Advertisement

Finite Frequency \(H_{\infty }\) Control for Active Suspensions

  • Weichao SunEmail author
  • Huijun Gao
  • Peng Shi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 204)

Abstract

Compared with the \(H_{\infty }\) control method in the entire frequency domain in Sect.  2.1, a \(H_{\infty }\) control scheme in the finite frequency domain is proposed in this chapter. In Sect. 3.1, the finite frequency \(H_{\infty }\) control is more effective because the human body is much sensitive to vibrations of a certain frequency band. The \(H_{\infty }\) control scheme in finite frequency domain is based on that all the state variables are observable in Sect. 3.1. However, in practice, it is difficult to realize all the state variables measurable. And obtaining all the state variables resulted in more sensors, higher cost, and additional complexity.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Yamashita, K. Fujimori, K. Hayakawa, H. Kimura, Application of \(H_{\infty }\) control to active suspension systems. Automatica 30(11), 1717–1729 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. Hencey, A.G. Alleyne, A KYP lemma for LMI regions. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 52(10), 1926–1930 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Khatibi, A. Karimi, R. Longchamp, Fixed-order controller design for polytopic systems using LMIs. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 53(1), 428–434 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Collado, R. Lozano, R. Johansson, On Kalman–Yakubovich–Popov lemma for stabilizable systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 46(7), 1089–1093 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Iwasaki, S. Hara, Generalized KYP lemma: unified frequency domain inequalities with design applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 50(1), 41–59 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Apkarian, H.D. Tuan, J. Bernussou, Continuous-time analysis, eigenstructure assignment, and \({H}_{2}\) synthesis with enhanced Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI) characterizations. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 42(12), 1941–1946 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Gahinet, A. Nemirovskii, A.J. Laub, M. Chilali, LMI Control Toolbox User’s Guide (The Math Works Inc., Natick, MA, 1995)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Yamashita, K. Fujimori, K. Hayakawa, H. Kimura, Application of \({H}_{\infty }\) control to active suspension systems. Automatica 30(11), 1717–1729 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Karimi, H. Gao, Mixed \({H}_{2}\)/\({H}_{\infty }\) output-feedback control of second-order neutral systems with time-varying state and input delays. ISA Trans. 47(3), 311–324 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    C. Scherer, P. Gahinet, M. Chilali, Multi-objective output-feedback control via LMI optimization. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 42(7), 896–911 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AstronauticsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations