Advertisement

Active Suspensions Control with Actuator Dynamics

  • Weichao SunEmail author
  • Huijun Gao
  • Peng Shi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 204)

Abstract

In the previous chapters, the dynamic process of the actuator is neglected by us. In this chapter, we mainly look at actuator dynamics when designing control scheme, and electro-hydraulic systems are typically chosen as the actuators. However, the main drawback of electro-hydraulic systems is their highly non-linear behavior. In addition, there exists model uncertainties when establishing the mathematical model. All these factors make it difficult to design the controller and influence the effectiveness of active force tracking.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Merritt, Hydraul. Control Syst. (John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, USA, 1967)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Matthijs, C. MarcvandeWal, B. Okko, LPV control for a wafer stage: beyond the theoretical solution. Control Eng. Pract. 13(2), 231–245 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Alleyne, R. Liu, On the limitations of force tracking control for hydraulic servosystems. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 121(2), 184–190 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Huang, W. Lin, Adaptive fuzzy controller with sliding surface for vehicle suspension control. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 11(4), 550–559 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Yao, M. Tomizuka, Adaptive robust control of MIMO nonlinear systems in semi-strict feedback forms. Automatica 37, 1305–1321 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Lu, B. Yao, W. Lin, A Two-loop contour tracking control for biaxial servo systems with constraints and uncertainties (Proc. Amer. Control Conf, Washington, DC, 2013), pp. 6468–6473Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Zhang, J. Chen, Z. Lee, Adaptive robust control for servo mechanisms with partially unknown states via dynamic surface control approach. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18(3), 723–731 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Zhang, G. Duan, Robust adaptive integrated translation and rotation control of a rigid spacecraft with control saturation and actuator misalignment. ACTA Astronaut. 86, 167–187 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Alleyne, J. Hedrick, Nonlinear adaptive control of active suspensions. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 3(1), 94–101 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Yagiz, Y. Hacioglu. Backstepping control of a vehicle with active suspensions. Control Eng. PractGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Liu, \({H}_{\infty }\) filtering for uncertain stochastic time-delay systems with sector-bounded nonlinearities. Automatica 44(5), 1268–1277 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Chantranuwathana, H. Peng, Adaptive robust force control for vehicle active suspensions. Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 18(2), 83–102 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Sun, H. Gao, O. Kaynak, Finite frequency \({H}_{\infty }\) control for vehicle active suspension systems. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 19(2), 416–422 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Yao, G. Chiu, J. Reedy. Nonlear adaptive robust control of one-dof electro-hydrulic servo systems. in ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE’SY)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Ma, H. Chen, Disturbance attenuation control of active suspension with non-linear actuator dynamics. IET Control Theor. Appl. 5(1), 112–122 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Yagiz, Y. Hacioglu, Backstepping control of a vehicle with active suspensions. Control Eng. Pract. 16, 1457–1467 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AstronauticsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations