Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Information Bridges: Understanding the Informational Role of Network Brokerages in Polarised Online Discourses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information in Contemporary Society (iConference 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11420))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social networking and micro-blogging sites such as Twitter and Weibo have provided new platforms of public discussions for Internet users. As the number of online social movements has increased in recent years, the Chinese government has adopted new media and has strategically confronted online social movements with orchestrated campaigns, which lead to a dichotomy between the Chinese government and civil society. Using a network analysis perspective, this research aims at studying the polarization of Chinese online political discourse, by examining who are playing the key roles in bridging different voices and exchanging various viewpoints in an online debate. I collected data from a conversation network in a massive online protest on Weibo, visualised the polarization between the Chinese government and civil society, and analysed the typological differences between the two groups. This research demonstrated the structural role of brokers in information diffusion within conversation network by using Susceptible-Infected (SI) simulation, showing that brokerage plays a key role in bridging the polarized online opinions and facilitating information diffusion. Taking a social network analysis perspective, this research re-examined Chinese contentious social movement under its political regime and can shed lights onto the understanding of the structural and informational roles of network brokerages for the deliberative democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With RANDBETWEEN function in Excel.

References

  • Ackland, R.: Mapping the US political blogosphere: are conservative bloggers more prominent? In: BlogTalk Downunder 2005 Conference, Sydney (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, pp. 36–43. ACM, New York, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, R.M., et al.: A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415), 295–298 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Ellison, N.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. 3(38), 16–31 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundidge, J.: Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: the contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. J. Commun. 60(4), 680–700 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A., Liang, Y.: Tools and methods for capturing Twitter data during natural disasters. First Monday 17(4) (2012). https://firstmonday.org/article/view/3937/3193

  • Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.: Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In: Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R. (eds.) Social Capital : Theory and Research (Sociology and Economics), pp. 31–56. Aldine de Gruyter, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S.: Brokerage and Closure. An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M.: Communication Power. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, 95–120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Political polarization on twitter. In ICWSM, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1), 35–41 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R.K.: Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 14(2), 265–285 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1, 201–233 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadgu, A.T., Kiran, G., Ingmar, W.: Political hashtag hijacking in the US. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 55–56 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z.: Political communication in dual discourse universes. In: Willnat, L., Aw, A. (eds.) Political Communication in Asia, pp. 43–71. Routledge, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Sun, X.: Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Inf. Commun. Soc. 17(1), 86–104 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsai, M., et al.: Small but slow world: How network topology and burstiness slow down spreading. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 83, 025102 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, G., Pan, J., Roberts, M.E.: How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 107(2), 326–343 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 591–600. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, Y., Yang, B.: Exploring online polarization phenomenon: content analysis of four major Chinese BBS forums. Youth Stud. 2010(2), 1–12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C.: Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Soc. Res. 66(3), 745–758 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Munson, S.A., Resnick, P.: The prevalence of political discourse in non-political blogs. In: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, July 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M.E., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 69, 026113 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nip, J.Y., Fu, K.W.: Challenging official propaganda? Public opinion leaders on sina weibo. China Q. 225, 122–144 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onnela, J.P., et al.: Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(18), 7332–7336 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K.L., Brady, H., Verba, S.: Social media and political engagement. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2012). http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/

  • Stewart, L.G., Arif, A., Starbird, K.: Examining trolls and polarization with a retweet network. In: MIS2: Misinformation and Misbehavior Mining on the Web, WSDM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L.: Gaming: Conflict and Harmony of Interest in the Fractured Society. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R.: Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua News Agency: Integrating traditional mainstream media with new media technology, August 2014. http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2014-08/20/c_1112160707.htm

  • Yang, G.: Internet activism & the party-state in China. Daedalus 143(2), 110–123 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK

    Pu Yan

Authors
  1. Pu Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pu Yan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

    Natalie Greene Taylor

  2. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

    Caitlin Christian-Lamb

  3. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Michelle H. Martin

  4. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Bonnie Nardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yan, P. (2019). Information Bridges: Understanding the Informational Role of Network Brokerages in Polarised Online Discourses. In: Taylor, N., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M., Nardi, B. (eds) Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11420. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15741-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15742-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation