Skip to main content

Some Questions About Virtue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect

Abstract

So far as Anglophone academic study is concerned, interest in the idea of virtue as a central concept in ethical theory only dates from the late 1950s beginning with Elizabeth Anscombe’s “Modern Moral Philosophy” but getting its first specific discussion in Georg Von Wright’s 1963 book The Varieties of Goodness in which he writes: “Virtue is a neglected topic in modern ethics”. As the present essay shows, these words became a common refrain through the 1970s, 80s and 90s. The rise to prominence of ideas of virtue in philosophy and then in educational theory and in psychology, as well as in schemes for establishing good practice in various fields of professional and public life raises questions about how a focus on virtue relates to other ways of evaluating agents and actions, and of how virtue itself may be identified and assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an exemplary neo-Thomist philosophical rather than theological treatment of ethics in which the virtues are extensively discussed see Oesterle (1957), reprinted in Haldane (2004).

  2. 2.

    See Anscombe (1958), reprinted in Geach and Gormally (eds) (2005), and related essays there and in Geach and Gormally (eds) (2008). See also Gormally, Jones and Teichmann (eds) (2016).

  3. 3.

    Anscombe (1958, pp. 4–5).

  4. 4.

    See Anscombe (1956, 1957a, b).

  5. 5.

    Anscombe (1958, pp. 14–15).

  6. 6.

    See Thompson (2008 Chaps. 1–4, 10 and 11).

  7. 7.

    Von Wright (1963, pp. 136–137).

  8. 8.

    MacIntyre (1966, pp. 262–263).

  9. 9.

    Foot (1965, p. 242).

  10. 10.

    Foot (1978, pp. 2–3).

  11. 11.

    Geach (1977, pp. 1 and 16.)

  12. 12.

    Hursthouse (1999, pp. 1–5).

  13. 13.

    See Haldane (1989, 1991, 2017), some parts of the following section draw from the last of these essays.

  14. 14.

    Summa Theologiae, Ia, IIae, q 94, a 2 responsio.

  15. 15.

    Summa Theologiae, Ia, IIae, q 6, prologue.

  16. 16.

    Summa Theologiae, Ia, IIae, q 58, a 4 responsio.

  17. 17.

    Summa Theologiae Ia, IIae, q. 18, a 9 responsio.

  18. 18.

    For a discussion of these themes see Snow, Wright, and Warren forthcoming.

  19. 19.

    Jubilee (2017, p. 2).

  20. 20.

    On the last see (Ross 1977), and for philosophical applications of this to the case of virtue see Doris (1998, 2002) and Harman, (1998–99, 1999–2000). In the face of this kind of skepticism it is worth noting the enormous range of terms for character traits, and in particular for virtues. Talk of the four cardinal virtues may distract from the very large number identified, for example, in the Analects of Confucius—many more than are named in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Indeed Confucian moral direction would be impossible if these terms were removed.

  21. 21.

    Jubilee (2017, p. 3).

  22. 22.

    Frege (1892).

  23. 23.

    For discussion of these issues see Haldane (2000, 2011, 2013).

  24. 24.

    Mill (1859 Chaps. 2, 5).

  25. 25.

    For further discussion see Haldane (1996).

References

  • Anscombe, G.E.M. 1956. Mr Truman’s Degree. Oxford: Oxonian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G.E.M. 1957a. Intention. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G.E.M. 1957b. Intention. Oxford Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anscombe, G.E.M. 1958. Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy 33 (124): 1–19. Reprinted in Geach, Mary and Gormally, Luke (eds.) 2005. Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1224/1922. Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas, Second and Revised Edition, Literally translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, John. 1998. Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics. Nous 32 (4): 504–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doris, John. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Phillipa. 1965. Review of the Varieties of Goodness. Philosophical Review 74 (2): 240–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Phillipa. 1978. Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlieb. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892): 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, Mary, and Luke Gormally (eds.). 2005. Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, Mary, and Luke Gormally (eds.). 2008. Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, Peter. 1977. The Virtues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormally, Luke, David Albert Jones, and Roger Teichmann (eds.). 2016. The Moral Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 1989. Voluntarism and Realism in Medieval Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 15: 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 1991. Medieval and Renaissance Ethics. In A Companion to Ethics, ed. Peter Singer, 133–146. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 1996. Rational and Other Animals. In Verstehen and Humane Understanding, ed. Anthony O’Hear, 17–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 2000. Being Human: Science, Knowledge and Virtue. In Philosophy and Public Affairs, ed. John Haldane, 189–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 2004. (ed.) Modern Writings on Thomism. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 2011. Is Every Action Morally Significant? Philosophy 86 (3): 375–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 2013. Reasoning about the Human Good. In Reason, Morality and Law, ed. John Keown and Robert George, 37–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John. 2017. Virtue Ethics in the Medieval Period. In Varieties of Virtue Ethics, ed. David Carr, James Arthur, and Kristjan Kristjansson, 73–88. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert. 1998–9. Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99: 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Gilbert. 1999–2000. The Nonexistence of Character Traits. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100: 223–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jubilee. 2017. A Framework for Character Education in Schools. Birmingham: Jubilee Centre for Character and Values.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1966. A Short History of Ethics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1859. On Liberty. London: Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle, John A. 1957. Ethics: The Introduction to Moral Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Lee. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In Berkowitz, L (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10. New York: Academic Press, pp. 592-613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Nancy, Wright, Jennifer C. and Warren, M. (Forthcoming). Understanding virtue: Theory and Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, Georg. 1963. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Haldane .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haldane, J. (2019). Some Questions About Virtue. In: Grimi, E. (eds) Virtue Ethics: Retrospect and Prospect. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15860-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics