Advertisement

Background, Modelling and Problem Statements of Active Suspensions

  • Weichao SunEmail author
  • Huijun Gao
  • Peng Shi
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 204)

Abstract

In this chapter, the background knowledge of the suspension systems is demonstrated. We mainly introduce three categories of suspension systems: two degree-of-freedom (DOF) quarter-car model, four DOF half-car model, and seven DOF full-vehicle model, whose mathematical models are established. The road excitement model is given in time domain and in the form of spectrum as well. In addition, control objectives of active suspension systems are illustrated.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Hrovat, Survey of advanced suspension developments and related optimal control applications. Automatica 33(10), 1781–1817 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Cao, X. Song, M. Ahmadian, Editors perspectives: road vehicle suspension design, dynamics, and control. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 49(1–2), 3–28 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.S. Sharp, S.A. Hassan, The relative performance capabilities of passive, active and semi-active car suspension systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 200(3), 219–228 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.F. Naude, J.A. Snyman, Optimisation of road vehicle passive suspension systems. Part 2. Qualification and case study. Appl. Math. Model. 27(4), 263–274 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Du, K.Y. Sze, J. Lam, Semi-active H control of vehicle suspension with magneto-rheological dampers. J. Sound Vib. 283(283), 981–996 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.J.H. Paulides, L. Encica, E. Lomonova et al., Design considerations for a semi-active electromagnetic suspension system. IEEE Trans. Magn. 42(10), 3446–3448 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Li, H. Liu, H. Gao et al., Reliable fuzzy control for active suspension systems with actuator delay and fault. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(2), 342–357 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Priyandoko, M. Mailah, H. Jamaluddin, Vehicle active suspension system using skyhook adaptive neuro active force control. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 23(3), 855–868 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Poussot-Vassal, C. Spelta, O. Sename et al., Survey and performance evaluation on some automotive semi-active suspension control methods: a comparative study on a single-corner model. Annu. Rev. Control. 36(1), 148–160 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.J. Gordon, C. Marsh, M.G. Milsted, A comparison of adaptive LQG and nonlinear controllers for vehicle suspension systems. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 20(6), 321–340 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Changcheng Zhou, Vehicle Ride Comfort and Suspension System Design (China Machine Press, Beijing, 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Du, N. Zhang, L. Wang, Switched control of vehicle suspension based on motion-mode detection. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 52(1), 142–165 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu Guiqing, Research status and development trend of vehicle suspension. China High-Tech Enterp. 22, 36 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Chen, K.H. Guo, Constrained \(H_{\infty }\) control of active suspensions: an LMI approach. IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol. 13(3), 412–421 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AstronauticsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations