Skip to main content

Mediation Theory Between Pokémon GO and the Everyday World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Augmented Reality Games I

Abstract

This work aims to study the effects of augmented reality (AR) on the everyday world. Many studies already highlight the relations between digital and real by showing how digital objects affect our perception of the everyday world. However, they focus on these effects as if there was an everyday world from which to start and to which add these digital objects. This work focuses on a different perspective by showing how the meaning given to the everyday world is already founded on the use of these technologies. The values we find in our everyday experience emerge from the possible interactions with new technologies. The use of Pokémon GO then do not merely shape our everyday world by providing new digital elements in it, but it also reshapes the way we live and the way we think of our lives in the everyday world even when we do not use that technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Through the time, the application developed novel features enabling people to better interact with each other for example by joining their “forces” against powerful Pokémon.

  2. 2.

    We will use the distinction between “real” and “virtual” according to the famous distinction proposed by Milgram (1994). Even if there are other ways for classifying augmented realities (Hugues et al. 2011), this “classic” distinction provides us with a background to analyse the relation between what is the “real” world before the augmentations and the “augmented and virtual one.”

  3. 3.

    A preliminary analysis of Pokémon Go and phenomenology can be seen in Liberati (2018a).

  4. 4.

    By entering, the subjects do not merely “accept” the objects and the reality where they are, but they live in the different world “as if” it were real.

  5. 5.

    For some application of it see also Liberati (2018b), Liberati and Nagataki (2018), Kudina and Verbeek (2018).

References

  • Adams T (2015) Sherry Turkle: ‘I am not anti-technology, I am pro-conversation’. Guard

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida T (2015) Designing intimate wearables to promote preventative health care practices. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing and proceedings of the 2015 ACM international symposium on wearable computers—UbiComp ’15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, pp 659–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayaß R (2016) Life-world, sub-worlds, after-worlds: the various ‘realnesses’ of multiple realities. Hum Stud 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9380-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri S, Vettore G, Pietrantonio V et al (2017) Pedestrian inattention blindness while playing Pokémon Go as an emerging health-risk behavior: a case report. J Med Internet Res 19:e86. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G, Brooke T, Churchill E, Paulos E (2003) Intimate ubiquitous computing. In: Proceedings of UBICOMP 2003. ACM, pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1991) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Books Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Casebier A (1991) Film and phenomenology: toward a realist theory of cinematic representation. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • de Warren N (2010) Tamino’s eyes, Pamina’s gaze: Husserl’s phenomenology of image-consciousness refashioned. In: Ierna C, Jacobs H, Mattens F (eds) Philosophy, phenomenology, sciences: essays in commemoration of Edmund Husserl. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–332

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • de Warren N (2014) Towards a phenomenological analysis of virtual fictions. Metod Int Stud Phenomenol Philos 2:91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredette J, Marom R, Steiner K, Witters L (2012) The promise and peril of hyperconnectivity for organizations and societies. In: The global information technology report 2012, pp 113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugues O, Fuchs P, Nannipieri O (2011) New augmented reality taxonomy: technologies and features of augmented environment. In: Furht B (ed) Handbook of augmented reality. Springer, New York, pp 47–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Husserl E (1980) Phantasie, Bildbewußtsein, Erinnerung. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph B, Armstrong DG (2016) Potential perils of peri-Pokémon perambulation: the dark reality of augmented reality? Oxford Med Case Rep 2016:omw080. https://doi.org/10.1093/omcr/omw080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudina O, Verbeek P-P (2018) Ethics from Within. Sci Technol Hum Values 016224391879371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918793711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N (2013) Improving the embodiment relations by means of phenomenological analysis on the “reality” of ARs. In: 2013 IEEE international symposium on mix augment reality—arts, media, humanities, pp 13–17. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISMAR-AMH.2012.6483983

  • Liberati N (2014) [Poster] A single co-lived augmented world or many solipsistic fantasies? In: 2014 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality—media, art, social science, humanities and design (ISMAR-MASH’D), pp 71–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N (2015a) “Digital Materiality” and Augmented Reality. In: Cheok AD (ed) Hyperconnectivity and the future of internet communication. Lambert Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N (2015b) Augmented “Ouch”. How to create intersubjective augmented objects into which we can bump. In: 2015 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality—media, art, social science, humanities and design. IEEE, pp 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N (2016) Augmented reality and ubiquitous computing: the hidden potentialities of augmented reality. AI Soc 31:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0543-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N (2018a) Phenomenology, Pokémon Go, and other augmented reality games. Hum Stud 41:211–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-017-9450-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N (2018b) Achieving a self-satisfied intimate life through computer technologies? The realizations of the self. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 233–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liberati N, Nagataki S (2018) Vulnerability under the gaze of robots: relations among humans and robots. AI Soc 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0849-1

  • Lotz C (2007) Depiction and plastic perception. A critique of Husserl’s theory of picture consciousness. Cont Philos Rev 40:171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDuffie MF (1995) Art as an enclave of meaning. Springer, Netherlands, pp 205–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram P (1994) Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. SPIE Telemanipulator Telepresence Technol 2351:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneegass S, Amft O (eds) (2017) Smart textiles. Fundamentals, design, and interaction. Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz A (1962) Collected papers: The problem of social reality. Martinus Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack VC (1992) The address of the eye: a phenomenology of film experience. Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (2011) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle S (2015) Reclaiming conversation: the power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek P-P (2008) Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: a postphenomenological analysis. Hum Stud 31:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek P-P (2015) Beyond interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions XXII:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltemathe M (2014) Bridging multiple realities: religion, play and Alfred Schutz’s theory of the life-world. In: Heidi AC, Grieve GP (eds) Playing with religion in digital games. Indiana University Press, pp 238–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser M (1993) Hot topics—ubiquitous computing. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 26:71–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.237456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiser M (1996) Open house. In: ITP review, the web magazine of the interactive telecommunications program of New York University, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Liberati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liberati, N. (2019). Mediation Theory Between Pokémon GO and the Everyday World. In: Geroimenko, V. (eds) Augmented Reality Games I. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15615-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15616-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics