Abstract
Starting from the mid-1970s and the mid-1990s, Richard Easterlin has provided three key contributions to the development of Happiness Economics. These regard: the existence of the paradox that takes his name, its explanation, and the use of psychological concepts in economics, like happiness and aspirations. Each of these issues is still unresolved. Tibor Scitovsky, working in the same years on the same issues, advanced an explanation of the paradox that endogenizes what are today the most widespread explanations, i.e. those based on adaptation and relative income. Confirmation of his hypothesis can be found in psychology and in economics that now use psychological concepts, like motivations and non-cognitive skills.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Easterlin (2001, p. 468) defends bivariate correlation in that it captures all the channels through which GDP can affect subjective well-being.
- 3.
More precisely, on using the same data as Stevenson and Wolfers (2008), Krueger (2008) shows that if the coefficient of (the logarithm of) GDP per capita on life satisfaction is not restricted to being the same across countries, but country-distinct coefficients are estimated, then the coefficient for the average country is negative and non-significant.
- 4.
The argument that people’s mass consumption moulds their preferences refers to the old American Institutionalists, like John K. Galbraith, but Scitovsky soon emphasised another argument: that people’s preferences may be moulded by market pressure if they have not sufficiently learned consumption skill (see the discussion in Pugno 2016).
- 5.
“[I]n man’s striving for his various goals in life, being on the way to those goals and struggling to achieve them are more satisfying than is the actual attainment of the goals” (Scitovsky 1976, p. 62).
- 6.
“It is also possible […] that […people] were gradually lured into a new way of life by their love of comfort, unaware at first of the costs involved and finding themselves fully accustomed to their new ways by time they realize the extent of the loss of pleasure suffered” (Scitovsky 1976, p. 73).
- 7.
See, for example, Rojas (2007).
- 8.
- 9.
It should be recalled that Scitovsky is also well-known for his seminal article on externalities (Scitovsky 1954).
- 10.
- 11.
In a survey, Huta (2015) observes that the links of life satisfaction with eudaimonia and with hedonism are rather sensitive to the measures used.
- 12.
Similar patterns have been identified by Nikolaev (2016). An even more surprising result is found by estimating the probability of enjoying both high eudemonia and low life satisfaction in a European sample. The age related pattern becomes inverted U-shaped, with the peak at 45 (Clark and Senik 2012, Tab. 6).
- 13.
The statement used in the survey to measure ‘attachment’ is as follows: “It is easy for me to become emotionally close to others. I am comfortable depending on others and having others depend on me. I don’t worry about being alone or having others not accept me.”
References
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of economics of education (pp. 1–181). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bachelet, M., Becchetti, L., & Pisani, F. (2016). Eudaimonic happiness as a leading health indicator (No. 150–2016). Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). Happy for how long? How social capital and economic growth relate to happiness over time. Ecological Economics, 108, 242–256.
Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth. World Development, 74, 333–351.
Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Pugno, M. (2013). Did the decline in social connections depress Americans’ happiness? Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1033–1059.
Beja, E. L. (2014). Income growth and happiness: Reassessment of the Easterlin Paradox. International Review of Economics, 61(4), 329–346.
Bianchi, M. (2012). A joyful economist. Scitovsky’s memoirs. History of Economic Thought and Policy, 2, 57–73.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.
Böckerman, P., Laamanen, J. P., & Palosaari, E. (2016). The role of social ties in explaining heterogeneity in the association between economic growth and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(6), 2457–2479.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books.
Boyce, C. J., Wood, A. M., & Powdthavee, N. (2013). Is personality fixed? Personality changes as much as “variable” economic factors and more strongly predicts changes to life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 287–305.
Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2005). Introduction. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2012). Is happiness di different from flourishing? Revue d’économie politique, 121, 17–34.
Clark, A. E., & Lee, T. (2017). Early-life correlates of later-life well-being: Evidence from the Wisconsin longitudinal study (PSE Working Papers No. 2017-32). London: Centre for Economic Performance.
Clark, A. E., & Senik, C. (2010). Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. The Economic Journal, 120(544), 573–594.
Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144.
Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Senik, C. (2014). The great happiness moderation. In A. E. Clark & C. Senik (Eds.), Happiness and economic growth (pp. 32–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. E., Flèche, S., & Lefkuangfu, W. N. (2017). The long-lasting effects of family and childhood on adult wellbeing: evidence from British cohort data (CEP Discussion Paper No 1493). London: Centre for Economic Performance.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow. London: Rider.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2010). Income, motivation, and satisfaction with life: An empirical analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 779–793.
Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 267–276.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honour of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.
Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47.
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness. Economic Journal, 111(473), 465–484.
Easterlin, R. A. (2005). Building a better theory of well-being. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 29–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Easterlin, R. A. (2015). Happiness and economic growth: The evidence. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life (pp. 283–299). Dordrecht: Springer.
Easterlin, R. A. (2016). Paradox lost? (IZA DP. No. 9676).
Easterlin, R. A., McVey, L. A., Switek, M., Sawangfa, O., & Zweig, J. S. (2010). The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22463–22468. 201015962.
Easterlin, R. A., Morgan, R., Switek, M., & Wang, F. (2012). China’s life satisfaction, 1990–2010. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(25), 9775–9780.
Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Algoe, S. B., Firestine, A. M., Arevalo, J. M., Ma, J., & Cole, S. W. (2015). Psychological well-being and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121839.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435.
Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Testing theories of happiness. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 116–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heckman, J. (2008). School, skills, and synapses. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 289–324.
Heckman, J. J., & Corbin, C. O. (2016). Capabilities and skills. Journal of human development and Capabilities, 17(3), 342–359.
Herbst, C. M. (2011). ‘Paradoxical’decline? Another look at the relative reduction in female happiness. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 773–788.
Huta, V. (2015). An overview of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being concepts. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Handbook of media use and well-being (pp. 14–33).. Chapter 2). New York: Routledge.
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762.
Krueger, A. B. (2008, May). Comment to B. Stevenson & J. Wolfers Economic growth and happiness (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp 95–100).
Layard, R. (1980). Human satisfactions and public policy. The Economic Journal, 90(360), 737–750.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood. New York: Guilford.
Nikolaev, B. (2016). Does higher education increase hedonic and eudaimonic happiness? (MPRA WP 78438).
Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831.
Paul, S., & Guilbert, D. (2013). Income–happiness paradox in Australia: Testing the theories of adaptation and social comparison. Economic Modelling, 30, 900–910.
Pfaff, T., & Hirata, J. (2013). Testing the Easterlin hypothesis with panel data (SOEP papers 554).
Powdthavee, N., & Stutzer, A. (2014). Economic approaches to understanding change in happiness. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness (pp. 219–244). New York: Academic.
Pugno, M. (2013). Scitovsky and the income-happiness paradox. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 43, 1–10.
Pugno, M. (2014a). Scitovsky’s ’The Joyless Economy’ and the economics of happiness. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 21(2), 278–303.
Pugno, M. (2014b). Scitovsky, behavioural economics, and beyond. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8(2014–24), 1–29.
Pugno, M. (2016). On the foundations of happiness in economics. London: Routledge.
Pugno, M. (2017). Scitovsky meets Sen: Endogenising the dynamics of capability. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1177–1196.
Rojas, M. (2007). Heterogeneity in the relationship between income and happiness: A conceptual-referent-theory explanation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(1), 1–14.
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83(1), 10–28.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.
Schwandt, H. (2014). Unmet aspirations as an explanation for the age U-shape in wellbeing (CEP dp 1229). Bonn: IZA.
Scitovsky, T. (1954). Two concepts of external economies. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 143–151.
Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy: The psychology of human satisfaction (Revised Edition 1992 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scitovsky, T. (1986). Human desires and economic satisfaction. New York: New York University Press.
Scitovsky, T. (1995). Economic theory and reality. Aldershot: Elgar.
Scitovsky, T. (1996). My own criticism of ‘The Joyless Economy’. Critical Review, 10(4), 595–606.
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008, May). Economic growth and happiness (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp 1–87).
Veenhoven, R., & Vergunst, F. (2014). The Easterlin illusion: Economic growth does go with greater happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(4), 311–343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pugno, M. (2019). Why the Easterlin Paradox? The Scitovsky Hypothesis. In: Rojas, M. (eds) The Economics of Happiness. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15835-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15834-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15835-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)