Towards Decolonisation Within University Education: On the Innovative Application of Educational Technology

  • Faiq WaghidEmail author


In this chapter, Faiq Waghid argues in defence of a Rancièrian notion of democratic education, which he equates with a practice of decolonisation of education. The latter idea is innovative in itself considering that decolonising education is being considered tantamount to democratising education. The idea of democratic education he proposes is couched within a Rancièrian framework of pedagogical action whereby students in relation to teachers in university classrooms can articulate their intellectual equality. That is, they can come to speech by articulating their claims in inclusive pedagogical encounters. By drawing on examples in educational technology, Faiq Waghid shows how podcasts, clickers and social networking sites potentially enhance democratised pedagogical spaces through which teaching and learning can hopefully be decolonised. Although it seems Faiq Waghid is arguing for a position of changing the pedagogical institutional structures—a matter of making a case for decoloniality—his argument that equates what we would assert as decolonial pedagogical engagement accentuates the importance of addressing undemocratic concerns vis-à-vis the cultivation of an equal community of inquiry among teachers and students in a university setting.


  1. Beaudoin, M. (2002). Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(2), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biesta, G. (2009). Sporadic democracy: Education, democracy, and the question of inclusion. In M. Katz, S. Verducci, & S. Biesta (Eds.), Education, democracy, and the moral life (pp. 101–112). Washington, DC: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Li, L., & Pitts, J. P. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 12(1), 175–185.Google Scholar
  4. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2011). The hatred of public schooling. In J. Masschelein & M. Simons (Eds.), Rancière, public schooling and the taming of democracy (pp. 150–165). London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mazer, J. P., Murphey, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on credibility. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McHaney, R. (2011). The new digital shoreline: How Web 2.0 and millennials are revolutionizing higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  7. Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Rancière, J. (1992). Politics, identification and subjectivization. October, 61(1), 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rancière, J. (2006). Hatred of democracy (S. Corcoran, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Ringrose, J. (2011). Beyond discourse? Using Deleuze and Guattari’s schizoanalysis to explore affective assemblages, heterosexually striated space, and lines of flight online and at school. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(6), 598–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Towner, T. L., & Munoz, C. L. (2011). Facebook and education: A classroom connection. Educating Educators with Social Media, 12, 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations