Skip to main content

Working with Bibliographic Information and Creating Literature Reviews

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA

Abstract

Working with specialized literature is a core element of many scientific disciplines. It is difficult to imagine a report for a project, master’s thesis, or dissertation in which previous research has not been systematically analyzed and presented (Creswell, 2016, pp. 58–66). As more and more publishers make their journals and publications accessible online, the creation of literature reviews has become easier and more efficient. MAXQDA is suitable for day-to-day work with literature as well as the creation of literature reviews (e.g., the preparation of theory chapters and research reports) as well as for systematic reviews for the preparation of research results for meta-analysis. In particular, MAXQDA can be used to manage notes and create summaries to support the writing process. When working with literature, bibliographic information (author, year of publication, etc.) must be distinguished from the content of the literature. MAXQDA focuses primarily on the content and is not a specialized reference management software; however, data from such programs can be imported into MAXQDA for further processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A. (2010). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C. (2017). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyvaert, M., Hannes, K., & Onghena, P. (2016). Using mixed methods research synthesis for literature reviews. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, U.-K. (2014, May 28). MAXQDA11 Tip of the month: How I manage my excerpts with MAXQDA [blog post]. Retrieved November 5, 2018, from https://www.maxqda.com/tip-month-manage-excerpts-with-maxqda

  • Sauerborn, E. (2014, August 18). MAXQDA11 Tip of the month: How I manage my literature with MAXQDA [blog post]. Retrieved November 5, 2018, from https://www.maxqda.com/managing-literature-maxqda

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S. (2019). Working with Bibliographic Information and Creating Literature Reviews. In: Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15670-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15671-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics