSRU Inst Educ (2013)
Pols, J.: Review of Care at a distance: on the closeness of technology (2012)
Roberts, C., Mort, M., Milligan, C.: Calling for care: “disembodied” work, teleoperators and older people living at home. Sociology 46(3), 490–506 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511422551
López, D., Sánchez-Criado, T.: Analysing hands-on-tech care work in telecare installations. In: Prendergast, D., Garattini, C. (eds.) Aging and the Digital Life Course, pp. 179–197. Berghahn Books, New York (2015)
Hernández-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., Gómez-Zúniga, B.: ICT and older people: beyond usability. Educ. Gerontol. 35(3), 226–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802466934
Skymne, C., Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., Claesson, L., Eklund, K.: Getting used to assistive devices: ambivalent experiences by frail elderly persons. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 19(2), 194–203 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2011.569757
Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 1, 120–125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462307080154
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge all the caregivers who shared their doubts, insights and experiences. This work is based on a larger research project supported by the Erasmus+ program under Grant No. 2017-1-DE02-KA202-004212. TechCare project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hernández-Encuentra, E. et al. (2019). Perceptions and Needs with Regard to Technologies for Professional Practice. In: García-Alonso, J., Fonseca, C. (eds) Gerontechnology. IWoG 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16028-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16028-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16027-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16028-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)