Skip to main content

Curiosities: Sudakov Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Looking Inside Jets

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 958))

  • 780 Accesses

Abstract

In this Chapter we go back to the SoftDrop algorithm and we study two variables deeply connected to it: the angular separation of the two subjets that pass SoftDrop and their momentum sharing. We find that while the former can be described using the all-order techniques described so far, the latter one cannot be. It instead exhibits peculiar features. This observable is not collinear safe for all values of the angular exponent β but it belongs to the wider class of Sudakov-safe observables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that we have used the same approach as for the rest of this book and included it in the double-logarithmic terms. In this specific case, this is less relevant as the endpoint of the distribution does not depend on it, so we could have left it explicitly as a separate correction.

  2. 2.

    Here, the case of negative β can be seen as shifting a whole part of the distribution to θ g = 0.

  3. 3.

    In practice, we have frozen the coupling at a scale μ NP = 1 GeV, cf. Appendix A.

  4. 4.

    This is easy to understand from a physical viewpoint: both R′(θ g) and the denominator of Eq. (9.10) correspond to the probability for having a real emission passing the SoftDrop condition at a given θ g.

  5. 5.

    Note that the assumptions used in this book slightly differ from the ones originally used in [51].

References

  1. STAR collaboration, K. Kauder, Measurement of the shared momentum fraction z g using jet reconstruction in p+p and Au+Au collisions with STAR. Nucl. Phys. A967, 516–519 (2017). [1704.03046]

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.J. Larkoski, J. Thaler, Unsafe but calculable: ratios of angularities in perturbative QCD. J. High Energy Phys. 1309, 137 (2013) . [1307.1699]

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez, J. Thaler, Soft drop. J. High Energy Phys. 1405, 146 (2014). [1402.2657]

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, J. Thaler, Sudakov safety in perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. D91, 111501 (2015) . [1502.01719]

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, The catchment area of jets. J. High Energy Phys. 04, 005 (2008) . [0802.1188]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. F.A. Dreyer, G.P. Salam, G. Soyez, The Lund jet plane. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 064 (2018). [1807.04758]

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Marzani, L. Schunk, G. Soyez, A study of jet mass distributions with grooming. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 132 (2017). [1704.02210]

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Sapeta, Q.C. Zhang, The mass area of jets. J. High Energy Phys. 06, 038 (2011). [1009.1143]

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Larkoski, S. Marzani, J. Thaler, A. Tripathee, W. Xue, Exposing the QCD splitting function with CMS open data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 132003 (2017). [1704.05066]

    Google Scholar 

  10. CMS collaboration, Y. Chen, Jet substructure through splitting functions and mass in pp and PbPb collisions at 5.02 TeV with CMS. Nucl. Phys. A967, 512–515 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ALICE collaboration, D. Caffarri, Exploring jet substructure with jet shapes in ALICE. Nucl. Phys. A967, 528–531 (2017). [1704.05230]

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Lapidus, M.H. Oliver, Hard substructure of quenched jets: a Monte Carlo study. 1711.00897

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, K.C. Zapp, Medium response in JEWEL and its impact on jet shape observables in heavy ion collisions. J. High Energy Phys. 07, 141 (2017). [1707.01539]

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Neill, Non-global and clustering effects for groomed multi-prong jet shapes. 1808.04897

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Tripathee, W. Xue, A. Larkoski, S. Marzani, J. Thaler, Jet substructure studies with CMS open data. Phys. Rev. D96, 074003 (2017). [1704.05842]

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Gallicchio, M.D. Schwartz, Seeing in color: jet superstructure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022001 (2010). [1001.5027]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marzani, S., Soyez, G., Spannowsky, M. (2019). Curiosities: Sudakov Safety. In: Looking Inside Jets. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15709-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics