Advertisement

Managing Risk Through Cooperation: Need-Based Transfers and Risk Pooling Among the Societies of the Human Generosity Project

  • Lee CronkEmail author
  • Colette Berbesque
  • Thomas Conte
  • Matthew Gervais
  • Padmini Iyer
  • Brighid McCarthy
  • Dennis Sonkoi
  • Cathryn Townsend
  • Athena Aktipis
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation book series (STHE, volume 11)

Abstract

Risk is inevitable, and managing it is an important component of individual and community strategies to adapt to local conditions. In this chapter we provide an overview of the risk management frameworks in eight communities to show how each society manages risk socially. We focus especially on the use of need-based transfers to buffer the effects of disasters and ecological uncertainty and provide abundant evidence that need-based transfers are a common strategy for the social management of risk. We use the terms need-based transfers and debt-based transfers rather than other existing terms because no current terms used in the literature capture the underlying logic of need-based transfers. They do not describe the kinds of formal, contractual risk-pooling arrangements found at some of our field sites. The Human Generosity Project, a transdisciplinary effort to examine both biological and cultural influences on human cooperation, has documented and analyzed these and many other examples of social risk management.

Keywords

Risk management Cooperation Human Generosity Project 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Human Generosity Project is supported primarily by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation titled “Generous by nature: Need-based transfers and the origins of human cooperation.” Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. Work by Human Generosity Project team members has also been supported by the National Science Foundation, American Center for Mongolian Studies, Fulbright IIE, and Rutgers’ Center for Human Evolutionary Studies.

References

  1. Aktipis, C. A. (2004). Know when to walk away: Contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 231(2), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aktipis, C. A. (2006). Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adaptive Behavior, 14, 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aktipis, C. A. (2011). Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? Simple walk away strategy favors the evolution of cooperation in groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(4), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aktipis, C. A., Cronk, L., & de Aguiar, R. (2011). Risk-pooling and herd survival: An agent-based model of a Maasai gift-giving system. Human Ecology, 39(2), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aktipis, C. A., de Aguiar, R., Flaherty, A., Iyer, P., Sonkoi, D., & Cronk, L. (2016). Cooperation in an uncertain world: For the Maasai of East Africa, need-based transfers outperform account keeping in volatile environments. Human Ecology, 44(3), 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Barclay, P. (2013). Strategies for cooperation in biological markets, especially for humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(3), 164–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Evolhumbehav.2013.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 749–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnard, A. (1978). Universal systems of kin categorization. African Studies, 37(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barr, A., & Genicot, G. (2008). Risk sharing, commitment, and information: An experimental analysis. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6), 1151–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bartos, V. (2015). Seasonal scarcity and sharing norms. http://vojtechbartos.net/wp-content/uploads/Bartos-AFG-Seasonality.pdf
  12. Begzsuren, S., Ellis, J. E., Ojima, D. S., Coughenour, M. B., & Chuluun, T. (2004). Livestock responses to droughts and severe winter weather in the Gobi Three Beauty National Park, Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments, 59(4), 785–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berbesque, J. C., Marlowe, F. W., Shaw, P., & Thompson, P. (2014). Hunter–gatherers have less famine than agriculturalists. Biology Letters, 10(1), 20130853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berbesque, J. C., Wood, B. M., Crittenden, A. N., Mabulla, A., & Marlowe, F. W. (2016). Eat first, share later: Hadza Hunter–Gatherer men consume more while foraging than in central places. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(4), 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bird, R. L. B., & Bird, D. W. (1997). Delayed reciprocity and tolerated theft: The behavioral ecology of food-sharing strategies. Current Anthropology, 38(1), 49–78.  https://doi.org/10.1086/204581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bliege Bird, R., Bird, D. W., Smith, E. A., & Kushnick, G. C. (2002). Risk and reciprocity in Meriam food sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bold, B. (1996). Socio-economic segmentation – Khot-ail in nomadic livestock keeping of Mongolia. Nomadic Peoples, 33, 153–162.Google Scholar
  18. Bollig, M. (1998). Moral economy and self-interest: Kinship, friendship, and exchange among the Pokot (NW Kenya). In T. Schweizer & D. White (Eds.), Kinship, networks, and exchange (pp. 137–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bollig, M. (2006). Risk management in a hazardous environment: A comparative study of two pastoral societies (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burger, J. M., & Lynn, A. L. (2005). Superstitious behavior among American and Japanese professional baseball players. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cashdan, E. A. (1985). Coping with risk: Reciprocity among the Basarwa of Northern Botswana. Man, 20, 454–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cashdan, E. A. (Ed.). (1990). Risk and uncertainty in tribal and peasant economies. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  23. Chang, A., Cronk, L., & Aktipis, C. A. (2015). Cheater detection in need-based transfer systems. Columbia, CO: Human Behavior and Evolution Society.Google Scholar
  24. Conte, T. J. (2015). The effects of China’s Grassland contract policy on Mongolian Herders’ attitudes towards grassland management in Northeastern Inner Mongolia. Journal of Political Ecology, 22(1), 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Conte, T. J., & Tilt, B. (2014). The effects of China’s Grassland contract policy on pastoralist attitudes towards cooperation in an Inner Mongolian banner. Human Ecology, 42(6), 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cooper, L. (1993). Patterns of mutual assistance in the Mongolian pastoral economy. Nomadic Peoples, 33, 153–162.Google Scholar
  27. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31(3), 187–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cronk, L. (1989). The behavioral ecology of change among the Mukogodo of Kenya. Ph.D. dissertation, anthropology, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  29. Cronk, L. (2004). From Mukogodo to Maasai: Ethnicity and cultural change in Kenya. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Cronk, L. (2007). The influence of cultural framing on play in the trust game: A Maasai example. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cronk, L., & Aktipis, C. A. (2016a). What are “Need-Based Transfers”? Human generosity project blog post. http://humangenerosity.org
  32. Cronk, L., & Aktipis, C. A. (2016b). Sacredness as an implied threat of supernatural punishment: The case of need-based transfers. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 8, 282–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cronk, L., & Leech, B. L. (2013). Meeting at grand central: Understanding the social and evolutionary roots of cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Curtin, C., & Western, D. (2008). Grasslands, people, and conservation: Over-the-horizon learning exchanges between African and American Pastoralists. Conservation Biology, 22(4), 870–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dahl, G., & Hjort, A. (1976). Having herds: Pastoral herd growth and household economy. Stockholm: Dept. of Social Anthropology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  36. Dixit, A. K., Levin, S. A., & Rubenstein, D. I. (2013). Reciprocal insurance among Kenyan pastoralists. Theoretical Ecology, 6(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dorfman, M. S. (2007). Introduction to risk management and insurance. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Dyson-Hudson, N. (1966). Karimojong politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Endicott, E. (2012). A history of land use in Mongolia: The thirteenth century to the present. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fafchamps, M. (2011). Risk sharing between households. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, & M. O. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of social economics. San Diego/Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  41. Fafchamps, M., & Lund, S. (2003). Risk-sharing networks in rural Philippines. Journal of Development Economics, 71, 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E. (2000). The role of Mongolian nomadic pastoralists’ ecological knowledge in grassland management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1318–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Batkhishig, B., & Batbuyan, B. (2012). Cross-boundary and cross-level dynamics increase vulnerability to severe winter disasters (dzud) in Mongolia. Global Environmental Change, 22, 836–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Gardner, R., Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. M. (1990). The nature of common-pool resource problems. Rationality and Society, 2(3), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gelcich, S., Guzman, R., Rodriguez-Sickert, C., Castilla, J. C., & Cardenas, J. C. (2013). Exploring external validity of common pool resource experiments: Insights from artisanal benthic fisheries in Chile. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gervais, M. M. (2016). RICH economic games for networked relationships and communities: Development and preliminary validation in Yasawa, Fiji. Field Methods, 29, 113–129.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16643709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gmelch, G. (1971). Baseball magic. Society, 8(8), 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gmelch, G. (1992). Superstition and ritual in American baseball. Elysian Fields Quarterly, 11(3), 25–36.Google Scholar
  50. Gray, S., Sundal, M., Wiebusch, B., Little, M. A., Leslie, P. W., & Pike, I. L. (2003). Cattle raiding, cultural survival, and adaptability of East African pastoralists. Current Anthropology, 44(55), S3–S30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gulliver, P. H. (1955). The family herds: A study of two pastoral tribes in East Africa, the Jie and Turkana. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  52. Gurven, M., & Hill, K. (2009). Why do men hunt? Current Anthropology, 50(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gurven, M., & Hill, K. (2010). Moving beyond stereotypes of men’s foraging goals. Current Anthropology, 51(2), 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gurven, M., Allen-Arave, W., Hill, K., & Hurtado, M. (2000). “It’s a wonderful life”: Signaling generosity among the ache of Paraguay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(4), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hao, Y., Armbruster, D., & Hütt, M.-C. (2015a). Node survival in networks under correlated attacks. PLOS One., 10(5), e0125467.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hao, Y., Aktipis, C. A., Armbruster, D., & Cronk, L. (2015b). Need-based transfers on a network: A model of risk-pooling in ecologically volatile environments. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Humphrey, C., & Sneath, D. (1996). Culture and environment in inner Asia 1: The pastoral economy and the environment. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
  58. Humphrey, C., & Sneath, D. (1999). The end of nomadism? Society, state, and the environment in inner Asia. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
  59. Jones, B., Hawkes, K., & O’Connell, J. F. (2005). Older Hadza men and women as helpers: Residence data. In B. S. Hewlett & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Hunter-Gatherer childhoods: Evolutionary, developmental and cultural perspectives (pp. 214–236). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  60. Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., Tindale, R. S., & Smith, C. (2002). Social sharing and risk reduction: Exploring a computational algorithm for the psychology of windfall gains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2003). The logic of social sharing: An evolutionary game analysis of adaptive norm development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(1), 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. King, J. M., Sayers, A. R., Peacock, C. P., & Kontrohr, E. (1984). Maasai herd and flock structures in relation to livestock wealth, climate, and development. Agricultural Systems, 13, 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Levy, J. (2012). Freaks of fortune: The emerging world of capitalism and risk in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Little, P. D., Smith, K., Cellarius, B. A., Coppock, D. L., & Barrett, C. (2001). Avoiding disaster: Diversification and risk management among East African Herders. Development and Change, 32(3), 401–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mace, R. (1990). Pastoralist herd compositions in unpredictable environments: A comparison of model predictions and data from camel-keeping groups. Agricultural Systems, 33, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mace, R. (1993). Nomadic pastoralists adopt subsistence strategies that maximise long-term household survival. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 33(5), 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mace, R., & Houston, A. I. (1989). Pastoralist strategies for survival in unpredictable environments: A model of herd composition that maximises household viability. Agricultural Systems, 31(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  69. Mamdani, M., Kasoma, P. M. B., & Katende, A. B. (1992). Karamoja: Ecology and history. Kampala: Centre for Basic Research.Google Scholar
  70. Marlowe, F. (2010). The Hadza: Hunter–gatherers of Tanzania. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  71. Messick, M., Allison, S. T., & Samuelson, C. D. (1988). Framing and communication effects on group members’ responses to environmental and social uncertainty. In S. Maital (Ed.), Applied behavioral economics (Vol. II). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Muñoz, A. E., Sznycer, D., Chang, A., Cronk, L., & Aktipis, C. A. (2016). Cheater detection for need-based transfers: Beyond account-keeping. Chicago: Association for Psychological Science.Google Scholar
  73. Nesse, R. M. (2009). Runaway social selection for displays of partner value and altruism. In The moral brain (pp. 211–231). Amsterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nolet, E. (2012). Are you prepared? Representations and management of floods in Lomanikoro, Rewa (Fiji). Disasters. In Uncertainty and Disquiet, 12ème Biennale de l’European Association of Social Anthropologists, Université de Nanterre, 10–13 July 2012.Google Scholar
  76. Pederson, N., Hessl, A. E., Baatarbileg, N., Anchukaitis, K. J., & Di Cosmo, N. (2014). Pluvials, droughts, the Mongol empire, and modern Mongolia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4375–4379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Perlov, D. C. (1987). Trading for influence: The social and cultural economics of livestock marketing among the Highland Samburu of Northern Kenya. Ph.D. dissertation, anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  78. Petersen, M. B. (2012). Social welfare as small-scale help: Evolutionary psychology and the deservingness heuristic. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pollard, G., Davies, M. I. J., & Moore, H. L. (2015). Women, marketplaces and exchange partners amongst the Marakwet of Northwest Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies, 9(3), 412–439.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17531055.2015.1089699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Quam, M. D. (1976). Pastoral economy and cattle marketing in Karamoja, Uganda. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  81. Ravuvu, A. D. (1987). The Fijian ethos. Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
  82. Rejda, G. E. (2011). Principles of risk management and insurance. Bengaluru: Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
  83. Sahlins, M. D. (1962). Moala: Culture and nature on a Fijian island. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sahlins, M. D. (1965). On the sociology of primitive exchange. In Banton, M. (ed.), The relevance of models for social anthropology. Tavistock. Reprinted in Stone Age Economics, London (1972, Transaction).Google Scholar
  85. Sayre, N. F. (2005). Working wilderness: The Malpai Borderlands group and the future of the American range. Tucson, AZ: Rio Nuevo.Google Scholar
  86. Sosis, R. (2007). Psalms for safety. Current Anthropology, 48(6), 903–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sosis, R., & Ruffle, B. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular kibbutzim. Current Anthropology, 44(5), 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Spencer, P. (1965). The Samburu: A study of gerontocracy in a nomadic tribe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  89. Stites, E., Akabwai, D., Mazurana, D., & Ateyo, P. (2007). Angering Akujů: Survival and suffering in Karamoja -a report on livelihoods and human security in the Karamoja Region of Uganda (p. 33). Boston: Feinstein International Center.Google Scholar
  90. Swift, J., & Siurua, H. (2002). Drought and Zud but no famine (yet) in the Mongolian herding economy. IDS Bulletin, 33(4), 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Takasaki, Y. (2011). Do the commons help augment mutual insurance among the poor? World Development, 39, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Templer, G., Swift, J., & Payne, P. (1993). The changing significance of risk in the Mongolian pastoral economy. Nomadic Peoples, 33, 105–122.Google Scholar
  93. Thrift, E. D., & Byambabaatar, I. (2015). Management of Dzud risk in Mongolia: Mutual aid and institutional interventions. In Proceedings of the Trans-disciplinary Research Conference: Building Resilience of Mongolian Rangelands, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, June 9–10, 2015.Google Scholar
  94. Turnbull, C. M. (1972). The mountain people. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  95. UNDP. (2010). UNDP on early recovery: 2009–2010 Mongolian Dzud. http://www.undp.mn/publications/Early_recovery.pdf
  96. Vernooy, R. (2011). How Mongolian herders are transforming nomadic pastoralism. Solutions. http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com
  97. Wiessner, P. (1977) Hxaro: A regional system of reciprocity for reducing risk among the! Kung San. Ph.D. dissertation, anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  98. Wiessner, P. (1982). Risk, reciprocity and social influences on! Kung San economics. In E. Leacock & R. Lee (Eds.), Politics and history in band societies (Vol. 61, pp. 61–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Winterhalder, B. (1986). Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5(4), 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lee Cronk
    • 1
    Email author
  • Colette Berbesque
    • 2
  • Thomas Conte
    • 1
  • Matthew Gervais
    • 3
  • Padmini Iyer
    • 1
  • Brighid McCarthy
    • 1
  • Dennis Sonkoi
    • 1
  • Cathryn Townsend
    • 1
  • Athena Aktipis
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of Life SciencesUniversity of RoehamptonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations