Analysis of Selected Factors’ Influence on the Specific Range of Modern Jet Transport Aircraft as a Complex Mechatronic System

  • Robert Sklorz
  • Adrian Zieliński
  • Jarosław BrodnyEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 934)


Modern jet transport aircraft shall be considered as complex mechatronic system. Looking at both mechanics and electronics it is a complicated technical device. In order to meet safety and efficiency goals jet transport aircraft are equipped with recording systems including flight data recorders such as FDR (Flight Data Recorder) and QAR/DAR (Quick/Data Access Recorder). DAR serves for purpose of operator’s customized data recording which allows detailed studies and analytics such as flight path optimization. This article describes method which utilizes DAR data to determine aircraft performance during cruise. Research was conducted based on real Airbus A320 DAR data. The main objective was to determine relations between recorded flight parameters and aircraft specific range, which is directly related to fuel consumption and key parameter for cruise efficiency. Analysis included assessment of data recording quality influence on the data source and obtained results. Method described allows also to verify manufacturer’s performance model, guarantees, monitor tail-specific aircraft cruise performance, as well as determine optimum altitudes, speeds and estimate relation of weight and aircraft fuel consumption. From mechatronics point of view it may be assumed that connection of mechanical and electronic elements together with flight path governing parameters allows control of key flight parameters, which in result allows their optimization and enhances efficiency.


Mechatronic system Aircraft Specific Range Recording system Flight data 


  1. 1.
    Obert, E.: Aerodynamic Design of Transport Aircraft, pp. 11–12. IOS Press BV, Amsterdam (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Senzig, D.A., Fleming, G.G., Iovinelli, R.J.: Modeling of terminal-area airplane fuel consumption. J. Aircraft 46(4), 1089–1093 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trani, A., Wing-Ho, F., Schilling, G., Baik, H., Seshadri, A.: A neural network model to estimate aircraft fuel consumption. In: 4th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Forum, pp. 2004–6401. AIAA, Chicago, 20–22 September 2004Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell, N.: The evolution of flight data analysis. In: ASASI Paper (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hull, G.: Fundamentals of Airplane Flight Mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Speyer, J.: Auditing aircraft cruise performance in airline revenue service. In: 7th Performance and Operations Conference, Cancun (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baklacioglu, T.: Modeling the fuel flow-rate of transport aircraft during flight phases using genetic algorithm-optimized neural networks. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 49(2016), 52–62 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wizz Air Hungary Ltd.BudapestHungary
  2. 2.StorkJet sp. z o. o.KatowicePoland
  3. 3.Faculty of Organization and ManagementSilesian University of TechnologyZabrzePoland

Personalised recommendations