Skip to main content

Does Virtue Ethics Allow Us to Make Better Judgments of the Actions of Others?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect
  • 667 Accesses

Abstract

Virtue ethics encourages us to judge the actions of others, not merely as right or wrong, but as virtuous (kind, courageous, just, compassionate, etc.) or vicious (cruel, cowardly, unjust, selfish, etc.). In doing so, however, we risk acting viciously ourselves. That is, our judgments of others can be unfair, unkind, insensitive, uncharitable, or hypocritical, even while being accurate. I argue that in order to make good judgments of the actions of others we should turn to virtue ethics for action guidance. That is, our primary aim should not be to make accurate judgments but to act virtuously when judging others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://metro.co.uk/2018/02/14/dad-dog-hacked-fighting-off-machete-armed-robbers-break-7312973/.

  2. 2.

    Zavaliy (2017) argues, in this regard, that consistent nonjudgmentalism, that is, “a refusal to voice moral disapproval of the behaviour of wrongdoers” is not a virtue, because it involves treating morality as optional.

References

  • Annas, Julia. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annas, Julia. 2004. Being Virtuous and Doing the Right Thing. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78: 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, Julia. 2015. Applying Virtue to Ethics (Society of Applied Philosophy Annual Lecture 2014). Journal of Applied Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Ross David and revised by Brown Lesley. Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, William K. 1973. Ethics, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, Paul. 2003. A Virtue Ethics Approach to Moral Dilemmas in Medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1991. Virtue Theory and Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs 20: 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 2006a. Applying Virtue Ethics to Our Treatment of the Other Animals. In The Practice of Virtue: Classic and Contemporary Readings in Virtue Ethics, edited by J. Welchman, 136–155. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 2006b. Are Virtues the Proper Starting Point for Morality? In Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory, edited by J. Dreier, 99–112. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 2007. Environmental Virtue Ethics. In Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems, edited by R.L. Walker and P.J. Ivanhoe, 155–172. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, Justin. 2013. Virtue Ethics and Bioethics. In The Cambridge Companion to Virtue Ethics, edited by C. Russell Daniel, 197–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Rebecca L., and Philip J. Ivanhoe (eds.). 2007. Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavaliy, Andrei G. 2017. On the Virtue of Judging Others. Philosophical Investigations 40: 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liezl van Zyl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Zyl, L. (2019). Does Virtue Ethics Allow Us to Make Better Judgments of the Actions of Others?. In: Grimi, E. (eds) Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15860-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics