Skip to main content

Making the Diagnosis of Myositis: Skin Biopsy and Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Myositis
  • 914 Accesses

Abstract

Skin biopsy can be a valuable tool in the assessment of the cutaneous lesions of dermatomyositis (DM) and serves to distinguish it from other skin diseases that mimic dermatomyositis. The characteristic histologic findings include vacuolar dermatitis, a pattern seen across a spectrum of cutaneous disorders, including lupus erythematosus. Thus, a diagnosis of dermatomyositis is difficult to make on histopathology alone as the entire clinical picture must be carefully considered. Direct immunofluorescence can provide limited additional information, and additional special stains including immunostains are not necessary. Clinical-pathologic correlation remains the gold-standard criterion for diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Janis JF, Winkelmann RK. Histopathology of the skin. Arch Dermatol [Internet]. 1968;97(6):640–50. Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000372-198504000-00027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kasper CS, White CL, Freeman RG. Pathology and immunopathology of polymyositis/ dermatomyositis. Clin Dermatol [Internet]. 1988;6(2):64–75. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0738081X88900508

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hausmann G, Herrero C, Cid MC, Casademont J, Lecha M, Mascaró JM. Immunopathologic study of skin lesions in dermatomyositis. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 1991;25(2, Part 1):225–30. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0190962291701866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharon VR, Konia TH, Barr KL, Fung MA. Assessment of the ‘no eosinophils’ rule: are eosinophils truly absent in pityriasis lichenoides, connective tissue disease, and graft-vs.-host disease? J Cutan Pathol [Internet]. 2012;39(4):413–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2012.01891.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caproni M, Torchia D, Cardinali C, Volpi W, Del Bianco E, D’Agata A, Fabbri P, et al. Infiltrating cells, related cytokines and chemokine receptors in lesional skin of patients with dermatomyositis. Br J Dermatol [Internet]. 2004;151(4):784–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06144.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Akira ITO, Yoko F, Akari S, Tatsuya H, Masamitsu I. Dermatomyositis associated with diffuse dermal neutrophilia. Int J Dermatol [Internet]. 2018;34(11):797–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1995.tb04401.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McNiff JM, Kaplan DH . Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are present in cutaneous dermatomyositis lesions in a pattern distinct from lupus erythematosus. J Cutan Pathol [Internet]. 2008;35(5):452–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2007.00848.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang LM, Maheshwari P, Werth S, Schaffer L, Head SR, Kovarik C, et al. Identification and molecular analysis of glycosaminoglycans in cutaneous lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis. J Histochem Cytochem [Internet]. 2011;59(3):336–45. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3201158/

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendese G, Mahalingan M. Histopathology of Gottron’s papules – utility in diagnosing dermatomyositis. J Cutan Pathol [Internet]. 2007 Sep 18;34(10):793–796. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2006.00706.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Concha JSS, Merola JF, Fiorentino D, Werth VP. Re-examining mechanic’s hands as a characteristic skin finding in dermatomyositis. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 2018;78(4):769–775.e2. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962217325926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ayako I, Nanako Y, Yuichi Y, Osamu Y. Pseudocheckerboard pattern: an interesting histopathological finding in mechanic’s hands. J Cutan Pathol [Internet]. 2015;43(1):5–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.12583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernet LL, Lewis MA, Rieger KE, Casciola-Rosen L, Fiorentino DF. Ovoid palatal patch in dermatomyositis: a novel finding associated with anti-TIF1γ (p155) antibodies. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(9):1049–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McCollough M, Clay C. Vesiculo-bullous dermatomyositis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1998;20(2):170–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Glover M, Leigh I. Dermatomyositis pemphigoides: a case with coexistent dermatomyositis and bullous pemphigoid. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 1992;27(5, Part 2):849–52. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/019096229270264G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kubo M, Sato S, Kitahara H, Tsuchida T, Tamaki K. Vesicle formation in dermatomyositis associated with gynecologic malignancies. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 1996;34(2, Part 2):391–4. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962207800156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anthea A, Steve V, Surjit T, Roslyn V, Nicholas W, Sanjay S. Prominent subcutaneous oedema as a masquerading symptom of an underlying inflammatory myopathy. Intern Med J [Internet]. 2017;47(2):217–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fiorentino D, Chung L, Zwerner J, Rosen A, Casciola-Rosen L. The mucocutaneous and systemic phenotype of dermatomyositis patients with antibodies to MDA5 (CADM-140): a retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol .[Internet]. 2011;65(1):25–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2010.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Narang NS, Casciola-Rosen L, Li S, Chung L, Fiorentino DF. Cutaneous ulceration in dermatomyositis: association with anti–melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 antibodies and interstitial lung disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) [Internet]. 2015;67(5):667–72. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4404195/

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Santos Briz A, Calle A, Linos K, Semans B, Carlson A, Sangüeza OP, et al. Dermatomyositis panniculitis: a clinico-pathologic and immunohistochemical study of 18 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol [Internet]. 2018.; Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jdv.14932;32:1352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jasso-Olivares J, Diaz-Gonzalez JM, Miteva M. Horizontal and vertical sections of scalp biopsy specimens from dermatomyositis patients with scalp involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:1178–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magro CM, Segal JP, Crowson AN, Chadwick P. The phenotypic profile of dermatomyositis and lupus erythematosus: a comparative analysis. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37(6):659–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarin KY, Chung L, Kim J, Higgs BW, Jallal B, Yao Y, et al. Molecular profiling to diagnose a Case of atypical dermatomyositis. J Invest Dermatol [Internet]. 2013;133(12):2796–9. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022202X15360371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shima N, Murosaki T, Nagashima T, Iwamoto M, Amano Y, Nakano N, et al. Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with dermatomyositis-like eruptions. Intern Med [Internet]. 2017;56(15):2063–6. Available from: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/internalmedicine/56/15/56_56.8297/_article

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Valencia-Guerrero A, Deng A, Dresser K, Bouliane G, Cornejo KM. The value of direct immunofluorescence on proteinase-digested formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin biopsies. Am J Dermatopathol [Internet]. 2018;40(2):111–7. Available from: http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00000372-201802000-00002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roebker JJ, Case JD, Lear SC, Hodge SJ, Callen JP. Immunoperoxidase technique on paraffin sections fails to demonstrate immunoglobulin deposition in cutaneous lesions from patients with dermatomyositis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1988;10:297–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Magro CM, Crowson AN. The immunofluorescent profile of dermatomyositis: a comparative study with lupus erythematosus. J Cutan Pathol. 1997;24(9):543–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inbal Sander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sander, I. (2020). Making the Diagnosis of Myositis: Skin Biopsy and Interpretation . In: Aggarwal, R., Oddis, C. (eds) Managing Myositis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15820-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15820-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15819-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15820-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics