Skip to main content

The Survival of the Happiest Who (Get to) Control the Resources and Procreation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 330 Accesses

Abstract

Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution emphasized happiness and self-control as evolutionary signs of the superior human fitness found primarily among the British upper class males. Darwin’s promotion of sexist, racist, and colonialist views of human differences underlie his scientific observations of the role of emotions among both animals and humans. This chapter also introduces alternative theories to Darwin’s “survival of the fittest in control over procreation” emphasis, including Lamarck’s contextually-focused evolutionary theory and Kropotkin’s evolutionary emphasis on “mutual aid” and interdependence. Darwinist views on human differences and emotional states are connected to the development of subsequent versions of social Darwinism, eugenics, and other forms of ideological sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bergman, J. (2014). The Darwin effect: It’s influence on nazism, eugenics, racism, communism, capitalism & sexism. Green Forest, AR: New Leaf Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2009). The great struggles of life: Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary psychology. American Psychologist, 64(2), 140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S. (1911). Evolution, old and new: Or the theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck, as compared with that of Charles Darwin. London, UK: Kessinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, E. (1889). Civilisation: Its cause and cure. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, A. (1980). The legacy of Malthus: The social costs of the new scientific racism. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species: Or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: Down, Bromley, Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1889). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1898). The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter (F. Darwin, Ed., Rev. ed.). London, UK: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadjev, I. (2015). Nature and nurture: Lamarck’s legacy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 114(1), 242–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (1914/2012). Mutual aid: A factor of evolution. Mineola, NY: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarck, J.-B. (1809). Zoological philosophy. In J. A. Hammerton (Ed.) (2008), The world’s greatest books (Vol. 15). Science. Wm. H. Wise & Co (Online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, A. S. (1901). Lamarck, the founder of evolution: His life and work. London, UK: Longmans, Green, and Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, P., & Johnson, R. H. (1935). Applied eugenics (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. (1908). Comrade Kropotkin. New York, NY: The Altrurians.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H., & Rose, S. (2010). Alas poor Darwin: Arguments against evolutionary psychology. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S. A., & Bhatia, S. (2009). Darwin on race, gender, and culture. American Psychologist, 64(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, W. H. (1996). The science and politics of racial research. Carbondale, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology: From the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yakushko, O. (2019). The Survival of the Happiest Who (Get to) Control the Resources and Procreation. In: Scientific Pollyannaism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15982-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics