Abstract
In May 1968 there was a strong sense of left-wing camaraderie that drew many French university students into collaboration with the workers’ unions to rise up against de Gaulle’s government. It is highly unlikely that British campuses could be gripped by these values of solidarity and shared agency in a common cause: what can that tell us about Britain? In Britain there are assumptions on the part of many young adults that we are free, equal and fraternal. The parallel digital world that they inhabit so comfortably appears to encourage and facilitate consumer behaviour and freedom of expression: it seems possible to buy and write online almost exactly what you like without consequences. Yet against a backdrop of crass populist discourse there are urgent issues regarding ethical behaviour: online and offline use of language is sharply racialised and gendered. People of colour and women of all ages are frequently attacked. Hate speech is poorly controlled and legal restraints are lagging behind the global digital empires. In addition, on campus the British government is intervening much more than ever before, which makes some students less free, less equal and less fraternal than others. Free speech is being constrained. Populism is on the rise, framed by political alienation. Finally, precarity affects the young in their responses to university: is it worth incurring the debt of high fees? The philosophy of Ricoeur and Lorey show how to interrogate dominant discourses and attempt a better world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ali, T. (2018). That was the year that was London Review of Books, pp. 3–10.
BBC. (2018a). Exeter university students suspended over racism and rape claims. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-43473517.
BBC. (2018b). University of Warwick suspends 11 students over hate posts. BBC News. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-44052070.
Beloff, M. (2018, June 15). Learning for earning’s sake. Times Literary Supplement. pp. 12–13.
Collini, S. (2018, May 10). Diary London Review of Books, pp. 38–39
Higher Education Policy Institute Keeping Schtum. (2016). http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Hepi_Keeping-Schtum-Report-85-Web.pdf.
Heath-Kelly, C. (2017). The geography of pre-criminal space: Epidemiological imaginations of radicalisation risk in the UK prevent strategy, 2007-2017. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10, 297–310.
JCHR. (2018). Freedom of speech in universities (Fourth Report of Session 2017–19 HC 589/HL Paper 111). London: UK Parliament. House of Commons and House of Lords.
Lee, Y., & Scott-Baumann, A. (2019). Digital ecology of free speech: Authenticity, identity, and self-censorship. In S. Yates & R. E. Rice (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of digital technology and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lorey, I. (2012). State of insecurity. London: Verso Books.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1974). In D. Stewart & J. Bien (Eds.), Violence and language in political and social essays. Athens: Ohio State University Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Elements of diffusion. Diffusion of Innovations, 5(1.38).
Scott-Baumann, A. (2017a). Ideology, utopia and Islam on campus: How to free speech a little from its own terrors. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice: Special Issue on Prevent. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197917694183.
Scott-Baumann, A. (2017b, October). No platform and safe spaces aren’t the real dangers to freedom of speech. Guardian HE online. https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2017/oct/25/no-platform-and-safe-spaces-arent-the-real-dangers-to-freedom-of-speech.
Scott-Baumann, A. (2018a). Trust within reason: How to trump the hermeneutics of suspicion on campus. In A. Yaqin, P. Morey, & A. Soliman (Eds.), Muslims, multiculturalism and trust. New York: New Directions Palgrave.
Scott-Baumann, A. (2018b). ‘Dual Use Research of Concern’ and ‘Select Agents’: How researchers can use free speech to avoid ‘Weaponising’ academia’. In Special issue on exploring radicalisation and securitisation from Islamic studies and religious studies perspectives. Journal of Muslims in Europe (Brill), 7(2).
Scott-Baumann, A., & Perfect, S. (2019). Freedom of speech on British university campuses: Islam, charities and counter-terrorism. London: Routledge In preparation.
Taplin, G. (2017). Move fast and break things. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
Vinen, R. (2018). The long ‘68. London: Allen Lane.
Acknowledgements
NOTE: This chapter draws some of its material from a keynote I delivered on 3 May 2018 at King’s College London for a conference on Mai 1968, convened by Prof Ziad Elmarsafy for KCL and Paris Diderot.
The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research is supported by the AHRC: ‘Re/presenting Islam on campus: gender, radicalisation and interreligious understanding in British higher education’ (2015–2018), [AH/M00841X/1] for which Scott-Baumann is PI, with Cheruvallil-Contractor, Guest, Naguib and Phoenix.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott-Baumann, A. (2019). The Values of Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité 50 Years on: Why the ‘Free Speech’ Debate Makes It Even Less Likely That Mai ’68 Could Happen in Britain Now Than It Was Then. In: Gibbs, P., Jameson, J., Elwick, A. (eds) Values of the University in a Time of Uncertainty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15970-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15970-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15969-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15970-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)